Conversation repair and adult cochlear implantation: a qualitative case study

References

• Atkinson JM, Heritage B (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson S (1987) Politeness: some universals of language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caissie R, Rockwell E (1993) A videotape analysis procedure for assessing conversational fluency in hearing-impaired adults. Ear and Hearing 14: 202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie R, Rockwell E (1994) Communication difficulties experienced by nursing home residents with a hearing loss during conversation with staff members. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 18: 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Caissie R, Wilson E (1995) Communication breakdown management during cooperative learning activities by mainstreamed students with hearing losses. Volta Review 97: 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie R, Dawe AL, Donovan C, Brooks H, MacDonald SM (1998) Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 31: 45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chelst TS, Tait CA, Gallagher TM (1990) Linguistic strategies used by normally hearing caregivers in conversations with elderly hearing-impaired spouses. In: Biegel DE, Blum A (eds) Aging and Caregiving: theory, research and policy. Newberry Park: Sage, pp.204–218.
   Google Scholar
• deFilippo CL, Scott BL (1978) A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63: 1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein JL, Lansing CR, Davis JM, Kallaus-Gay A (1994) Communication strategies of adult cochlear implant candidates. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 5: 52–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber NP (1998a) DYALOG: a computer-based measure of conversational performance. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 31: 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Erber NP (1998b) CONAN: A system for analysis of temporal factors in conversation. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 31: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Erber NP (2002) Hearing, Vision, Communication and Older People. Melbourne: Clavis.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A (1994) The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology 8: 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford C, Thompson S (1996) Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In: Ochs E, Schegloff EA, Thompson S (eds) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.134–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné J-P, Wylie KA (1989) Relative effectiveness of three repair strategies on the visual-identification of misperceived words. Ear and Hearing 10: 368–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné J-P, Stelmacovich P, Yovetich W (1991) Reactions to requests for clarification used by hearing-impaired individuals. Volta Review 93: 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetú R, Jones L, Getty L (1993) The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: Implications for rehabilitation. Audiology 32: 363–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchby I, Wooffitt R (1998) Conversation Analysis: principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan H, Bally SJ, Garretson C (1985) Speechreading: a way to improve understanding. Washington DC: Gallaudet University.
   Google Scholar
• Lind C, Hickson L, Erber NP (2004) Conversation repair and acquired hearing impairment: A preliminary quantitative clinical study. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Audiological Society 26: 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Marzolf CA, Stewart M, Nerborthe MA, Lehman ME (1998) Effects of two repair strategies on speechreading of words and sentences. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9: 243–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens E, Raggio M (1987) The USCF tracking procedure for evaluation and training of speech reception by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 52: 120–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens E, Telleen CC (1981) Tracking as an aural rehabilitation process. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 14: 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK, Johnson CE, Roodenburg KEJ (1998) The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26 (1): 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA, Sacks H (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Syntrillium Software Corporation (1998) Cool Edit Pro. Version 1.2. Phoenix AZ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA, Jefferson G, Sacks H (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair for conversation. Language 53: 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray A (1991) Repair strategy usage by hearing-impaired adults and changes following communication therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34: 921–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray A (1992) Preparing for communication interactions: the values of anticipatory strategies for adults with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 430–435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray A (1998) Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: children, adults, and their family members. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Witt S (1996) Conversational moves and conversational styles of adults cochlear-implant users. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 29: 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Purdy SC, Woodworth GO (1992) Reported use of communication strategies by SHHH members: client, talker, and situational variables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 708–717.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Purdy SC, Woodworth GO, Tyler RS (1990) Effects of repair strategies on visual identification of sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 55: 621–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L (1995) Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversation with adult cochlear-implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 459–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L, Sobaski C (1994) Communication breakdowns: partner contingencies and partner reactions. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 27: 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Watson C, Chenery H, Carter MS (1999) An analysis of trouble and repair in the natural conversations of people with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Aphasiology 13: 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Hickson L, Worrall L (1998) Use of communication strategies by adults with hearing impairment. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 3: 29–41.
   Google Scholar