Effective preservation decision strategies

References

• Ashley-Smith, J. 1994. Let's be Honest. Talk presented at the IIC conference, Preventive Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research Ottawa, Canada September 15th 1994 [accessed 22 July 2014]. Available at: <http://cool.conservation-us.org/byauth/ashley-smith/honest.html>
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J. 1999. Risk Assessment for Object Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J. 2000. Developing Professional Uncertainty. In: A. Roy & P. Smith, eds. Tradition and Innovation, Advances in Conservation, Contributions to the Melbourne Congress 10–14 October 2000. London: IIC, pp. 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. K. 2014. Environmental Conditions for the Safeguarding of Collections: A Background to the Current Debate on the Control of Relative Humidity and Temperature. Studies in Conservation, 59(4): 205–12. doi: 10.1179/2047058414Y.0000000141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, N.S. & Snickars, E. eds. 2001. Rational Decision-Making in the Preservation of Cultural Property. Berlin: Dahlem University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. & Ritov, I. 2004. Omission Bias, Individual Differences, and Normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(2): 74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassar, M. 1998. Cost/Benefits Appraisals for Collection Care. London: Museums and Galleries Commission [accessed 10 October 2014]. Available at: <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sustainableheritage-save/cost_benefits.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L.A.Jr. 2013. Improving Risk Analysis. New York: Springer, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.
   Google Scholar
• Darwiche, A. 2009. Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1999. Curation Options Project, Western and Mid-Atlantic States [accessed 1 May 2015]. Available at: <http://azmemory.azlibrary.gov/cdm/ref/collection/feddocs/id/2018>
   Google Scholar
• Dorner, D. 1996. The Logic of Failure. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S.E. 1986. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Glasgow: Bell and Bain.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., Miles, R.F.Jr. & von Winterfeldt, D. eds. 2007. Advances in Decision Analysis: from Foundations to Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. & von Winterfeldt, D. 1987. Public Values in Risk Debates. Risk Analysis, 7(2): 141–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00979.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B.T. & Stanovich, K.E. 2013. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3): 223–41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankish, K. & Evans, J. eds. 2009. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R., Dudley, N. & Blacktop, J. 2002. How Informed is Consent? Understanding of Pictorial and Verbal Probability Information by Medical Inpatients. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 78: 543–44 [accessed 10 October 2014]. Available at: <http://pmj.bmj.com/content/78/923/543.full> doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.923.543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. & The ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giove, S., Rosato, P. & Breil, M. 2010. An Application of Multicriteria Decision Making to Built Heritage. The Redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17(3–4): 85–99. doi: 10.1002/mcda.455
   Google Scholar
• Gwilt, D. 2008. The Collections Care and Access Project: Balancing Demands on Collections in Cost. In: D. Saunders, J.H. Townsend & S. Woodcock, eds. Conservation and Access: Contributions to the London Congress 15–19 September 2008. London: IIC, pp. 192–95.
   Google Scholar
• Haimes, Y.Y. 1998. Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hassler, U. & Kohler, N. 2000. Cultural and Environmental Long Term Strategies for the Built Environment. In: N.S. Baer & F. Snickars, eds. Rational Decision-Making in the Preservation of Cultural Propert: Dahlem Workshop Report 86. Berlin: Dahlem University Press, pp. 235–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hedley, G. 1993. On Humanism, Aesthetics and the Cleaning of Paintings. In: C. Villers, ed. Measured Opinions. London: UKIC, pp. 152–66.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 2011. Reflections on Decision Making in Conservation. In: J. Bridgland, ed. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 16th Triennial Meeting, Preprints. Almada, Portugal: Critério – Produção Gráfica, Lda, No. 1509.
   Google Scholar
• Hertwig, R., Fanselow, C. & Hoffrage, U. 2003. Hindsight Bias: How Knowledge and Heuristics Affect our Reconstruction of the Past. Memory, 11(4): 357–77. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsee, C.K. Loewenstein, G.F. Blount, S. & Bazerman, M.H. 1999. Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluation of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5): 576–90. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2003. A Perspective on Judgement and Choice. American Psychologist, 58(9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. 1982. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory an Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263–91. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. & Garrick, B. J. 1981. On the Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1): 11–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Haimes, Y.Y. & Garrick, B.J. 2001. Fitting Hierarchical Holographic Modeling into the Theory of Scenario Structuring and a Resulting Refinement to the Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 21(5): 807–19. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.215153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene, S. 1996. Managing Conservation in Museums. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, S. & Orton, C. 1985. The Stability of Treated Archaeological Iron: An Assessment. Studies in Conservation, 30(3): 136–42.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. 1999. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. 2009. Streetlights and Shadows. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Macedo, M.F. & Waller, R.R. 2011. Abstracts of the International Symposium and Workshop on Cultural Property Risk Analysis. Ottawa: Protect Heritage Corp. [accessed 23 April 2013]. Available at. <http://protectheritage.com/Lisbon2011/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Symposium-Abstracts.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Martignon, L.F. 2001. Principles of Adaptive Decision Making. In: N.S. Baer & F. Snickars, eds. Rational Decision-Making in the Preservation of Cultural Property. Dahlem Workshop Report 86. Berlin: Dahlem University Press, pp. 263–75.
