Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses — a cladistic overview

REFERENCES

• Akiyama H.1986.Notes on little known species of the genus Leucodon with immersed or laterally exserted capsules. Acta Phytotaxonorrzica et Geobotanica 37: 128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama H.1987.Morphology and anatotny of the peristome in Dozya japonica (Musci) and reconsideration on its affinity to the Leucodontace4e. Bryolo gist 90: 409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama H.1988a.Studies on Leucodon (Leiicodontaceae, Musci) and related genera in east Asia. Ill. Note on the systematic position of PterOgonium Sw. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 39: 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama H.1988b.Studies on Leucodon (Leucodontaceae, Musci) and related genera in east Asia. IV. Taxonomic reviiion of Leucodon in east Asia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 65: 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama H.1990a. A-morphological study of branch development in mosses with special reference to pseudopazaiShyllia. Botanical Magazine 103: 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama H.1990b.Morphology and taxonomic significance of dormant branch prinaordia, dormant buds, and vegetative reproductive organs in the suborders Leucodontineae and Neckerineae (Musci, Isobryales). Bryologist 93: 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama H,Nishimura N.1993.Further studies of branch buds in mosses; `Pseudoparaphyllia' and ‘Scaly leaves’. Journal of Plant Research 106: 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen BH.1987.A revision of the genus Leucomium (Leucomiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 661–677.
   Google Scholar
• Allen BH,Magill RE, Crosby MR. 1985. Observations on the peristorne and systematic position of Tetrastichium fontanum (Musci). Journal of Bryology 13: 515-522.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews AL.1952.Taxonomic Notes XI. The case of Tripterocladium brewerianum. Bryologist 55: 166-172. AndrewsAL.1954.Taxonomic notes. XII. The families Rhytidiaceae and Hylocomiaceae. Bryologist 57: 251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherus VF. 1924. Musci (Laubmoose). J. Hälfte. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherus VF. 1925. Musci (Laubmoose). 2. Hälfte. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natiirlicherz Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1979.A revision of the moss genus Trachyphyllum Gepp (Thuidiaceae). Brittonia 31: 379–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1980a.A generic revision of the Entodontaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 48: 71–159.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1980b.Animadversions on Pterigynandrum with special commentary on Forsstroemia and Leptopterigynandrum. Bryologist 83: 451-465. 774
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1987.Taxonomic and nomenclatural rearrangement in the Hookeriales with notes on West Indian taxa. Brittonia 39: 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1988.Another view of familial delimitation in the Hookeriales. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64: 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR.1994.A new attempt at understanding the Meteoriaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 75: 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR,Crum H.1978.A re-interpretation of the Fabroniaceae with notes on selected genera. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 44: 347–369.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR,Crum H. 1990. An evaluation of familial limits among the genera traditionally aligned with the Thuidiaceae and Leskeaceae. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 17: 55-69. BuckWR,IrelandRR.1985.A reclassification of the Plagiotheciaceae. Nova Hedwigia 41: 89-125. BuckWR,IrelandRR.1989. Plagiotheciaceae. Flora Neotropica. Monograph no. 50. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR,Vitt DH.1986.Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon 35: 21–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catcheside DG.1980. Mosses of South Australia. South Australia: D. J. Woolman.
   Google Scholar
• Christy JA.1987. Limbella fryei (Williams) Ochyra distinct from L. tricostata (Sun.) C. M. (Musci: Amblystegiaceae). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 63: 395–410.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill SP.1986.A revision of Echinodium Jur. (Echinodiaceae: Hypnobryales). Journal of Bryology 14: 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill SP.1989.Transfer of Lepidopilum virens Cardot to Tetrastichium (Leucomiaceae). Journal of Bryology 15: 537–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby MR.1974.Toward a revised classification of the Hookeriaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 38: 129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H.1987. Bestia, Tripterocladium, and Isothecium: an explication of relationships. Bryologist 90: 40-42. CrumH.1991.A partial clarification of the Lembophyllaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 69: 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• During HJ.1977.A taxonomical revision of the Garovaglioideae (Pterobryaceae, Musci). Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 12: 1–244.
   Google Scholar
• Enroth J.1993.Notes on the Neckeraceae (Musci). 18. Description of Curvicladium, a new genus from southern and southeastern Asia. Annales Botanici Fennici 30: 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS. 1988. HENNIG86. Version 1.5. (Place of issue not stated).
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer M. 1900- 1922. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 1-4. Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL,Humphries CJ,Kitching IJ, Scotland RW, Siebert DJ, Williams DM. 1992. Cladistics: X practical course in systematics. Systematics Association Publications, No. 10. London: Clarendon Press. FritschR.1991.Indexto bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 40: 1-352.
   Google Scholar
• Gangulee HC. 1976. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions. Fasc. 6 (Hookeriales). Calcutta. Gangulee HC. 1978. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions. Fasc. 7 (Hypnobryales-Leskeineae). Calcutta,
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L.1987a.On the ontogeny of alar cells in Drepanocladus aduncus, D. exannulatus and some other species. Journal of Bryology 14: 753–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 198713. North European mosses with axillary rhizoids, a taxonomic study. Journal of Bryology 14: 429-439.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L.1987c.On the taxonomic position of Tomentypnurn Loeske. Journal of Bryology 14: 729-736. HedendsL.1989a.Some neglected character distribution patterns among the pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist 92: 157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L.1989b.Axillary hairs in pleurocarpous mosses - a comparative study. Lindbergia 15: 166-180. HedenfisL.1989c.The genera Scorpidium and Hamatocaulis, gen. nov., in northern Europe. Lindbergia 15: 8–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L.1990a.Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Calliergonella and Breidleria. Lindbergia 16: 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L.1990b.The genus Pseudocalliergon in northern Europe. Lindbergia 16: 80–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 1992. Flora of Madeiran pleurocarpous mosses (Isobryales, Hypnobryales, Hookeriales), Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 44: 1–165.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 1994a.The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses - a cladistic approach. Bryologist 97: 225–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenä L. 1994b. What is a Hypnoid peristome? Bryological Times 78:3.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland RR. 1968. Pleuroziopsidaceae, a new family of mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 31: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland RR. 1969. A taxonomic revision of the genus Plagiothecium for North America north of Mexico. Publications in Botany No. 1. Ottawa: Natural Museums of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• IwatsukiZ.1979.Re-examination of Myurium and its related genera from Japan and its adjacent areas. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 46: 257–283.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda H.1975.A revision of the family Amblystegiaceae of Japan I. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Series B, Div. 2,15: 201–276.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda H.1976.A revision of the family Amblystegiaceae of Japan II. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Series B, Div. 2,16: 47–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton E.1957.A revision of the genus Lescuraea in Europe and North America. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 84: 281-307,337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Lin S-H.1983.A taxonomic revision of Phyllogoniaceae (Bryopsida). Part I. Journal of the Taiwan Museum 36: 37–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lin S-H.1984.A taxonomic revision of Phyllogoniaceae (Bryopsida). Part IL Journal of the Taiwan Museum 37: 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel MG.1974.A revised classification of the Leucodontaceae and a revision of the subfamily Alsioideae. Bryologist 77: 531–550.
   Google Scholar
• Maschke J.1976.Taxonomische Revision der Laubmoosgattung Myurium (Pterobryaceae). Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 6: 1–218.
   Google Scholar
• Matteri CM.1973.Revision de las Hypopterygiaceae (Musci) austrosudamericanas. Boletin de la Sociedad Argentina de Botcinica 15: 229–250.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel M.1992.The bryophytes of Sabah (North Borneo) with special reference to the BRYOTROP transect of Mount Kinabalu. XVII. Meteoriaceae (Leucodontales, Bryopsida). Wildenowia 22: 171-196. MillerHA.1971.An overview of the Hookeriales. Phytologia 21: 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler BD.1986.A Hennigian approach to bryophyte phylogeny. Journal of Bryology 14: 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura N.1985.A revision of the genus Ctenidium (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 58: 1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura N, Higuchi M, Seki T, Ando H. 1984. Delimitation and subdivision of the moss family Hypnaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 55: 227-234.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura N, Matsui S. 1990a. SEM observations of moss pseudoparaphyllia, J. Isobryales. Hikobia 10: 429-434.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura N, Matsui S. 1990b. SEM observations of moss pseudoparaphyllia, 2. Hyponobryales. Bulletin of the Hiruzen Research Institute, Okayama University of Science 16: 117-138. [Note: Ilyponobryalesl. NoguchiA.1974. A check list of the mosses of Japan. Kumamoto.
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi A.1976.A taxonomic revision of the family Meteoriaceae of Asia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 41: 231–357.
   Google Scholar
• Norris DH, Enroth J. 1990. Description of Bryolawtonia Norris & Enroth (Thamnobryaceae), with observations on the genus Bestia. Bryologist 93: 328-331.
   Google Scholar
• Norris DH, Koponen T. 1985. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. VII. Trachypodaceae, Thuidiaceae and Meteoriaceae (Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 131: 1-51.
   Google Scholar
• Norris DH, Robinson II. 1979. The systematic position of Bryobrothera crenulata. Bryologist 82: 305-309.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm E. 1960. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II.Musci. Fasc. 4. Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm E. 1965. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II, Musci. Faso. 5. Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1985. Hypnobartlettia fontana gen. et sp. nov. (Musci: Hypnobartlettiaceae fam. nov.), a unique moss from New Zealand. Lindbergia 11: 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1986. Sciaromiadelphus A. Abr. & I. Abr. - The relationship between extant and fossil moss specimens. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 61: 309–332.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1987a.A revision of the moss genus Sciaromium (Mitt.) Mitt. II. The section Limbidium Dusén, with a description of Vittia gen. nov. (Vittiaceae fain. nov.). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 62: 387–415.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1987b.A revision of the moss genus Sciaromium (Mitt.) Mitt. III. The section Platyloma Broth. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 63: 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1987c.On the taxonomy and family placement of the moss genus Limbella (C. Muell.) Broth. Journal of Bryology 14: 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1989.Animadversions on the moss genus Cratoneuron (Still.) Spruce. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 67: 203–242.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1991.Validation of Rhizofabronia persoonii var. sphaerocarpa (Musci, Fabroniaceae). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 36: 279–280.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R.1993.Taxonomic results of the BRYOTROP expedition to Zaire and Rwanda. 20. Grimmiaceae, Funariaceae, Bartramiaceae (Philonotis), Amblystegiaceae, Plagiotheciaceae. Tropical Bryology 8: 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R, Koponen T, Norris DH. 1991. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. XLVI. Amblystegiaceae (Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 143: 91-106.
   Google Scholar
• Richards PW,Argent GCG.1968.Notes on African mosses. IV. New and interesting species mostly from Nigeria and the Cameroons. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 5: 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson H.1962.Generic revisions of North American Brachytheciaceae. Bryologist 65: 73-146. RobinsonH.1971.A revised classification for the orders and families of mosses. Phytologia 21: :289-293. RobinsonH.1975.The mosses of the Juan Fernandez Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 27: 1-88. RobinsonH.1986.On the relationships of the Hookeriaceae. Bryological Times 35: 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer JR.1985a.A phenetic and phylogenetic analysis of the Hylocomiaceae and Rhytidiaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 59: 185–240.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer JR.1985b.A generic revision of the Hylocomiaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratorit 59: 241–278.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury GOK.1955.A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin 5: 1–490.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield VVB.1985. Heterocladium macounii in North America. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 11: 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Seki T. 1968. A revision of the family Sematophyllaceae of Japan with special reference to a statistical demarcation of the family. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Series B, Div. 2,12: 1-80. SmithAJE.1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streimann H.1991.Taxonomic studies on Australian Meteoriaceae (Musci). 2: The genera Aerobryopsis, Barbella, Floribundaria, Meteoriopsis, Meteorium and Weymouthia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 69: 277–312.
   Google Scholar
• Takaki N.1955.Researches on the Brachytheciaceae of Japan and its adjacent areas (I). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 14: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomikoski R,Koponen T.1979.On the generic taxonomy of Calliergon and Drepanocladus (Musci, Amblystegiaceae). Annales Botanici Fennici 16: 213–227.
   Google Scholar
• Vitt DH. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida. In: Schuster RM, ed. New manual of bryology, Vol. 2. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 696-759.
   Google Scholar
• Walther K. 1983. Bryophytina. La.ubmoose. In: Gerloff J, Poelt J, eds. A. Engler 's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 13. Berlin & Stuttgart: Gebriider Borntraeger.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe R.1972.A revision of the family Thuidiaceae in Japan and adjacent areas. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 36: 171–320.
   Google Scholar
• Welch WH.1976.Hookeriaceae. North American Flora, Ser. II.9: 1–120.
   Google Scholar
• Zanten BO van. 1959.Trachypodaceae, a critical revision. Blumea 9:477–575.
   Google Scholar
• Zomlefer WB.1993.A revision of Rigodium (Musci: Rigodiaceae). Bryologist 96: 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar