Cross-Sectional Growth Changes in Skeletal and Soft Tissue Cephalometric Landmarks of Children

References

• Sarukawa S, Sugawara Y, Harii K: Cephalometric long-term follow-up of nasal augmentation using iliac bone graft. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32:233–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo LA: Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 1994; 64:31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitoh I, Hayasaki H, Iwase Y, Nakata M. Improvement in jaw motion following treatment of unilateral crossbite in a child with primary dentition: a case report. J Craniomandib Pract 2002; 20:129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Yashiro K, Miyawaki S, Tome W, Yasuda Y, Takada K: Improvement in smoothness of the chewing cycle following treatment of anterior crossbite malocclusion: a case report. J Craniomandib Pract 2004; 22:151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Deguchi T, Umemura Y, Yoshino M, Nakamura H, et al.: Facial soft tissue thickness in skeletal type I Japanese children. Forensic Sci Int 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald JP, Nanda RS, Currier GF: An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102:328–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains MD, Nanda R: Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:481–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozaki T, Ozaki S, Kuroda K: Premolar and additional first molar extraction effects on soft tissue. Effects on high Angle Class II division 1 patients. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:244–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Mir C, Major PW: A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28:586–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasios E, Athanasious MP, Michael Lagoudakis, Panos Goumas: Cephalometric assessment of craniocervical angulation, pharyngeal relationships, soft palate dimensions, hyoid bone and tongue positions Thessaloniki, Greece. Mosby-Year Book 1995:203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima S: Sex-dependent differences in the craniofacial morphology of children with a sleep-related breathing disorder. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94:167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA, Mazaheri M, Lagoudakis M: Cephalometric evaluation of pharynx, soft palate, adenoid tissue, tongue, and hyoid bone following the use of a mandibular repositioning appliance in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1994; 9:273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Yang WS, Nahm DS: Effects of upper lip closing force on craniofacial structures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123:58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoes WA: Articular compass: the location of frontal accessories of bioelastic appliances. J Craniomandib Pract 1999; 17:109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Filho DI, Raveli DB, Raveli RB, de Castro Monteiro Loffredo L, Gandin LG, Jr.: A comparison of nasopharyngeal endoscopy and lateral cephalometric radiography in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal airway obstruction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001; 120:348–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeans WD, Fernando DC, Maw AR: How should adenoidal enlargement be measured? A radiological study based on interobserver agreement. Clin Radiol 1981; 32:337–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Allhaija ES, Al-Khateeb SN: Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:1012–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major MP, Flores-Mir C, Major PW: Assessment of lateral cephalometric diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy and posterior upper airway obstruction: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130:700–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maw AR: Age and adenoid size in relation to adenoidectomy in otitis media with effusion. Am J Otolaryngol 1985; 6:245–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera FC, Travitzki LV, Mattar SE, Matsumoto MA, Elias AM, Anselmo-Lima WT: Muscular, functional and orthodontic changes in pre school children with enlarged adenoids and tonsils. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67:761–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemaloglu YK, Goksu N, Inal E, Akyildiz N: Radiographic evaluation of children with nasopharyngeal obstruction due to the adenoid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108:67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara JA, Jr.: A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86:449–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry: A study on the Cephalometric Standards of Japanese Children. Jpn J Ped Dent 1995; 33:659–696.
   Google Scholar
• Ursi WJ, Trotman CA, McNamara JA, Jr. Behrents RG. Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 1993; 63:47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Jr., Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T: Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110:431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin O, Muelas L, Vinas MJ: Nasopharyngeal cephalometric study of ideal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130:436 e431–439.
   Google Scholar
• Vilella Bde S, Vilella Ode V, Koch HA: Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoidal development in Brazilian subjects. Braz Oral Res 2006; 20:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Subtelny JD, Baker HK: The significance of adenoid tissue in velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg 1956; 17:235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Linder-Aronson S, Leighton BC: A longitudinal study of the development of the posterior nasopharyngeal wall between three and 16 years of age. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5:47–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushimoto K: Study on the growth of the nose. Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1990; 17:100–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J: Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990; 60:177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameda A: Comprehensive dictionary of orthodontics. Tokyo, Japan: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1996:32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shishikura K. The study on measurements of hard and soft tissues by cephalograms–particularly on normal and class I occlusion among Japanese adults. Orthod Waves-Jpn Ed 1969; 28:263–273.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA, Jr.: Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanko AM, Freeman K, Cisneros GJ: Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for Puerto Rican Americans. Angle Orthod 1997; 67:381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Jiang SA, Nakashima A: Cephalometric relationship between facial profile and dentofacial skeletal morphology on Japanese with normal occlusion. Orthod Waves-Jpn Ed 2002; 47:14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nojima K, Nagai H, Nishii Y, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi H: Morphological evaluations in skeletal Class III malocclusion requiring maxillofacial surgery using orthognathic surgical analysis. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2002; 43:163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A: Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on anteroposterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL: Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005; 128:206–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar