THE PRE-ANALYTICAL CHALLENGES OF ROUTINE URINALYSIS

REFERENCES

• Fogazzi GB, Cameron JS, Ritz E, et al. The history of urinary mi-croscopy to the end of the 19th century. Am J Nephrol 1994; 14:452–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Steyaert RS, et al. Automated Flow Cytometry Compared with an Automated Dipstick Reader for Urinalysis. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 118–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson DA, Statland BE. Automated urinalysis. Clin Lab Med 1988; 8:449–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howanitz PJ, Howanitz J H. Quality control for the clinical labo-ratory. Clin Lab Med 1983; 3:541–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stankovic AK, DiLauri E. Quality improvements in the pre-ana-lytical phase: focus on urine specimen workflow. Clin Lab Med. 2008; 28: 339–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanghe JR. New screening diagnostic techniques in urinaly-sis. Acta Clin Belg 2007; 62: 155–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouri TT, Fogazzi G, Grant V, et al. European Urinalysis Guide-lines. Scand J Lab Invest 2000; 60: 1–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinda AK, Saxena S, Guleria S, et al. Diagnosis of glomerular haematuria: role of dysmorphic red cell, G1 cell and bright-field microscopy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997; 57: 203–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassett RG, Horgan BA, Mathew TH. Detection of glomerular bleeding by phase-contrast microscopy. Lancet 1982; i: 1432–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamoto Y, Tomita M, Akamine M, et al. Differentiation of he-maturia using a uniquely shaped red cell. Nephron 1993; 64: 32–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guder WG, Ivandic M, Hofmann W. Physiopathology of pro-teinuria and laboratory diagnostic strategy based on single protein analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 935–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute). Urinalysis; ap-proved guideline. Third edition. 2009: GP16–A3.
   Google Scholar
• Norden CW, Kass EH. Bacteriuria of pregnancy -- a critical ap-praisal. Ann Rev Med 1968; 19:431–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AP, Robinson IE, Beard RW. Some factors affecting bac-terial colony counts in urinary infection. Br Med J 1967; 1:400–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogazzi GB, Verdesca S, Garigali G. Urinalysis: core curriculum 2008. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 1052–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattenbury JM, Allen JC. Sample contamination by test strips. Clin Chem 1987; 33:414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanoine JP, Bourdoux P, Vo Thi NB, et al. Iodine contamination of Urine Samples by Test Strips. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acker JT, Verstraete AG, Van Hamme MA, et al. Falsely increased urinary caffeine attributable to contamination by urine test strips. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1315–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guder WG, Naranyan S, Wisser H, et al. Samples: from the pa-tient to the laboratory: the impact of preanalytical variables on the quality of laboratory results. Weinheim: Wiley. 2003: 3rd revised edition 1–106.
   Google Scholar
• Nickander KK, Shanholtzer CJ, Peterson LR. Urine Culture Trans-port Tubes: Effect of Sample Volume on BacterialToxicity of the Preservative. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 593–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouri TT, Vuotari L, Pohjavaara S, et al. Preservation of Urine for Flow Cytometric and Visual Microscopic Testing. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 900–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiLLespie T, Fewster J, Masterton RG. The effect of specimen processing delay on borate urine preservation. J Clin Pathol 1999; 52: 95–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy M, Borzomato JK, Newall RG, Kalra PA, Price CP. Protein and albumin-to-creatinine ratios in random urines accurately predict 24 h protein and albumin loss in patients with kidney disease. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Sep 3 .Article in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tencer J, Thysell H, Andersson K, et al. Stability of albumin, protein HC, immunoglobulin G, kappa- and lambda-chain im-munoreactivity, orosomucoid and alpha-1 antitrypsin in urine stored at various conditions. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1994; 54: 199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tencer J, Thysell H, Andersson K, et al. Long-term stability of albumin, protein HC, immunoglobulin G, kappa- and lambda-chain immunoreactivity, orosomucoid and alpha-1 antitrypsin in urine stored at -20°C. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1997; 31:67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasen IS, Reichert Li, de Kat Angelino CM, et al. Quantitative determination of low and high molecular weight proteins in human urine: influence of temperature and storage time. Clin Chem 1999; 45:430–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter IA, Brodie J. Boric acid preservation of urine samples. Brit Med J 1969; 2:353–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouri T, Malminiemi O, Penders J, et al. Limits of preservation of samples for urine strip tests and particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008; 46: 703–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierkegaard H, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Horder M, et al. Falsely negative urinary leukocyte counts due to delayed examination. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1980; 40: 259–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley HL, Warren JW. Urease-positive bacteriuria and ob-struction of long-term urinary catheters. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 2216–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith DP, Musher DM, (tin C. Urease.The primary cause of in-fection-induced urinary stones. lnvestig Urol 1976; 13: 346–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanneman-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of Urine Sediment Examination: a Comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 Automated Flow Cytometer with Routine Manual Diagnosis. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37: 753–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson RA. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer. Clin Chem 1998; 44:92–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo S, Acevedo D, Quinones-Torrelo C, et al. Clinical labo-ratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments. J Clin Lab Anal 2008; 22: 262–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linko S, Kouri T, Toivonen E, et al. Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser. Clin Chim Acta 2006; 372: 54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, et al. Urine sediment examination: A comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual mi-croscopy. Clin Chim Acta 2007; 384:28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar