Resilient Appliance-Therapy Treatment Outcome In Patients with TMD Pain Correlated to MRIDetermined Changes in Condyle Position

References

• Truelove E, Huggins KH, Mancl L, Dworkin SF: The efficacy of traditional, low-cost and nonsplint therapies for temporomandibular disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:1099–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfors E, Magnusson T, Tegelberg A: Interocclusal appliances—indications and clinical routines in general dental practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 2006; 30:123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark GT: A critical evaluation of orthopedic interocclusal appliance therapy: design, theory, and overall effectiveness. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108:359–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeson JP: Occlusal appliance therapy. In: Okeson JP, ed. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2003; 507–536.
   Google Scholar
• Ramfjord SP, Ash MM: Occlusion. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg EC, Sabet ME, Petersson A, Nilner M: Occlusal appliance therapy in a short-term perspective in patients with temporomandibular disorders correlated to condyle position. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu SA, Suvinen TI, Clement JG, Reade PC: The effect of interocclusal appliances on temporomandibular joints as assessed by 3D reconstruction of MRI scans. Aust Dent J 2001; 46:18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlin DA, Mang H, Colombo V, Palla S, Gallo LM: Stereometric assessment of TMJ space variation by occlusal splints. J Dent Res 2008; 87:877–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BH: Tomographic stability of condyle fossa relationships in 40 treated temporomandibular disorder patients. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:570–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk WS, Jr.: Magnetic resonance imaging and tomographic evaluation of occlusal appliance treatment for advanced internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49:9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnuki T, Fukuda M, Nakata A, Nagai H, Takahashi T, Sasano T, Miyamoto Y: Evaluation of the position, mobility, and morphology of the disc by MRI before and after four different treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh H, Westesson PL, Jisander S, Eriksson L: Disk-repositioning onlays in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disk displacement: comparison with a flat occlusal splint and with no treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 66:155–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westesson PL: Reliability and validity of imaging diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorder. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7:137–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huskisson EC: Visual analogue scales. In: Melzack R, ed. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press, 1983; 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin SF, LeResche L: Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992; 6:301–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr., LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaki MM, Westesson PL, Isberg AM, Ren YF, Tallents RH: Classification and prevalence of temporomandibular joint disk displacement in patients and symptom-free volunteers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109:249–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG: Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill C: Craniomandibular disorders. Guidelines for evaluation, diagnosis and management. Chicago: Quintessence, 1990; 9–12, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg LA: The role of stress, occlusion, and condyle position in TMJ dysfunction- pain. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49:532–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallents RH, Stein SI, Moss ME: The role of occlusion in temporomandibular disorders. In: Fonseca R, ed. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Temporomandibular disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000; 194–219.
   Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, Petersson A: A tomographic study of mandibular condyle position in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53:706–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ: Normal TMJ bony relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res 1981; 60:98–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Aragon H, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Kyrkanides S, Moss ME: Condyle position as a predictor of temporomandibular joint internal derangement. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:205–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG: The significance of condyle position in normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint function. In: Clark GT, Solberg WK, eds. Perspectives in temporomandibular disorders. Chicago: Quintessence, 1987; 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas AL, Moaddab MB, Willis HB, Homayoun NM: A tomographic study of the condyle/fossa relationship in patients with TMJ dysfunction. J Craniomandibular Pract 1984; 2(4):315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquillo HI, Guay J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Murphy W: Tomographic analysis of mandibular condyle position as compared to arthrographic findings of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Disord 1988; 2:59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Limchaichana N, Nilsson H, Ekberg EC, Nilner M, Petersson A: Clinical diagnoses and MRI findings in patients with TMD pain. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34:237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilner M, Petersson A: Clinical and radiological findings related to treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24:128–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg EC, Petersson A, Nilner M: An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27:230–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omnell KA, Petersson A: Radiography of the temporomandibular joint utilizing oblique lateral transcranial projections. Comparison of information obtained with standardized technique and individualized technique. Odontol Revy 1976; 27:77–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark GT, Choi J-K, Browne P: The efficacy of physical medicine treatment, including occlusal appliances, for a population with temporomandibular disorders. In: Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA, eds. Temporomandibular disorders and related pain conditions. Progress in pain research and management. Seattle: IASP Press, 1995; 375–397.
   Google Scholar
• Katzberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Drake CM: Anatomic disorders of the temporomandibular joint disc in asymptomatic subjects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright E, Anderson G, Schulte J: A randomized clinical trial of intraoral soft splints and palliative treatment for masticatory muscle pain. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9:192–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rammelsberg P, LeResche L, Dworkin S, Mancl L: Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: a 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2003; 17:9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar