Alteration of Acrylic Bone Cement by Chemicals Used during Hard Tissue Specimen Processing

References

• Roberts DW, Poss R, Kelley K: Radiographic comparison of cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1(4):241–247, 1986
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBeath AA, Foltz RN: Femoral component loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 141:66–70, 1979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE et al: Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty: Significance of radio-lucent lines. Clin Orthop 216:151–158, 1987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russotti GM, Coventry MB, Stauffer RN: Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques: A five-year mini-mum follow-up study. Clin Orthop 235:141–147, 1988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris WH, Davies JP: Modern use of modern cement for total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 19(3):581–589, 1988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JP, Harris WH: Comparison of diametral shrinkage of centrifuged and uncentrifuged Simplex P bone cement. J Appl Biomater 6:209–211, 1995
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulroy RD, Harris WH: The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement: An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 72-B(5): 757–760, 1990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young pa-tients with hip arthroplasty: A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B(3)385–389, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kindt-Larsen T, Smith DB, Jensen JS: Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment. J Appl Biomater 6: 75–83, 1995
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Robinson HJ: Mechanical failures in total hip replacement requiring reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A(1)28–36, 1979
   Google Scholar
• Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR et al: Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed ce-mented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 72-A(8): 1220–1229, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR et al: The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B(4)551–558, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Maloney WJ, Jasty M et al: Autopsy studies of the bone-cement interface in well-fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 8(2):179–187, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW et al: Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties: A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clin Orthop 249:129–139, 1989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emmanual J, Hornbeck C, Bloebaum RD: A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol 62(6):401–410, 1987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterchi DL, Eurell JAC: An evaluation of methylmethacrylate mixtures for hard tissue embedding. J Histotechnol 18(1):45–49, 1995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk RK, Olah AJ, Hellmann W: Preparation of calcified tissues for light microscopy. In Methods of Calcified Tissue Preparation. Dickson GR (ed). Elsevier Science Publishers, Oxford, UK, 1984, pp 1–56
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson C, McGee M, Bloebaum RD: Polypropylene con-tainers for safe and predictable embedding of specimens in PMMA. J Histotechnol 13:131–133, 1990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath K, Breuner G: A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached Soft tissues: The Sage-Schiff sawing and grinding technique. J Oral Pathol 11:318–326, 1982
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillmann G, Hillman B, Donath K: Enzyme, lectin and im-munohistochemistry of plastic embedded undecalcified bone and other hard tissues for light microscopic investigations. Biotech Histochem: 185–193, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath K: Preparation of Histologic Sections. Exakt-Kulzer Publication, Norderstedt, Germany, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Fornasier VL, San,ders G, Goodman SB: Histological tech-niques for the stidy of biomaterial-tissue interface of total joint replacements: A modification for the preservation of bone cement. J Appl Biomater 3:59–62, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Jensen LN, Jensen JS, Gotfredsen K: A method for histologi-cal preparation of undecalcified bone sections containing acrylic bone cement. Biotech Histochem: 82–86, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart CL, Skinner RA, Hollis JM: Plexiglas-modified Spurr low viscosity embedding medium composite mold system for study of the effect of micromotion on bone ingrowth. J His-totechnol 16(2):145–149, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Krizan ME, Schneider RL, Ettinger RL et al: Preparation and methods for sequential evaluation of titanium implant inter-faces in plastic embedded calcified bone. J Histotechnol 17(4):333–340, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson C, Kitabayashi L: Parallel experience of two dif-ferent laboratories with the initiator perkadox 16 for polymer-ization of methylmethacrylates. J Histotechnol 17(4):343–347, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner R, Nicholas R, Stewart C et al: Resected allograft bone containing an implanted expanded polytetrafluoroethyl-ene prosthetic ligament:. Comparison of paraffin, glycolmeth-acrylate, and Exakt grinding techniques. J Histotechnol 16(2): 129, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurr AR: A loW-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26:31–43, 1969
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloebaum RD, Gruen TA, Robertson GS et al: Dimensional -studies of orthopedic bone cement in Spun and acrylic em-bedding media. J Histotechnol 13(1):55–59, 1990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmanual J, Emmanual JG, Koeneman JB: Alteration of re-trieve implants in vitro by processing and infiltrating fluids. J Biomed Mater Res 23:337–347, 1989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieswetter K, Bauer TW, Brown SA et al: Alteration of hy-droxylapatite coatings exposed to chemicals used in histologi-cal fixation. J Biomed Mater Res 28:281–287, 1994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Matos M et al: The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop 117:221–240, 1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M: Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 56-A(7)1368–1382, 1974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charosky CB, Bullough P, Wilson PD: Total hip replacement failures: A histological evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 55-A(1): 49–58, 1973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman MK, Banks SA, Hodge WA: Bone cement porosity and volume are affected by chemicals used during specimen processing. Transact 5th World Biomater Congr, 1996, p 39
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: Standard specification for acrylic bone cement. In 1992 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM (ed). ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992, pp 112–118
   Google Scholar
• Haas SS, Brauer GM, Dickson G: A characterization of poly-methylmethacrylate bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg 3:380–391, 1975
   Google Scholar
• Lavemia CJ, Guzman JF, Cook SD et al: Biological versus cemented fixation in clinically successful tibial trays: A histological analysis. Transact 20th Annu Meet Soc Biomater, 1994, p 87
   Google Scholar
• Ritter MA, Gioe TJ, Stringer EA: Radiolucency surrounding the posterior cruciate condylar total knee prosthetic compo-nents. Clin Orthop 160:149–152, 1981
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed AM, Raab S, Miller JE: Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation. J Orthop Res 2:105–118, 1984
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bostwick DG, Annouf NA, Choi C: Establishment of the for-malin-free surgical pathology laboratory:utility of an alcohol-based fixative. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118:298–302, 1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald G, Dillman P, Shirley I: Evaluation of six histo-logical fixatives using image analysis to measure reaction product concentration. J Histotechnol 18(2): 119–125, 1995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones ML: Fixation (or how it’s supposed to be done). Na-tional Society for Histotechnology Workshop 68, 20th Annual Symposium, 1994
   Google Scholar