Facial Growth of Males and Females Compared by Tensor Analysis

References

• Battagel, J. M. (1993) The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis, British Journal of Orthodontics, 20, 283–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971a) The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 111–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S. and Frantz, R. C. (1971b) The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 505–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S. and Korn, E. L. (1981) Patterns of change in mandibular and facial shape associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla, American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 31–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Molthen, R., West, E. E. and Miller, D. M. (1978) Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction, American Journal of Orthodontics, 74, 32–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Molthen, R. and West, E. E. (1981) Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla, American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 17–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Isaacson, R., J., West, E. E. and Molthen, R. (1983) Superimpositional assessment of treatment-associated changes in the temporomandibular joint and the mandibular symphysis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 443–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bishara, S. E., Jamison, J. E., Peterson, L. C. and DeKock, W. H. (1981) Longitudinal changes in standing height and mandibular parameters between the ages of 8 and 17 years, American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 115–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk, A. and Helm, S. (1967) Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height, The Angle Orthodontist, 37, 134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years, European Journal of Orthodontics, 5, 1–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1981) Looking at mandibular growth: some new geometric methods, In: Carlson, D. S. (ed.) Craniofacial biology, Monograph No. 10, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1982) On the cephalometrics of skeletal change, American Journal of Orthodontics, 82, 177–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1983a) The geometry of craniofacial growth invariants, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 221–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1983b) Measuring treatment effects on craniofacial growth, In: McNamara, J. A., Ribbens, K. and Howe, R. P. (eds) Clinical Alteration of the Growing Face, Monograph No. 14, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. (1984) Tensor biometrics for changes in cranial shape, Annals of Human Biology, 11, 413–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (1983) British standard glossary of dental terms, BSI, London, BS 4492.
   Google Scholar
• Burstone, C. J., James, R. B., Legan, H., Murphy, G. A. and Norton, L. A. (1978) Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery, Journal of Oral Surgery, 36, 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, A. M., Moss, J. P., Linney, A. D., Richards, R. and James, D. R. (1991) A mathematical method for the comparison of three-dimensional changes in the facial surface, European Journal of Orthodontics, 13, 95–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creekmore, T. D. and Radney, L. J. (1983) Frnäkel appliance therapy: Orthopedic or orthodontic?, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 89–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlberg, G. (1940) Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students, Allen and Unwin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, W. B. (1948) Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 34, 812–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enlow, D. H., Moyers, R. E., Hunter, W. S. and McNamara, J. A. (1969) A procedure for the analysis of intrinsic facial form and growth. An equivalent-balance concept, American Journal of Orthodontics, 56, 6–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genecov, J. S., Sinclair, P. M. and Dechow, P. C. (1990) Development of the nose and soft tissue profile, The Angle Orthodontist, 60, 191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägg, U., Pancherz, H. and Taranger, J. (1987) Pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment, In: Carlson, D. A. and Ribbens, K. A. (eds), Craniofacial growth during adolescence, Monograph no. 20, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Halazonetis, D. J., Shapiro, E., Gheewalla, R. K. and Clark, R. E. (1991) Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 99, 49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton, M. E. and Grainger, R. M. (1958) Reliability of measurements from cephalograms at the Burlington Orthodontic Research Center, Journal of Dental Research, 37, 853–859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston, W. J. B. (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 382–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston, W. J. B., Mayer, R. E., McElroy, D. and Sherriff, M. (1986) Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs, European Journal of Orthodontics, 8, 149–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, C. J. (1966) The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence, The Angle Orthodontist, 36, 44–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, A. (1975) The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony, American Journal of Orthodontics, 67, 125–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerr, W. J. S. and Ten Have, T. R. (1988) A comparison of three appliance systems in the treatment of Class III malocclusion, European Journal of Orthodontics, 10, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. B., Roche, A. F. and Wagner, B. (1982) Growth of the mandible during pubescence, The Angle Orthodontist, 52, 325–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamandras, A. H. (1988) Linear changes of the maxillary and mandibular lips, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 94, 405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manly, B. F. J. (1986) Multivariate statistical methods, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. A. (1984) A method of cephalometric evaluation, American Journal of Orthodontics, 86, 449–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNamara, J. A., Bookstein, F. L. and Shaughnessy, T. G. (1985). Skeletal and dental changes following function regulator therapy on Class II patients, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 91–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meng, H. P., Goorhuis, J., Kapila, S. and Nanda, R. S. (1988) Growth changes in the nasal profile from 7 to 18 years of age, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 94, 317–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midtgård, J., Björk, G. and Linder-Aronson, S. (1974) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances, The Angle Orthodontist, 44, 56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorrees, C. F. A. and Lebret, L. (1962) The mesh diagram and cephalometrics, The Angle Orthodontist, 32, 214–231.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, J. P., Linney, A. D., Grindrod, S. R., Arridge, S. R. and Clifton, J. S. (1987) Three-dimensional visualization of the face and skull using computerized tomography and laser scanning techniques, European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyers, R. E. and Bookstein, F. L. (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 599–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyers, R. E., Bookstein, F. L. and Guire, K. E. (1979) The concept of pattern in craniofacial growth, American Journal of Orthodontics, 76, 136–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanda, R. S., Meng, H., Kapila, S. and Goorhuis, J. (1990) Growth changes in the soft tissue profile, The Angle Orthodontist, 60, 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancherz, H. and Hansen, K. (1986) Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation, European Journal of Orthodontics, 8, 215–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovich. F. and Thompson, G. W. (1977) Craniofacial templates for orthodontic case analysis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 71, 406–420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remmer, K. R., Mamandras, A. H., Hunter, W. S. and Way, D. C. (1985) Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance and the fixed appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 363–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, R. M. (1968) Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation, American Journal of Orthodontics, 54, 272–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riolo, M. L., Moyers, R. E., McNamara, J. A. and Hunter, W. S. (1974) An atlas of craniofacial growth, Monograph no. 2, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, P. J. (1988) Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements, British Journal of Orthodontics, 15, 105–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair, P. M. and Little, R. M. (1985) Dentofacial maturation of untreated normals, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 146–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiner, C. C. (1953) Cephalometrics for you and me, American Journal of Orthodontics, 39, 729–755.
   Google Scholar
• Subtelny, J. D. (1959) A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures American Journal of Orthodontics, 45, 481–507.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. W. (1942) On Growth and Form, 2nd edn, The University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Vorhies, J. M. and Adams, J. W. (1951) Polygonic interpretation of cephalometric findings, The Angle Orthodontist, 21, 194–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar