References
- Hurwitz EL, Kominski GF, Yu F, Chiang LM. A randomized trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients with low back pain: Eighteen-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine 2006;31:611–621.
- Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 2nd ed. Phys Ther 2001;81:9–744.
- Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002;27:2835–2843.
- Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:920–928.
- Fritz JM, Childs JD, Flynn TW. Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention. BMC Family Practice 2005;6:29.
- Tseng YL, Wang WTJ, Chen WY, Hou TJ, Chen TC, Lieu FK. Predictors for the immediate responders to cervical manipulation in patients with neck pain. Man Ther 2006;11:306–315.
- Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL. Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: Use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education. Phys Ther 2007;87:9–23.
References
- 15 U.S.C. §45
- 15 U.S.C. §1–2
- U.S. Constitution amendement I.
- Enforcement Perspectives on the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine. FTC Report, 2006. Available at: www.ftc.gov/
- E. R.R. Presidents’ Conference v. Noerr Pennington Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 1961.
- Improving Health Care: A Dose of Competition. Rpt. Fed. Trade Commission and the Dept. of Justice, July 2004.