COMPARAISON DE TROIS APPROCHES POUR L’ESTIMATION DE L’INCERTITUDE

COMPARISON OF THREE APPROACHES FOR UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION

R. D. MariniLaboratoire de Chimie Analytique, Institut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, CHU, B36, B-4000 Liège, Belgique

P. ChiapLaboratoire d’Analyse des Médicaments Institut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, CHU, B36, B-4000Liège, Belgique

B. BoulangerLilly Development Center Eli Lilly and Company, Rue Granbonpré 11, B-1348 Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgique

S. RudazLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical ChemistryUniversité de Genève, 20, Bd d’Yvoy, 1211, Genève 4, Suisse

E. RozetLaboratoire de Chimie Analytique, Institut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, CHU, B36, B-4000 Liège, Belgique

J. CrommenLaboratoire d’Analyse des Médicaments Institut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, CHU, B36, B-4000Liège, Belgique

Ph. HubertLaboratoire de Chimie AnalytiqueInstitut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, Avenue de l’Hôpital, 1, CHU, Bat. B36, B-4000 Liège, Belgique. Tel. : + 32 (0)4 366 4316, Fax : + 32 (0)4 366 4317, E-mail : [email protected]

show all

REFERENCES

ISO/DTS 21748 (2003) Guide to the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation, ISO, Geneva.
Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization, Guide for the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1993.
Google Scholar
Analytical Methods Committee, Analyst 120 (1995) 2303 – 8.
Google Scholar
Marini R. D. Chiap P., Boulanger B., Dewé W., Hubert Ph., Crommen J. LC method for the simultaneous determination of R-timolol and other closely related impurities in S-timolol maleate: optimization by use of an experimental design. J. Sep. Sci. 2003, 26, 809–17.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Feinberg M. Boulanger B., Dewé W., Hubert Ph. New advances in method validation and measurement uncertainty aimed at improving the quality of chemical data. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 380, 502–14.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

COMPARAISON DE TROIS APPROCHES POUR L’ESTIMATION DE L’INCERTITUDE

COMPARISON OF THREE APPROACHES FOR UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION

REFERENCES

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

COMPARAISON DE TROIS APPROCHES POUR L’ESTIMATION DE L’INCERTITUDE

COMPARISON OF THREE APPROACHES FOR UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION

REFERENCES

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date