Application of a Cephalometric Method to the Temporomandibular Joint in Patients With or Without Alteration in the Orientation of the Mandibular Condyle Axis

References

• Learreta JA, Barrientos EE: Temporomandibular joint method to study the morphology and relationship of the hard structures. J Craniomandib Pract 2010; 28(4):223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Learreta JA: Atlas of healthy pathologic images of temporomandibular joint. Artes Médica Latinoamericana 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tecco S, et al.: Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging 2010; 10:28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinberg LA: Correlation of temporomandibular dysfunction with radiographic findings. Prosthet Dent 1972; 28(5):519–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AH III: Orthodontic/orthopedic treatment of craniomandibular pain dysfunction. Part 1:diagnosis with transcranial radiographs. J Craniomandib Pract 1984; 2(3):238–249.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb H: Clinical management of head, neck and TMJ pain and dysfunction. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders, 1977:109.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb H: New concepts in craniomandibular and chronic pain management. Mosby: Wolfe, 1994:274–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts RM: Provocations and perceptions in craniofacial orthopedics. Library of Congress Catalogue, Vol. 1, Book 1, Part 2. 1989:671–672.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail YH, Rokni A: Radiographic study of condylar position in centric relation and centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43(3):327–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas AL, Moaddab MB, Willis HB, Homayoun NM: A tomographic study of the condyle/fossa relationship in patients with TMJ dysfunction. J Craniomandib Pract 1984; 2(4):315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts RM: Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminography. Am J Orthod 1950; 36(12):877–898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts RM: Laminography in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1953; 46(6):620–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Petersson A: Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91(3):200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AH III: Orthodontic/orthopedic treatment of craniomandibular pain dysfunction. Part 2: Posterior condylar displacement. J Craniomandib Pract 1984; 2(4):333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg LA: Superior condylar displacement: its diagnosis and treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34(1):59–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg LA: An evaluation of occlusal factors in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41(2):198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson EH: Laminographic study of mandibular condyle position when recording centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39(5):561–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg LA: Role of condylar position in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41(6):636–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Guichet D: Tomographic analysis of mandibular condyle position in diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55(6):723–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen EL, et al.: Computed tomography of condylar and articular disk positions within the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64(6):757–767.
   Google Scholar
• Gateno J, Anderson PB, Xia JJ, Horng JC, Teichgraeber JF, Liebschner MA: A comparative assessment of mandibular condylar position in patients with anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(1):39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learreta JA: Current diagnosis of temporomandibular pathologies. J Craniomandib Pract 2009; 27(2):125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Enlow DH, Hans MG: Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1996:66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Pullinger A, Hollender L: Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62(6):719–727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF: Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996; 66(1):27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandis N, Karpac J, Trevino R, Williams B: A radiographic study of condyle position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected lateral tomograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100(2):116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzberg RW, Keith DA, Ten Eick WR, Guralnick WC: Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: an assessment of condylar position in centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49(2):250–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ: A method for quantitatively determining temporomandibular joint bony relationships. J Dent Res 1981; 60(1):35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emshoff R, Rudisch A: Temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis: are effusion and bone marrow edema prognostic indicators for arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65(1):66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnuki T, et al.: Evaluation of the position, mobility, and morphology of the disc by MRI before and after four different treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35(2):103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sembronio S, Albiero AM, Toro C, Robiony M, Politi MI: Is there a role for arthrocentesis in recapturing the displaced disc in patients with closed lock of the temporomandibular joint? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(3):274–280; discussion 281. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
   Google Scholar
• Güler N, Uçkan S, Imirzalioglu P, Açikgözoglu S: Temporomandibular joint internal derangement: relationship between joint pain and MR grading of effusion and total protein concentration in the joint fluid. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34(3):175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güler N, Yatmaz PI, Ataoglu H, Emlik D, Uckan S: Temporomandibular internal derangement: correlation of MRI findings with clinical symptoms of pain and joint sounds in patients with bruxing behaviour. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32(5):304–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogütcen-Toller M, Taskaya-Yilmaz N, Yilmaz F: The evaluation of temporomandibular joint disc position in TMJ disorders using MRI. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31(6):603–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitral RW, Telles Cde S, Fraga MR, de Oliveira RS, Tanaka OM: Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with Class II division 1, subdivision malocclusions: condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126(1):48–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisiane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Bieza A, Zepa K, Rogovska I: Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II, division 1 subdivision malocclusion. Stomatologija 2007; 9(3):67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S , etal.: Application of rapid prototyping for temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 69(2):432–438. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
   Google Scholar
• Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K: Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients. Stomatiologija 2009; 11(1):32–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farronato G, Garagiola U, Carletti V, Cressoni P, Mercatali L, Farronato D: Change in condylar and mandibular morphology in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Cone Bean volumetric imaging. Minerva Stomatol 2010; 59(10):519–534.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira Ade F, Henriques JC, Almeida GA, Machado AR, Machado NA, Fernandes Neto AJ: Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (Cone-Beam). J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17 Suppl:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ: Normal TMJ bony relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res 1981; 60(2):98–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, Petersson A: A tomographic study of mandibular condyle position in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53(5):706–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar WB: Characteristics of the condylar path in internal derangements of the TMJ. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39(3):319–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongini F: The importance of radiography in the diagnosis of TMJ dysfunctions. A comparative evaluation of transcranial radiographs and serial tomography. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45(2):186–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren YF, Isberg A, Westesson PL: Condyle position in the temporomandibular joint. Comparison between asymptomatic volunteers with normal disk position and patients with disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80(1):101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquillo HI, Guay J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Murphy W: Tomographic analysis of mandibular condyle position as compared to arthrographic findings of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Disord 1988; 2(2):59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brand JW, Whinery JG Jr, Anderson QN, Keenan KM: The effects of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and degenerative joint disease on tomographic and arthrotomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67(2):220–223.
   Google Scholar