Relationship between speech intelligibility and listener effort in Malayalam-speaking individuals with hypokinetic dysarthria

References

• Beukelman D.R., Childes J., Carrell T., Funk T., Ball L.J., Pattee G.L. 2011. Perceived attention allocation of listeners who transcribe the speech of speakers with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Speech Communication, 53(6): 801–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie S.A., McAuliffe M.J., Liss J.M. 2012. Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55: 290–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote-Reschny K.J., Hodge M.M. 2010. Listener effort and response time when transcribing words spoken by children with dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech – Language Pathology, 18: 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais P.A., Adlington L.M., Evans K.L. 2011. Intelligibility, comprehensibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech by older and younger listeners. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 19(4): 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley F.L., Aronson A.E., Brown J.R. 1969a. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12: 246–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley F.L., Aronson A.E., Brown J.R. 1969b. Clusters of deviant speech features in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12: 462–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley F.L., Aronson A.E., Brown J.R. 1975. Motor speech disorders. Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• D'silva O. 2006. Protocol for assessment of speech intelligibility and speech naturalness intelligibility and speech naturalness in dysarthrics in Kannada [Unpublished Master's dissertation], India: University of Mysore.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy J.R. 2005. Motor speech disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer D.J. 2010. Relationships between speech intelligibility and word articulation scores in children with hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53: 1075–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukusako Y., Monoi H., Tatsumi I.F., Kumai K., Hijikata N., Hirose H. 1983. Analysis of characteristics of dysarthric speech based on auditory impressions. Japanese Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 24: 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe E., Low E.L. 2002. Durational variability in speech and rhythm class hypothesis. In: Gussenhoven C., Warner N., (eds.) Laboratory phonology (vol. 7). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 515–546.
   Google Scholar
• Green P., Carmichael J. 2004. Revisiting dysarthria assessment intelligibility metrics. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing; October 4–8, International Convention Center Jeju, Jeju Island, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks C.B., Tharpe A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45: 573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehn M.M., Yahr M.D. 1967. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology, 17: 427–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K.C. 2007. Effects of speech stimuli and dysarthria severity on intelligibility scores and listener confidence ratings for speakers with cerebral palsy. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 59: 306–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K.C. 2008. The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51: 562–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler D., Van Lancker D. 2002. Effect of speech task on intelligibility in dysarthria: a case study of Parkinson's disease. Brain and Language, 80: 449–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasner E., Yorkston K. 2005. Speech intelligibility in HD and ALS dysarthria: the everyday listener's perspective. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2): 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss J.M., Spitzer S.M., Caviness J.N., Adler C., Edwards B.E. 2000. Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 107: 3415–3424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss J.M., Utianski R., Lansford K. 2013. Crosslinguistic application of English-centric rhythm descriptors in motor speech disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 65: 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys S.L., Davis M.H., Bradlow A.R., Scott S.K. 2012. Speech recognition in adverse listening conditions: a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27: 953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle K.F., Eadie T.L. 2012. Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45(3): 235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brian S., Packman A., Onslow M., Cream A., O'Brian N., Bastock K. 2003. Is listener comfort a viable construct in stuttering research? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46: 503–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni D. 1982. Perception of speech: the human listener as a cognitive interface. Speech Technology, 1: 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B., Hafter E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52: 1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savithri S.R., Jayaram M., Kedarnath D., Goswami S. 2007. Speech rhythm in Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers of Research on Speech and Music. Mysore, India, January 8–9, 2007, Mysore, AIISH, p. 170–174.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden K., Liss J.M. 1995. The influence of familiarity on judgments of treated speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(2): 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden K., Wilding G. 2011. Effects of speaking task on intelligibility in Parkinson's disease. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(6): 155–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walshe M., Miller N., Leahy M., Murray A. 2008. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43: 633–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill T.L., Ma J.K-Y., Lee A.S-Y. 2003. Perceptual characteristics of Cantonese hypokinetic dysarthria. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17: 265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill T.L., Wong C. 2006. Contributing factors to listener effort for dysarthric speech. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 14: 335–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill T.L., Wong C. 2007. Effect of intensive voice treatment on tone language speakers with Parkinson's disease. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21: 919–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K.M., Beukelman D.R. 1981. Communication efficiency of dysarthric speakers as measured by sentence intelligibility and speaking rate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46: 296–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yorkston K.M., Beukelman D.R. 1983. The influence of judge familiarization with the speaker on dysarthric speech intelligibility. In: Berry W., (ed.) Clinical dysarthria. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, p. 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K.M., Beukelman D.R., Strand E.A., Bell K.R. 1999. Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Beukelman D., Traynor C. 1984. Assessment of intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Austin: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar