Optimal annual net income of a containership using CO₂ reduction measures under a marine emissions trading scheme

References

• Adamkiewicz A and Wietrzyk B. 2009. Marine turbine application in waste heat recovery system, J Polish CIMAC. [Online]. Available: http://www.polishcimac.pl/Papers1/2009/001.pdf (Accessed on 20th December, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• AEA. 2008. Greenhouse gas emissions from shipping: trends, projections and abatement potential, London, England, AEA Energy & Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Bäuerle O, Graichen J, Meyer K and Seum S. 2010. Integration of marine transport into the European Emissions Trading System: environment, economic and legal analysis of different options, Germany, Federal Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Burniaux JM, Duval R, Chateau J and Jamet S. 2008. The economics of climate change mitigation, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• CE Delft. 2005. Giving wings to emission trading-inclusion of aviation under the European Emission Trading System (ETS): design and impacts. Netherlands, CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• CE Delft. 2010. Comparison of market-based measures to reduce GHG emissions from shipping, Netherlands, CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett JJ and Winebrake JJ. 2008. Emissions tradeoffs among alternative marine fuels: total fuel cycle analysis of residual oil, marine gas oil, and marine diesel oil, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 58, (4), 538–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett JJ, Wang H and Winebrake JJ. 2009. The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 14, (8), 593–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton P and Kerr S. 2002. Tradable carbon permit auction show and why to auction not grandfather, Energy Policy, 30, 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crist P. 2009. Greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential from international shipping, Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Paper, OECD and ITF.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel YK, Khorasanchi M, Turan O, and Incecik A. 2013, On the importance of antifouling coatings regarding ship resistance and powering. [Online]. Available: http://www.lowcarbonshipping.co.uk/files/ucl_admin/LCS%202013/Demirel_et_al.pdf (accessed on 12 May, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Drewry. 2013. Sea & air shipper insight (04), London, England, Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Eide MS, Endresen Ø, Skjong R, Longva T and Alvik S. 2009. Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping, Marit. Policy Manage., 36, (4), 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goers SR, Wagner AF and Wegmayr J. 2010. New and existing market-based instruments for climate change policy, Environ. Econ. Policy Stud., 12, (1–2), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hao J, Qiang Z, Shi J, Suo S and Xiao L. 2012. Research on response measures for ship emission reduction and energy saving, Ship Sci. Technol., 34, (9), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Shi X, Wu J, Hu H and Zhao J. 2013. How will the marine emissions trading scheme influence the profit and co2 emissions of a containership, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 8197, 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2009a. Second IMO GHG study, MEPC 59/INF.10, London, England, IMO.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2009b. Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship energy efficiency operational indicator (EEOI), MEPC.1.Circ. 684, London, England, IMO.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2009c. Interim guidelines on measure of calculation of the energy efficiency design index for new ships, MEPC.1.Circ.681, London, England, IMO.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper M, Stahlbock S and Voß S. 2012. Slow steaming in container shipping, Proc. 45th Hawaii Int. Conf. on ‘System science’, Maui, 4/7 January 2012, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Wallace EO and William AP. 2007. Decentralization in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and lessons for global policy, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 1, (1), 112–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kageson P. 2007. Linking CO2 emissions from international shipping to the EU ETS, Germany, Federal Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kageson P. 2008. The maritime emissions trading scheme. [Online]. Available: http://www.natureassociates.se/pdf/METSfinal.pdf (Acceseed on 15 May, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kontovas C and Psaraftis HN. 2011a. Carbon dioxide emissions valuation and its uses, Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics 2011. 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Kontovas C and Psaraftis HN. 2011b. Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policy, Marit. Policy Manage., 38, (4), 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman T. 2009. Evaluating carbon taxes as an energy conservation and emission reduction, Transp. Res. Rec., 2139, 125–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAN Diesel & Turbo. 2005. Thermo Efficiency System (TES) for reduction of fuel consumption and CO2 emission, Munich, Germany, MAN.
   Google Scholar
• Miola A, Ciuffo B, Giovine E and Marra M. 2010. Regulating air emissions from ships: the state of the art on measureologies, technologies and policy options, JRC Reference Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Miola A, Marra M and Ciuffo B. 2011. Designing a climate change policy for the international maritime transport sector: market-based measures and technological options for global and regional policy actions, Energy Policy, 39, (9), 5490–5498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdan S and Azapagic A. 2011. Carbon trading: current schemes and future developments, Energy Policy, 39, (10), 6040–6054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre F and Lisa S. 2014. Impact analysis on shipping lines and European ports of a cap- and-trade system on CO2 emissions in maritime transport, Marit. Policy Manage., 41, (1), 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN. 2012. Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a review, WMU J. Marit. Aff., 11, (2), 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA and Kakalis NMP. 2009. Speed reduction as an emissions reduction measure for fast ships, Paper Presented at the 10th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Athens, 5/8 October, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Schinas O and Stefanakos CN. 2012. Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators, Transp. Res. Part C, 25, 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu JB and Li F. 2013. Market competition and greening transportation of airlines under the Emission Trading Scheme: a case of duopoly market, Transportation Science, 1–11, Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2013.0473.
   Google Scholar
• Shi X, Zhang Y and Voß S. 2013. Actions applied by Chinese shipping companies under greenhouse gas Emissions Trading Scheme, Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist., 5, 463–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu G, Liang Y, Wei H, Tian H, Zhao J and Liu L. 2013. A review of waste heat recovery on two-stroke IC engine aboard ships, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 19, 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavins RN. 2001. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, 01-58, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Wik C and Hallback B. 2007. Utilisation of 2-stage turbo charging as an emission reduction means on a wärtsilä 4-stroke medium-speed diesel engine, Proc. 25th CIMAC World Congress on Combustion Engines, 21–24, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W and Li J. 2009. The application of the silicone painting in ship, Total Corros. Control, 27, (7), 63–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. 2010. An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect, Appl. Energy, 87, 1804–1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar