1,535
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Measuring self-esteem after spinal cord injury: Development, validation and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Self-esteem item bank and short form

, , &

References

  • Heppner W, Kernis M. High self-esteem: multiple forms and their outcomes. In: Schwartz S, Luyckx K, Vignoles V eds. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, Vols 1 and 2. New York, New York: Springer; 2011:329–355.
  • James W. Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt (reprinted by Thoemmes Press, 1999); 1890.
  • Rosenberg M. The association of self-esteem and anxiety. J Psychiatr Res 1962;1(2):135–52.
  • Brown JD, Dutton KA, Cook KE. From the top down: self-esteem and self-evaluation. Cogn Emot 2001;15(5):615–31.
  • Brown JD, Marshall MA. Self-esteem and emotion: some thoughts about feelings. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001;27(5):575–84.
  • Hermann AD, Leonardelli GJ, Arkin RM. Self-doubt and self-esteem: a threat from within. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002;28(3):395–408.
  • Brown JD. High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: once more with feeling. Cogn Emot 2010;24(8):1389–404.
  • Keppel CC, Crowe SF. Changes to body image and self-esteem following stroke in young adults. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2000;10(1):15–31.
  • Miyahara M, Piek J. Self-esteem of children and adolescents with physical disabilities: quantitative evidence from meta-analysis. J Dev Phys Disabil 2006;18(3):219–34.
  • Cooper-Evans S, Alderman N, Knight C, Oddy M. Self-esteem as a predictor of psychological distress after severe acquired brain injury: an exploratory study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18(5–6):607–26.
  • Juth V, Smyth JM, Santuzzi AM. How do you feel? – Self-esteem predicts affect, stress, social interaction, and symptom severity during daily life in patients with chronic illness. J Health Psychol 2008;13(7):884–94.
  • Kiera S, Stachow R, Petermann F, Tiedjen U. Medical inpatient rehabilitation influences on self-esteem and self-efficacy of chronically III adolescents. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2010;49(4):248–55.
  • Vickery CD, Evans CC, Lee JE, Sepehri A, Jabeen LN. Multilevel modeling of self-esteem change during acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2009;54(4):372–80.
  • Peter C, Muller R, Cieza A, Geyh S. Psychological resources in spinal cord injury: a systematic literature review. Spinal Cord 2012;50(3):188–201.
  • Marini I, Rogers L, Slate JR, Vines C. Self-esteem differences among persons with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Couns Bull 1995;38(3):198–206.
  • van Leeuwen CMC, Kraaijeveld S, Lindeman E, Post MWM. Associations between psychological factors and quality of life ratings in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2012;50(3):174–87.
  • Geyh S, Nick E, Stirnimann D, Ehrat S, Michel F, Peter C, et al. Self-efficacy and self-esteem as predictors of participation in spinal cord injury-an ICF-based study. Spinal Cord 2012;50(9):699–706.
  • Buunk BP. Comparison direction and comparison dimension among disabled individuals: toward a refined conceptualization of social comparison under stress. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995;21(4):316–30.
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954;7(2):117–40.
  • Schulz R, Decker S. Long-term adjustment to physical disability: the role of social support, perceived control and self-blame. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;48:1162–72.
  • Buunk AP, Zurriaga R, Gonzalez P. Social comparison, coping and depression in people with spinal cord injury. Psychol Health 2006;21(6):791–807.
  • Neugebauer A, Katz PP, Pasch LA. Effect of valued activity disability, social comparisons, and satisfaction with ability on depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol 2003;22(3):253–62.
  • Chang CH, Ferris DL, Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Tan JA. Core self-evaluations: a review and evaluation of the literature. Jr Management 2012;38(1):81–128.
  • Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Revised edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press; 1989.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al.. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury – Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):257–69.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Choi SW, Gershon R, Heinemann AW, et al. Methodology for the development and calibration of the SCI-QOL item banks. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):270–87.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate D, Heinemann AW, Amtmann D, et al. Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):S44–51.
  • Cella D, Nowinski C, Peterman A, Victorson D, Miller D, Lai JS, et al. The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92 (10, Suppl.):S28–36.
  • Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
  • Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof 2005;28(2):212–32.
  • MetaMetrics. The LEXILE framework for reading. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics Inc; 1995.
  • American Spinal Injury Association. Reference manual for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association; 2003.
  • Samejima F, van der Liden W, Hambleton R. The graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1996, p. 85–100.
  • Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item tesponse theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J Stat Softw 2011;39(8):1–30.
  • Gershon R, Rothrock NE, Hanrahan RT, Jansky LJ, Harniss M, Riley W. The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: assessment Center. Qual Life Res 2010;19(5):677–85.
  • Rosenberg M, Schooler C, Schoenbach C, Rosenberg F. Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Am Sociol Rev 1995;60:141–56.