Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Bryology Volume 22, 2000 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
50
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A cladistic overview of the Bryaceae (Musci) based on morphological and anatomical data and with emphasis on the genus Bryum

Niklas Pedersen
Pages 193-206 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Andrews AL. 1935. Bryaceae, pp. 184-242. In Grout AJ, ed. Moss flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 2. Newfane.
  • Bizot M. 1969. Mousses des iles du Cap Vert. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 63: 441–454.
  • Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstructions. Evolution 42: 795–803.
  • Brotherns VF. 1925. Musci (Laubmoose). 2. Hälfte. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die nat iirlichen Pflanzenfarnilien. Leipzig.
  • Chopra RS. 1975. Taxonomy of Indian mosses. Botanical Monograph 10: i-xL, 1–631.
  • Cox CJ, Hedderson TAJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119–139.
  • Crum H. 1967. Studies in North American BryaceaeBryologist 70: 170–110.
  • Eriksson T. 1998. AutoDecay. Version 4.0.1. (Hypercardstack distribu-ted by the author). Stockholm: Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholm University.
  • Fleischer M. 1900-1922. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 1-4. Leiden.
  • Fritsch R. 1991. Index to bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophy-torum Bibliotheca 40: 1–352.
  • Gangulee HC. 1974. Mosses of eastern India and adjacent regions. Fasc. 4. Calcutta.
  • Hedenäs L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses – a cladistic approach. Bryologist 97: 225–243.
  • Hedenäs L. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplole-pidous pleurocarpous mosses – a cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology 18: 723–781.
  • Hedenäs L. 1996a. A cladistic evaluation of relationships between the Hookeriales, the Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindber-gia 21: 49–82.
  • Hedenäs L. 1996b. A cladistic overview of the “Hookeriales”. Lindber-gia 21: 107–143.
  • Hedenäs L. 1998. Cladistic studies on pleurocarpous mosses: Research needs and use of results. In: Bates JW, Ashton NW, Duckett JG. eds. Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds: W. S. Maney & Son and British Bryological Society, 125–141.
  • Hedenäs L. 1997. An evaluation of phylogenetic relationships among the Thuidiaceae, the Amblystegiaceae, and the temperate members of the Hypnaceae. Lindbergia 22: 101–133.
  • Ignatov MS, Tan BT. 1992. Orthodontopsis, a new genus of Bryaceae (Musci) from southern Siberia, USSR. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 71: 165–173.
  • Koponen T. 1988. The phylogeny and classification of Mniaceae and Rhizogoniaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Labora-tory 64: 37–46
  • Müller C. 1849. Synopsis Muscorum Frondosorum, Pars Prima. Berolini.
  • Nyholm E. 1993. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 3. Copenha-gen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
  • Ochi H. 1959. A revision of the Bryaceae in Japan and the adjacent regions. Tottori: Biological Institute, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tottori University.
  • Rooy J van, Magill RE. 1987. Bryaceae. In: Magill RE, ed. Flora of Southern Africa, Part 1, Fascicle 2. Pretoria: Botanical Research Institute, 335–393.
  • Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781–1795.
  • Sharp AJ, Crum H, Eckel PM. 1994. The moss flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical garden 69 (2): i–vii, 581-1113, I-XVII.
  • Shaw J. 1985. The correlation between taxonomy and peristome structure in the Bryaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 59: 79–100.
  • Shaw J, Fife AJ. 1984. The evolutionary and taxonomic signifi-cance of peristome morphology in Anomobryum (Bryaceae, Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 57: 285–298.
  • Siddall ME, Kluge AG. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13: 313–336.
  • Smith AJE. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spence JR. 1987. A proposed reclassification of Bryum, Anomobryum and Brachymenium (Musci, Bryaceae). Journal of Bryology 14: 659–676.
  • Swofford DL. 1993. PA UP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
  • Vitt DH. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida. In: Schuster RM. ed. New manual of bryology, Vol. 2. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 696–759.
  • Walther K. 1983. Bryophytina,. Laubmosse. In: Gerloff J, Poeit J, eds. A Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 13. Berlin & Stuttgart: Gebriider Borntraeger.
  • Zander R. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Science 32: i-vi, 1–378.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.