The Aetiology of Class III Malocclusion Examined by Tensor Analysis

References

• Battagel, J. M. (1992) The aetiological factors of Class III malocclusions and their effect on treatment success, PhD Thesis, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971) The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Contentional angular and linear measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 505–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk, A. (1947) The face in profile. An anthropological X-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts, Svenske Tandalare—Tidskrift, 40, Number 5B supplementum. Lund Berlingska Boktryckeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Book, D. and Lavelle, C. (1988) Changes in craniofacial size and shape with two modes of orthodontic treatment, Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 8, 207–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1981a) Looking at mandibular growth: some new geometric methods, In: Carlson, D. S. (ed.) Craniofacial biology, Monograph No. 10, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1982b) Comment on ‘Issues related to the problem of craniofacial growth’, American Journal of Orthodontics, 79, 442–448.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1982) On the cephalometrics of skeletal change, American Journal of Orthodontics, 82, 177–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1983a) The geometry of craniofacial growth invariants, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 221–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1983b) Measuring treatment effects on craniofacial growth. In: McNamara, J. A., Ribbens, K. and Howe, R. P. (eds) Clinical alteration of the growing face, Monograph No. 14, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1984) Tensor biometrics for changes in cranial shape, Annals of Human Biology, 11, 413–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (1983) British Standard glossary of dental terms, London, BS 4492.
   Google Scholar
• Brustone, C. J., James, R. B., Legan, H., Murphy, G. A. and Norton, L. A. (1978) Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery, Journal of Oral Surgery, 36, 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G. (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students, Interscience Publications, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, U. C. (1970) Morphological variability of skeletal Class III relationships as revealed by cephalometric analysis, Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, W. R. and Goldstein, M. (1984) Multivariate analysis. Methods and applications, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, W. B. (1948) Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 34, 812–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyer, E. C., Ellis, E. E., McNamara, J. A. and Behrents, R. G. (1986) Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents, The Angle Orthodontist, 56, 7–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halazonetis, D. J., Shapiro, E., Gheewalla, R. K. and Clark, R. E. (1991) Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 99, 49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, G. R. (1961) Mesio-occlusion—a clinical and roentgenographic cephalometric study, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, W. J. B. (1976) Walther's orthodontic notes (3rd edn), John Wright and Sons Ltd, Bristol
   Google Scholar
• Houston, W. J. B. (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 382–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson, A. (1975) The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony, American Journal of Orthodontics, 67, 125–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson, A., Evans, W. G., Preston, C. B. and Sodowsky, P. L. (1974) Mandibular prognathism, American Journal of Orthodontics, 66, 140–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Järvinen, S. (1984) Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 209–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Järvinen, S. (1986) A coordinate-free method for analyzing skeletal malocclusions, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society, 82, 134–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, L. E. (1968) A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction, the Angle Orthodontist, 38, 284–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. J. S. and Adams, C. P. (1988) Cranial base and jaw relationship, American Journal of physical Anthropology, 77, 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. J. S. and Ten Have, T. R. (1988) A comparison of three appliance systems in the treatment of Class III malocclusion, European Journal of Orthodontics, 10, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, C. L. B. (1984) A study of mandibular shape, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 69–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manly, B. F. J. (1986) Multivariate statistical methods, London, New York, Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. A. (1984) A method of cephalometric evaluation, American Journal of Orthodontics, 86, 449–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNamara, J. A., Bookstein, F. L. and Shaughnessy, T. G. (1985) Skeletal and dental changes following function regulator therapy on Class II patients, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 91–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mills, J. R. E. (1966) An assessment of Class III malocclusion, Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, M. L. (1983) Beyond roentgenographic cephalometry—What?, American Journal of orthodontics, 84, 77–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moss, M. L. (1985) The application of the finite element method to the analysis of craniofacial growth and form, Acta Morphalogica Neerlando-Scandinavica, 23, 337–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, M. L., Skalak, R., Patel, H., Sen, K., Moss-Salentijn, L., Shinozuka, M. and Vilmann, H. (1985) Finite element method modelling of craniofacial growth, American Journal of Orthodontics, 87, 453–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyers, R. E. and Bookstein, F. L. (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 599–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyers, R. E., Bookstein, F. L. and Guire, K. E. (1979) The concept of pattern in craniofacial growth, American Journal of Orthodontics, 76, 136–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richtsmeier, J. T. and Cheverud, J. M. (1986) Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth, Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 6, 289–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, R. M. (1957) Planning treatment on the basis of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth, The Angle Orthodontist, 27, 14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, R. M. (1960) Cephalometric synthesis. An exercise in stating objectives and planning treatment with tracings of the head roentgenogram, American Journal of Orthodontics, 46, 647–673.
   Google Scholar
• Sanborn, R. T. (1955) Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion, The Angle Orthodontist, 25, 208–222.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, C. C. (1953) Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics, 30, 729–755.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. W. (1942) On growth and form, 2nd edn, The University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T. and Mark, L. S. (1981) Issues related to the prediction of craniofacial growth, American Journal of Orthodontics, 79, 63–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tweed, C. H. (1953) Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present and future, American Journal of Orthodontics, 39, 81–108.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. and Andersen, C. E. (1986) The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the young child, American Journal of Orthodontics, 89, 302–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar