Current Concepts in Diagnostic Histopathology: Immunohistologic Methods and Their Application in Diagnostic Histopathology

References

• Shikata T, Uzawa T, Yoshwara N, et al: Staining methods of Australia antigen in paraffin sections. Jpn J Exp Med 44:1, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creutzfeldt W, Arnold R, Creutzfeldt C, et al: Biochemical and morphological investigation of 30 human insulinomas. Correla-tion between the tumor content of insulin and pro-insulin-like components and the histological and the histological and ultra-structural appearance. Diabetologia 9:217, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon H and Prento P: Aldehyde fuchsin staining of pancreatic B cells. Reproducible high-contrast staining of formalin-fixed paraf-fin-embedded material. Histochem J 12:97, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jobsis AC, DeVries GP, Anholt RRH, and Sanders GTB: Demon-stration of the prostatic origin of metastases. An immunohisto-chemical method for formalin-fixed embedded tissue. Cancer 41:1788, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichner ER: The plasma cell dyscrasias. Diverse presentations, pathophysiology and management. Postgrad Med 67:44, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujihara S, Balow JE, Costa JC, and Glenner CC: Identification and classification of amyloid in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embed-ded tissue sections by the unlabelled immunoperoxidase method. Lab Invest 43:358, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rysiuyh MH and von Heusden J: A reliable method for dif-ferentiating amyloid AA from other forms of amyloid in routine laboratory practice. Am J Pathol 97:143, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Mukai K and Rosai J: Applications of immunoperoxidase tech-niques in surgical pathology, in Progress in Surgical Pathology, C. M. Fenoglio and M. Wolff (Eds.), Vol. 1, 1980, pp. 15–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tejada-Mesa R, Pascal RR, and Fenoflio CM: Immunoperoxi-dase: A sensitive immunohistochemical technique as a "special stain" in the diagnostic pathology laboratory. Human Pathol 8:313, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyderman E: Immunoperoxidase techniques in histopathology: Applications, methods and controls. I Clin Pathol 32:971, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn RC: Fluorescent Protein Tracing. E & S Livingstone Ltd., Edinburgh and London, 1969, p. 146.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberger LA: Immunocytochernistry, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty GC, Moriarty CM, and Sternberger LA: Ultrastructural immunocytochemistry with unlabeled antibodies and the peroxi-dase-antiperoxidase complex. A technique more sensitive than radioimmunoassay. I Histochem Cytochem 21:825, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuaImam SJ and Keren DF: Immunofluorescence of deparaffin-ized trypsin-treated renal tissues. Preservation of antigens as an adjunct to diagnosis of disease. Lab Invest 41:483,1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading M: A digestion technique for the reduction of back-ground staining in the immunoperoxidase method. I Clin Pathol 30:88, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns J: Background staining and sensitivity of the unlabeled antibody-enzyme (PAP) method. Comparison with the peroxi-dase-labeled antibody sandwich method using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material. Histochemistry 43:291, 1975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns J: Immunohistological methods and their application in the routine laboratory, In Recent Advances in Histo pathology, Chapt. 16, P.P. Anthony and N. Woolf (Eds.). Churchill Living-stone, New York, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Elias JM and Miller F: A comparison of the unlabeled enzyme method with immunofluorescence for the evaluation of human immunologic renal disease. Am I Clin Pathol 66:464, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Petrusz P, Ordronneau P, and Finley JCW: Criteria of reliability for light microscopic immunocytochemical staining. Histochem 12:333, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zehr D: Use of hydrogen peroxide-egg albumin to eliminate nonspecific staining in immunoperoxidase techniques. I Histo-chem Cytochem 26:415, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrusz P, Dimeo P, Ordronneau P, et al: Improved immunoglobulin-enzyme bridge method for light microscopic demonstration of hormone-containing cells of the rat adenohypo-physis. Histochemistry 46:9, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• DeLellis RA, Sternberger, LA, Mann RB, et al: Immunoperox-idase technics in diagnostic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 71:483, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias JM, Chandor S, and Miller F: Fixative effects on tissue an-tigenicity (Abs.), Proceedings of the Histochemical Society, 31st Annual Meeting, New Orleans. J Histochem Cytochem 8:600, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Smit JW, Meijer CJLM, Decary F, and Feltkamp-Vroom: Parafor-maldehyde fixation in immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. J Immunol Methods 6:93, 1974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haung S-N, Minassian H, and More JD: Application of im-munofluorescent staining on paraffin sections improved by tryp-sin digestion. Lab Invest 35:383, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks PM: Diagnostic application of an immunoperoxidase method in haematopathology. I Histochem Cytochem
   Google Scholar
• Personal observations.
   Google Scholar