28
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Assessment of Antero-posterior Dental Base Relationships

, B.D.Sc., F.D.S., M.Orth. & , L.D.S., M.Ch.D., D.Orth.
Pages 285-297 | Received 01 Jul 1990, Published online: 21 Jun 2016

References

  • Angle, E. H. (1907) Malocclusion of the teeth, 7th edn, S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Company, Philadelphia.
  • Backlund, E. (1963) Tooth form and overbite, European Orthodontic Society Transactions, 36, 97–103.
  • Ballard, C. F. (1948) Some bases for aetiology and diagnosis in orthodontics, Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics, 27–38.
  • Ballard, C. F. (1951) Recent work in North America as it affects orthodontic diagnosis and treatment, Dental Record, 71, 85–97.
  • Barnett, D. P. (1975) Variations in the soft tissue profile and their relevance to the clinical assessment of skeletal pattern, British Journal of Orthodontics, 2, 235–238.
  • Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971a) The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 111–127.
  • Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971b) The reliability of headfilm measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 505–517.
  • Beatty, E. J. (1975) A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships, American Journal of Orthodontics, 68, 303–315.
  • Bennett, D. T. and Smales, F. C. (1969) Accuracy of angular measurements obtained from radiographic cephalometric analysis, Journal of Dental Research, 48, 595.
  • Bishara, S. E., Fahl, J. A., and Peterson, L. C. (1983) Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and ‘Wits’ appraisal: clinical implications, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 133–139.
  • Bjork, A. (1947) The face in profile, Svensk Tandlaker Tidsskrift, 40(supplement 5).
  • Bjork, A. (1954) Cephalometric X- ray investigations in dentistry, International Dental Journal, 4, 718–744.
  • Brodie, C. (1941) Behaviour of normal and abnormal facial growth patterns, American Journal of Orthodontics Transactions, 17–31.
  • Chang, S. E. (1987). Assessment of antero-posterior jaw relationship, American Journal of Orthodontics, 92, 117–122.
  • Coben, S. E. (1955). Integration of facial skeletal variants. A serial cephalometric roentgenographic analysis of craniofacial form and growth, American Journal of Orthodontics, 41, 407–434.
  • Downs, W. B. (1948) Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 34, 812–840.
  • Downs, W. B. (1952) The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 38, 162–182.
  • Freeman, R. S. (1950) A radiographic method of analysis of the relation of the structures of the lower face to each other and to the occlusal plane of the teeth, M.S.D. Thesis, Northwestern University, Illinois.
  • Freeman, R. S. (1981) Adjusting ANB angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position, Angle Orthodontist, 51, 162–171.
  • Graber, T. M. (1958) Implementation of the roentgenographic cephalometric technique, American Journal of Orthodontics, 44, 906–932.
  • Gravely, J. F. and Benzies, P. M. (1974) The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry, British Journal of Orthodontics, 1, 95–101.
  • Hellman, M. (1921) Studies on the aetiology of Angle's Class II malocclusal manifestations, American Society of Orthodontics Transactions, 76–95.
  • Hixon, C. (1956) Norm concept and cephalometries, American Journal of Orthodontics, 42, 898–906.
  • Holdaway, R.A. (1956) Changes in relationship of points A and B during orthodontic treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 42, 176–193.
  • Houston, W. J. B. (1975) Assessment of the skeletal pattern from the occlusion of the incisor teeth, British Journal of Orthodontics, 2, 167–169.
  • Hussels, W. and Nanda, R. S. (1984) Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB, American Journal of Orthodontics, 85, 411–423.
  • Hussels, W. and Nanda, R. S. (1986) Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects, American Journal of Orthodontics, 92, 506–510.
  • Jacobson, A. (1975) The ‘Wits’ appraisal of the jaw disharmony, American Journal of Orthodontics, 67, 125–138.
  • Jacobson, A. (1976) Application of ‘Wits’ appraisal, American Journal of Orthodontics, 70, 179–189.
  • Jacobson, A. (1988) Update on the ‘Wits’ appraisal, Angle Orthodontics, 57, 205–219.
  • Jarvinen, S. (1981) A comparison of two angular and two linear measurements used to establish sagittal apical base relationship, European Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 131–134.
  • Jarvinen, S. (1985) An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal, American Journal of Orthodontics, 87, 144–146.
  • Jarvinen, S. (1986a) Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations, American Journal of Orthodontics, 90, 383–387.
  • Jarvinen, S. (1986b) A co-ordinate-free method for analysing skeletal malocclusions, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society, 82, 134–143.
  • Kenneth, R. I. (1983) Cephalometric assessment of antero-posterior dental base relation-ships—a comparison of four methods, M.D.Sc. Thesis, University of Leeds.
  • Kowalski, C. J. and Walker, G. F. (1971) Distribution of the mandibular incisor-mandibular plane angle in ‘normal’ individuals, Journal of Dental Research, 50, 984.
  • Kvam, D. and Krogstad, O. (1969) Variability in tracings of lateral head plates for diagnostic orthodontic purposes—a methodologic study, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 27, 359–369.
  • Margolis, H. (1953) A basic facial pattern and its application in clinical orthodontics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 39, 425–443.
  • Mills, J. R. E. (1964) The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors, British Dental Journal, 120, 355–363.
  • Mills, J. R. E. (1966) The effect on the lower incisors of uncontrolled extractions of lower premolars, European Orthodontic Society Report, 40, 357–370.
  • Mills, J. R. E. (1970) The application and importance of cephalometry in orthodontic treatment, The Orthodontist, 2, 32–47.
  • Mills, J. R. E. (1987) Principles and practice of orthodontics, 2nd edn, Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh.
  • Moore, A. W. (1959) Observations on facial growth and its clinical significance, American Journal of Orthodontics, 45, 399–423.
  • Moorrees, C. F. A. (1953) Normal variation and its bearing on the use of cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic diagnosis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 39, 942–950.
  • Moyers, R. E. and Bookstein, F. L. (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 599–617.
  • Reidel, R. A. (1952) The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion, Angle Orthodontist, 22, 142–145.
  • Richardson, A. (1966) A comparison of traditional and computerised methods of cephalometric analysis, European Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 15–20.
  • Roth, R. (1982) The ‘Wits’ appraisal-its skeletal and dento-alveolar background, European Journal of Orthodontics, 4, 21–28.
  • Simon, P. W. (1926) Orthodontic necessity of gnathostatic diagnosis in orthodontic practice, First International Orthodontic Congress Transactions, 328–329.
  • Stabrun, A. E. and Danielsen, K. (1982) Precision in cephalometric landmark identification, European Journal of Orthodontics, 4, 185–196.
  • Steiner, C. C. (1953) Cephalometrics for you and me, American Journal of Orthodontics, 39, 729–755.
  • Steiner, C. C. (1959) Cephalometrics in clinical practices, Angle Orthodontist, 29, 8–30.
  • Steiner, C. C. (1960) The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Report of a case, American Journal of Orthodontics, 46, 721–735.
  • Sved, A. (1931) An analysis of the most important diagnostic methods used in orthodontia, Angle Orthodontist, 1, 139–160.
  • Taylor, C. M. (1969) Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A and point B and the effect upon ANB, American Journal of Orthodontics, 56, 143–163.
  • Wylie, W. L. and Johnson, E. L. (1952) Rapid evaluation of facial dysplasia in the vertical plane, Journal of Dental Research, 31, 464–465.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.