Publication Cover
Transportation Letters
The International Journal of Transportation Research
Volume 5, 2013 - Issue 4
90
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Modeling individuals’ attitudes toward joint out-of-home activity participation with household members

&
Pages 213-228 | Received 17 Jul 2013, Accepted 09 Aug 2013, Published online: 03 Dec 2013

References

  • Ajzen I. 1987. Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In , Berkowitz L (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 20, 1–63. New York: Academic Press.
  • Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior, in Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol. 50, 179–211.
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. 2008. Social networks, social interactions, and activity–travel behavior: a framework for microsimulation, Environ. Plan. B, 35, (6), 1012–1027.
  • Axhausen KW. 2005. Social networks and travel: some hypotheses, (eds , Donaghy K, Poppelreuter S, Rudinger G), in Social aspects of sustainable transport: transatlantic perspectives, Aldershot, Ashgate.
  • Bandura A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, Am. Psychol., 37, (2), 122–147.
  • Baron RA. 2008. The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process, Acad. Manage. Rev., 33, (2), 328–340.
  • Carrasco JA, Miller EJ. 2009. The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks of social activity frequency between individuals, Transp. Res. A, 43, (1), 90–104.
  • Daly AJ, Hess S, Patruni B, Potoglou D, Rohr C. 2012. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour, Transportation, 39, (2), 267–297.
  • Day GS. 1973. Theories of structure and change, in Consumer behavior: theoretical sources, (eds. , Ward S, Robertson T S), Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 303–353.
  • Dobson R, Tischer ML. 1976. Beliefs about buses, carpools, and single occupant autos: a market segmentation approach, Transp. Res. Forum Proc., 17, 200–209.
  • Ferdous N, Eluru N, Bhat CR, Meloni I. 2010. A multivariate ordered response model system for adults weekday activity episode generation by activity purpose and social context, Transp. Res. B, 44, (8–9), 922–994.
  • Gärling T, Gillholm R, Gärling A. 1998. Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: the validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use, Transportation, 25, 147–167.
  • Gliebe JP, Koppelman FS. 2002. A model of joint activity participation between HH members, Transportation, 29, (1), 49–72.
  • Gliebe JP, Koppelman FS. 2005. Modeling household activity–travel interactions as parallel constrained choices, Transportation, 32, (5), 449–471.
  • Golob TF, Hensher DA. 1998. Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters attitudes and behaviour concerning abatement policies and personal involvement, Transp. Res D, 3, 1–18.
  • Golob TF, Horowitz AD, Wachs M. 1979. Attitude–behaviour relationships in travel demand modelling, in Bevavioural travel modelling, (eds. , Hensher D A, Stopher P R), 739–757, London, Croom Helm.
  • Goulias KG, Kim T. 2005. Behavioral dynamics in activity participation, travel, and information and communications technology, in Transportation and traffic theory: flow, dynamics and human interaction, (ed. , Mahmassani HS,) 467–486, Elsevier.
  • Greene WH. 2000. Econometric analysis, 4th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • Greene WH. 2003. LIMDEP version 8.0 users manual, Bellport, NY, Econometric Software, Inc.
  • Hartgen DT, Tanner H. 1970. Individual attitudes and family activities, High Speed Ground Transp. J., 4, 439–467.
  • Isen AM. 2002. Missing in action in the AIM: positive affects facilitation of cognitive flexibility, innovation, and problem solving, Psychol. Inq., 13, 57–65.
  • Kapur A, Bhat CR. 2007. On modeling adults daily time use by activity purpose and accompaniment arrangement, Transp. Res. Rec., 2021, 18–27.
  • Koppelman FS, Pas EI. 1980. Travel choice behaviour: models of perceptions, feelings, preference, and choice, Transp. Res. Rec., 765, 26–33.
  • Krueger N. 1993. The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perception of new venture feasibility and desirability, Entrep. Theory Pract., 18, (1), 5–21.
  • Krueger N, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL. 2000. Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions, J. Bus. Venturing, 15, 411–432.
  • Lovelock CH. 1975. A market segmentation approach to transit planning, modeling, and management, Transp. Res. Forum Proc., 16, 247–258.
  • McClelland DC. 1961. The achieving society, New York, Van Nostrand.
  • Misra S, Kumar SE. 2000. Resourcefulness: a proximal conceptualization of entrepreneurial behavior, J. Entrep., 9, (2), 135–153.
  • Mokhtarian P. 2009. If telecommunication is such a good substitute for travel, why does congestion continue to get worse? Transp. Lett., 1, (1), 1–17.
  • Mosa AI. 2006. Activity based modeling: intra-household interaction, attitudes, and telecommunication, Master Dissertation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Recker WW, Golob TB. 1976. An attitudinal modal choice model, Transp. Res., 10, 299–310.
  • Rotter JB. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychol Monogr, 80, (1), 1–28.
  • Schiffman LG, Kanuk LL. 2004. Consumer behavior; USA, Pearson.
  • Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. 2008. An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey, Transportation, 35, (3), 301–328.
  • Tardiff TJ. 1976. Causal inferences involving transportation attitudes and behavior, Transp. Res., 11, 397–404.
  • Townsend TA. 1987. The effects of HH characteristics on the multi-day time allocations and travel activity patterns of HHs and their members, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Vovsha P, Bradley M. 2006. Advanced activity-based models in context of planning decisions, Transp. Res. Rec., 1981, 34–41.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.