Mode choice modeling for long-distance travel

References

• Abdelwahab WM. 1991. Transferability of intercity disaggregate mode choice models in Canada, Can. J. Civil Eng., 18, 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar DP, Barbeau SJ, Labrador MA, Perez AJ, Perez RA and Winters PL. 2007. Quantifying position accuracy of multimodal data from global positioning system-enabled cell phones, Transp. Res. Rec., 1992, 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axhausen KW. 2000. Preparing for the long of it: methodological research for an European survey of long distance travel, TRB Conference: personal travel: the long and short of it, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Baik H, Trani AA, Hinze N, Swingle H, Ashiabor S and Seshadri A. 2008. Forecasting model for air taxi, commercial airline, and automobile demand in the United States, Transp. Res. Rec., 2052, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister D and Berechman Y. 2001. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth, J. Transp. Geogr., 9, 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Başar G and Bhat C. 2004. A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: an application to the San Francisco Bay Area, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 38, 889–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat C. 1997. An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel, Transp. Sci., 31, 34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. 1995. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity mode choice, Trans. Res. Part B Methodol., 29, 471–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone EA, Buck AJ and Hakim S. 2006. Determinants of airport choice in a multi-airport region, Atl. Econ. J., 34, 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Button K. 2010. Transport economics, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dargay J and Clark S. 2010. The determinants of long distance travel: an analysis based on the British national travel survey, World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• De Lapparent M, Frei A and Axhausen KW. 2009. Choice of mode for long distance travel: current SP-based models from three European countries, ETC 2009, Leeuwenhorst.
   Google Scholar
• Forinash CV and Koppelman FS. 1993. Application and interpretation of nested logit models of intercity mode choice, Transp. Res. Rec., 1413, 98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson A. 1981. Disaggregate model of mode choice in intercity travel, Transp. Res. Rec., 835, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Grimal R. 2010. Spatial analysis of long-distance mobility, World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Hess S and Polak JW. 2005. Mixed logit modelling of airport choice in multi-airport regions, J. Air Transp. Manage., 11, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess S and Polak JW. 2006a. Airport, airline and access mode choice in the San Francisco Bay area, Pap. Reg. Sci., 85, 543–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess S and Polak JW. 2006b. Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: a case-study of the Greater London area, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 42, 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess S, Adler T and Polak JW. 2007. Modelling airport and airline choice behaviour with the use of stated preference survey data, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 43, 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J, Paaswell RE and Yali A.-M. 2003. Impacts of extreme events on intercity passenger travel behavior: the September 11th experience, impacts of and human response to the September 11, 2001 disasters: what research tells us. Boulder, CO, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center (University of Colorado). Special Publication No. 39.
   Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J, Xu N and Bhat C. 2012. An assessment of the impacts of inspection times on the airline industry's market share after September 11th, J. Air Transp. Manage., 23, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppelman FS. 1983. Predicting transit ridership in response to transit service changes, J. Transp. Eng., 109, 548–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppelman FS and Wen C.-H. 2000. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 34, 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography, J. Polit. Econ., 99, 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMondia J, Snell T and Bhat CR. 2010. Traveler behavior and values analysis in the context of vacation destination and travel mode choices European Union case study, Transp. Res. Rec., 140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DB, Klein LA and Camus G. 1999. Induced traffic and induced demand, Transp. Res. Rec., 1659, 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel B, Gaudry M and Rothengatter W. 1997. A disaggregate Box–Cox logit mode choice model of intercity passenger travel in Germany and its implications for high-speed rail demand forecasts, Ann. Reg. Sci., 31, 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller EJ. 2004. The trouble with intercity travel demand models, Transp. Res. Rec., 1895, 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Moeckel R and Donnelly R. 2011. Nationwide estimate of long-distance travel (NELDT). Generating external trips for local travel demand models, Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Forum, 10–12 March 2011, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Richter C and Keuchel S. 2012. Modelling mode choice in passenger transport with integrated hierarchical information integration, J. Choice Modell., 5, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout R and Miller EJ. 1982. A disaggregate logit model of intercity passenger mode choice, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada Annual Conference, Halifax, N.S., 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M. 2010. Is light rail more attractive to users than bus transit? Arguments based on cognition and rational choice, Transp. Res. Rec., 2144, 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer RG. 2012. Long-distance and rural travel transferable parameters for statewide travel forecasting models, in National cooperative highway research program, (ed. Transportation Research Board), Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Bhat CR and Holguín-Veras J. 2006. Empirical analysis of the impact of security perception on intercity mode choice. A panel rank-ordered mixed logit model, Transp. Res. Rec., 1942, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Weis C and Axhausen KW. 2009. Induced travel demand: evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model, Res. Transp. Econ., 25, 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wen C.-H and Koppelman FS. 2001. The generalized nested logit model, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 35, 627–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson FR, Damodaran S and Innes JD. 1990. Disaggregate mode choice models for intercity passenger travel in Canada, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 17, 184–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao E and Morikawa T. 2005. A study of an integrated intercity travel demand model, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 39, 367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar