Paraquat Exposure of Knapsack Spray Operators on Banana Plantations in Costa Rica

References

• Wesseling C, Castillo L, Elinder CG. Pesticide poisonings in Costa Rica. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993; 19: 227–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union Mundial para la Naturaleza, Oficina Regional para Centroamérica, Oficina Nacional de Costa Rica. Evaluación del Impact° Socio Ambiental de la Expansion Bananera en Sarapiqui, Torteguero y Talamanca, informe al Ministerio de Recursos Naturales, Energia y Minas (MIRENEM), 1992.
   Google Scholar
• CORBANA. Costa Rica, Estadisticas de Exportacion Bananera 1994.1995;ISSN 1409-0058.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes WJ, Lawes ER. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Haley TJ. Review of the toxicology of paraquat. Clin Toxicol. 1979; 14: 1–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinbaurn Z, Samuels SJ, Schenker B. Risk factors for occupational illnesses associated with the use of paraquat in California. Arch Environ Health. 1996; 50: 341–8.
   Google Scholar
• Senanayake N, Gurunathan G, Hart TB, et al. An epidemiological study of the health of Sri Lankan tea planatation workers associated with long term exposure to paraquat. Br J Ind Med. 1993; 50: 257–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard JK, Sabapathy NN, Whitehead PA. A study of the health of Malaysian plantation workers with particular reference to paraquat spraymen. Br J Ind Med. 1981; 38: 110–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin PJ, Klaff LJ, Rose AG, Ferguson AD. Pulmonary effects of contact exposure to paraquat: a clinical and experimental study. Thorax. 1979; 34: 150–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak A, Taitelman U, Hoffer E. Percutaneous permeability to paraquat: in vitro experiments with human skin. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol. 1990; 9: 301–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Food and Agriculture. Human health problems associated with the herbicide paraquat in California 1965-1976. Sacramento, California: CDFA, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan CM. Accidental poisoning by paraquat a report of two cases in man. Br Med J. 1966;i:1272–3.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando R, Harendra de Silva DG, Arnarasena TSD, An unusual case of fatal accidental paraquat poisoning. For Science Intern. 1990; 44: 23–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald GR, Barniville G, Black J, Silke B, Carmody M, O'Dwyer WF. Paracjuat poisoning in agricultural workers. J Irish Med As-soc. 1978; 10: 336–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wesseling C, Hogstedt C, Picado A, Johansson L. Nonintentional fatal paraquat poisonings among agricultural workers in Costa Rica: fifteen case reports. Submitted, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wojeck GA, Price JF, Nigg HN, Stamper JH. Workers' exposure to paraquat and diquat. Arch Environment Contain Toxicol. 1983; 12: 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chster G, Gurunathan G, Jones N, Woollen BH. Occupational exposure of Sri Lankan tea plantation workers to paraquat. WHO Bull. 1982; 71: 625–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chester G, Woolen BH. Studies of the occupational exposure of Malaysian plantation workers to paraquat. Br J Ind Med. 1981; 38: 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Swan AA. Exposure of spray operators to paraquat. Br J Ind Med. 1969;26;322–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staiff DC, Corner SW, Armstrong JF, Wolfe HR. Exposure to the herbicide, paraquat Bull Environ Contam Toidcol. 1975; 14: 334–40.
   Google Scholar
• de Cock J, Heederik D, Hoek F, Boleij J, Kromhout H. Urinary excretion of tetrahydrophthalimide in fruit growers with dermal exposure to captan. Aug Ind Med. 1995; 28: 245–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester G, Hart TB. Biological monitoring of a herbicide applied through backpack and vehicle sprayers. Toxicol Lett. 1986; 33: 137–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean P. Skin penetration. Hazardous chemicals at work. London, England: Taylor and Francis, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Kuile WM. Vergleichungsmessungen mit verschiedenen Geraten zur Bestimmung der Gesamtstaubkonzentration am Arbeit-splatz: teil 2. Staub-Reinh Luft. 1984; 44: 211–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny LC, Aitken R, Chalmers C, et al. A collaborative European study of personal aerosals sampler performance. Ann Occup Hyg. 1996, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies DS. Paraquat poisoning: the rationale for current treatment regimes. Hum Toxicol. 1987; 6: 37–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 1994;2:Method 5003.
   Google Scholar
• Akerblom M. Rapid determination of paraquat in urine with ion pair extraction and spectrophotometry. Bull Environ Contam Toxical. 1990; 45: 157–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham WF, Wolfe HR. Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides. Bull WHO. 1962; 26: 75–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popendorf WJ, Leffingwell JT. Regulating OP pesticide residues for fannworker protection. Residue Rev. 1982; 82: 125–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rappaport SM. Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg. 1991; 35: 61–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM. Selection of the measures of exposures for epidemiology studies. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1991; 6: 448–57.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, de Vreede JAF, van Hemmen 3. Variability and re-producibility of dermal exposure of applicators in greenhouses (abstr). Occup Hyg. April 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cherri JW, Robertson A. Biologically relevant assessment of dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 1995; 39: 387–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuling WJA, Bragt PC, Leenheers LH, de-Kort WLAM. Prediction of percutaneous penetration. Methods, measurements and modelling: dose-excretion study with the pesticide propoxur in volunteers. Southampton, England: IBC Technical Services Ltd., 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud, Division Saneamiento Ambiental, Dept. Substandas Toxicas y Medicina del trabajo. Programa Vigilancia y Control de la Actividad Bananera: Normas de Ubicadcion de Condiciones Fisico-Sanatarias y de Procedimientos para el Manejo con Seguridad de Plaguicidas en las fincas bananeras. San Jose, Costa Rica, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bismuth C, Scherrmann JM, Gamier R, Baud FJ, Pontal PG. Elimination of paraquat. Hum Toxicol. 1987; 6: 63–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athanaselis S, Qammaz S, Alevisopoulos G, Koutselinis A. Percutaneous paraquat intoxication. J. Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol. 1983; 2: 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikrishna V, Edmond Riviere J, Monteiro-Riviere NA. Cutaneous toxicity and absorption of paraquat in porcine skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992; 115: 89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer E, Taitelman U. Exposure to paraquat through skin absorption: clinical and laboratory observations of accidental splashing on healthy skin of agricultural workers. Hum Toxicol. 1989; 8: 483–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffer E, Tzipiniuk A, Gal M, Taitelman U. Skin versus blood distribution of paraquat in experimental animals during percutaneous absorption. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol. 1989; 8: 179–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarty C. Exposure of spray operators to paraquat. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute for Industrial Research and Standards, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Wester RC, Maibach HI, Bucks DAW, Aufrere MB. In vivo percutaneous absorption of paraquat from hand, leg and forearm of humans. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1984; 14: 759–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents in the workroom environment with intended changes for 1995-1996. Cincinnati, Ohio, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Boleij J, Buringh E, Heederik D, Kromhout H. Occupational hygiene of chemical and biological agents. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V., 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology: Physiological Bases of Exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986.
   Google Scholar