   Google Scholar
• MacGillivray, B.H. 2014. Heuristics Structure and Pervade Formal Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, 34(4): 771–87. doi: 10.1111/risa.12136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green [accessed 16 November 2014]. Available at: <http://www.ess.inpe.br/courses/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=wiki:user:andre.zopelari:thinking_in_systems_a_primer.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Merkelsen, H. 2011. Institutionalized Ignorance as a Precondition for Rational Risk Expertise. Risk Analysis, 31(7): 1083–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01576.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, S. 2014. The Power of History in the Analysis of Collection Risks from Climate Fluctuations and Light. In: J. Bridgland, ed. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 17th Triennial Meeting, Preprints. Paris: International Council of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, B.R., Lagnado, D.A. & Shanks, D. 2007. Straight Choices The Psychology of Decision Making. Cornwall: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell, E. 2012. On ‘Black Swans’ and ‘Perfect Storms’: Risk Analysis and Management when Statistics are not Enough. Risk Analysis, 32(11): 1823–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzel, B. 2005. The RIBA Project: A Climate Strategy for Paper Based Archives at the Victoria and Albert Museum. In: J. Bridgland, ed. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 14th Triennial Meeting, Preprints. London: James & James, vol. II, pp. 681–88.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 1999. A Model for an Analytic-Deliberative Process in Risk Management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(18): 3049–55. doi: 10.1021/es981283m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R. & Winkworth, K. 2009. Significance 2.0 Collections. Adelaide: Council of Australia [accessed 16 November 2014]. Available at: <http://arts.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources-publications/significance-2.0/pdfs/significance-2.0.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Shanteau, J. 1992. Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 53: 252–66. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloggett, R. 2009. Expanding the Conservation Canon: Assessing Cross-cultural and Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Conservation. Studies in Conservation, 54(3): 170–83. doi: 10.1179/sic.2009.54.3.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science, 236(4799): 280–85. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K.E. 1999. Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K.E. 2009. Decision Making and Rationality in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K.E. 2011. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C. & Fineberg, V. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization, National Academy Press [accessed 10 October 2014]. Available at: <http://nihbrp.com/NEIDL20Administrative20Record/Misc20Articles20Regarding20Risk/NRC20Report20understanding20risk%201996.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. 2013. Causes and Extent of Variation in Collection Condition Survey Data. Studies in Conservation, 58(2): 95–106. doi: 10.1179/2047058412Y.0000000060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. 2005. An Integrated Approach to Risk Assessments and Condition Surveys. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 44(2): 127–41. [accessed 10 October 2014]. Available at: <http://cool.conservation-us.org/coolaic/jaic/articles/jaic44-02-006.html> doi: 10.1179/019713605806082365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P.E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. Nara Document on Authenticity. United Nations Educational Cultural and Scientific Organization [accessed 4 July 2015]. Available at: <http://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. 2002. A Risk Model for Collection Preservation. In: R. Vontobel, ed. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 13^th Triennial Meeting, Preprints. London: James & James, pp. 102–07.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. 2003. Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model: Development and Application to Preventive Conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Göteborg Studies in Conservation 13. Göteborg: Göteborg Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. 2008a. Cultural Property Risk Assessment: Matching Approach with Purpose. In: J. Bridgland, ed. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 15^th Triennial Meeting, Preprints. London: James & James, pp. 815–19.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. 2008b. Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Applying the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model to the Canadian Museum of Nature. In: I. Linkov, E. Ferguson & V.S. Magar, eds. Environmental Security: Real Time and Deliberative Decision Making. Dordrecht: Springer, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C, pp. 179–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. 1986. The Nature of Conservation: A Race Against Time. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier-Rowe, A., Fry, C. & Stanley, B. 2008. Power to Prioritize: Applying Risk and Condition Information to the Management of Dispersed Collections. In: D. Saunders, J.H. Townsend & S. Woodcock, eds. Conservation and Access: Contributions to the London Congress 15–19 September, 2008. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, pp. 186–91.
   Google Scholar