Correlates of older adults’ discrimination of acoustic properties in speech

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1996. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. (Technical Report). Available from www.asha.org/policy. doi:10.1044/policy.TR1996-00241.
   Google Scholar
• Andringa S., Olsthoorn N., van Beuningen C., Schoonen R., Hulstijn J. 2012. Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: an individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62: 49–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen H., Piepenbrok R., Gulikers L. 1995. The CELEX database consortium (CD-ROM). Linguistic data. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen R.H. 2012. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr D.J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H.J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68: 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. 2012. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (Version 0.999-0). Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beijer L.J., Rietveld A.C., van Stiphout A.J. 2011. Auditory discrimination as a condition for E-learning based Speech Therapy: a proposal for an auditory discrimination test (ADT) for adult dysarthric speakers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44( 6): 701–718. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijer L.J., Rietveld T.C.M., van Beers M.M.A., Slangen R.M.L., van den Heuvel H., de Swart B.J.M., et al. 2010. E-learning-based speech therapy: a web application for speech training. Telemedicine Journal and E-health, 16: 177–180. doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman A. 1989. Speech perception by the hearing impaired [ doctoral dissertation]. Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan D.M., Barker L.M. 2008. Human factors in the development and implementation of telerehabilitation systems. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14( 2): 55–58. doi:10.1258/jtt.2007.007040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff N., Hamburger C.D. 1967. Study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68( 6): 430–445. doi:10.1037/h0025178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). 1988. Speech understanding and aging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83: 859–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook R.D., Weisberg S. 1982. Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cox L.C., McCoy S.L., Tun P.A., Wingfield A. 2008. Monotic auditory processing disorder tests in the older adult population. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19( 4): 293–308. doi:10.3766/Jaaa.19.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Tweed T.S., Klein B.E., Klein R., Mares-Perlman J.A., et al. 1998. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148: 879–886. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnings I. 2012. An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research, 28: 369–382. doi:10.1177/0267658312443651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Swart B.J.M., Willemse S.C., Maassen B.A.M., Horstink M.W.I.M. 2003. Improvement of voicing in patients with Parkinson's disease by speech therapy. Neurology, 60: 498–500. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000044480.95458.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogerty D., Humes L.E., Kewley-Port D. 2010. Auditory temporal-order processing of vowel sequences by young and elderly listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127: 2509–2520. doi:10.1121/1.3316291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole S.E. 1999. Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3( 11): 410–419. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01388-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B., Schneider J., Hartley D., Teber E., McMahon C.M., Leeder S.R., et al. 2011. Incidence and predictors of hearing aid use and ownership among older adults with hearing loss. Annals of Epidemiology, 21( 7): 497–506. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanania E., Shikhani M. 1986. Interrelationships among 3 tests of language proficiency – standardized Esl, Cloze, and Writing. Tesol Quarterly, 20( 1): 97–109. doi:10.2307/3586391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris K.C., Eckert M.A., Ahlstrom J.B., Dubno J.R. 2010. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hearing Research, 264: 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. 2005. Do ‘auditory processing’ tests measure auditory processing in the elderly? Ear and Hearing, 26: 109–119. doi:10.1097/00003446-200504000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Dubno J.R., Gordon-Salant S., Lister J.J., Cacace A.T., Cruickshanks K.J., et al. 2012. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23( 8): 635–666. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.8.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idrizbegovic E., Hederstierna C., Dahlquist M., Kampfe Nordstrom C., Jelic V., Rosenhall U. 2011. Central auditory function in early Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment. Age and Ageing, 40( 2): 249–254. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse E., Adank P. 2012. Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65: 1563–1585. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd G.R., Watson C.S., Gygi B. 2007. Individual differences in auditory abilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122: 418–435. doi:10.1121/1.2743154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe M.J., Gibson E.M., Kerr S.E., Anderson T., LaShell P.J. 2013. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners’ processing of dysarthric speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134( 2): 1358–1368. doi:10.1121/1.4812764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B., Kaplan D. 1985. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38( 2): 171–189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neger T.M., Rietveld T., Janse E. 2014. Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:628. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00628.
   Google Scholar
• Noble W., Gatehouse S. 2004. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43( 2): 100–114. doi:10.1080/14992020400050015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou A., Strelcyk O., Dau T. 2011. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise. Hearing Research, 280: 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D.C., Reuter-Lorenz P. 2009. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 173–196. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Souza P.E. 2003. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of Audiology, 42, S11–S16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18( 1): 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramig L.O., Countryman S., O'Brien C., Hoehn M., Thompson L. 1996. Intensive speech treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease: short-and long-term comparison of two techniques. Neurology, 47( 6): 1496–1504. doi:10.1212/WNL.47.6.1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Pichora-Fuller M. 2001. Age-related changes in temporal processing: implications for speech perception. Seminars in Hearing, 22( 3): 227–240. doi:10.1055/s-2001-15628.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. 2002. E-prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schroter-Morasch H., Ziegler W. 2005. Rehabilitation of impaired speech function (dysarthria, dysglossia). GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 4: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. 2004. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2014. Grades of hearing impairment. [retrieved 2014 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm L.H., Fisicaro S.A. 2014. What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language, 72: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar