References
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard. Document M27-A. 2nd ed. Wayne: NCCLS, 2002.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts: proposed guideline M44-A. Wayne: NCCLS, 2004.
- Barry AL, Pfaller MA, Rennie RP, Fuchs PC, Brown SD. Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46 (6): 1781–1784.
- Lee SC, Fung CP, Lee N, et al. Fluconazole disk diffu-sion test with methylene blue- and glucose-enriched Mueller-Hinton agar for determining susceptibility of Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39 (4): 1615–1617.
- Matar MJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Paetznick VL, Rodriguez JR, Chen E, Rex JH. Correlation between E-test, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal sus-ceptibility testing of fluconazole and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47 (5): 1647–1651.
- Morace G, Amato G, Bistoni F, et al. Multicenter com-parative evaluation of six commercial systems and the national committee for clinical laboratory standards M27-A broth microdilution method for fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40 (8): 2953–2958.
- Nelson SM, Cartwright CP. Detection of fluconazole-resistant isolates of Candida glabrata by using an agar screen assay. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41 (5): 2141–2143.
- Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ. Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by broth microdilution, disk diffusion and Etest methods: Report from the ARTEMIS Global anifungal susceptibility program. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 41 (4): 1440–1446.
- Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Boyken L, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ. Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffu-sion methods for determining susceptibilities of 235 blood-stream isolates of Candida glabrata to fluconazole and voriconazole. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41 (5): 1875–1880.
- Posteraro B, Romano L, Sanguinetti M, Masucci L, Morace G, Fadda G. Commercial systems for fluconazole sus-ceptibility testing of yeasts: comparison with the broth microdilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 38 (1): 29–36
- Kuriyama T, Williams DW, Bagg J, Coulter WA, Ready D, Lewis MA. In vitro susceptibility of oral Candida to seven antifungal agents. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20 (6): 349–353.
- Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Rex JH, et al. Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against voriconazole: analysis and proposal for interpretive break-points. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 (3): 819–826.
- Arthington-Skaggs BA, Lee-Yang W, Ciblak MA, et al. Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of broth microdilution MIC end point determination and evalua-tion of a sterol quantitation method for in vitro susceptibility testing of fluconazole and itraconazole against trailing and nontrailing Candida isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46 (8): 2477–2481.
- Newcombe RG. Two sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998, 17 (8): 857–872.
- Newcombe RG. Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Stat Med 1998, 17 (22): 2635–2650.
- Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of 11 meth-ods. Stat Med 1998, 17 (8): 873–890.
- Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. eds. Measurement error: assessment and implications. Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003.