Industry Efforts to Weaken the EPA's Classification of the Carcinogenicity of 1,3-Butadiene

References

• Huff JE, Melnick RL, Solleveld HA, Haseman JK, Powers M, Miller RA. Multiple organ carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene in B6C3F1 mice after 60 weeks of inhalation exposure. Science. 1985; 227: 548–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick RL, Huff J. 1,3-Butadiene: toxicity and carcinogenicity in laboratory animals and in humans. Rev Environ Contam Tox-icol. 1992; 124: 11144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick RL, Shackelford CC, Huff J. Carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene. Environ Health Perspect. 1993; 100: 227–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick RL, Huff JE. 1,3-Butadiene induces cancer in experi-mental animals at all concentrations from 6.25 to 8000 parts per million. IARC Sci Publ. 1993; 127: 309-22.
   Google Scholar
• Melnick RL, HuffJ, Chou BJ, Muller RA. Carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene in C57BL/6 x C3J Fl mice at low exposure concen-trations. Cancer Res. 1990; 50: 6592–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaluso M, Larson R, Delzell E, et al. Leukemia and cumula-tive exposure to butadiene, styrene and benzene among work-ers in the synthetic rubber industry. Toxicology. 1996; 113 (1-3): 190–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matanoski G, Elliott E, Tao X, Francis M, Correa-Villasenor A, Santos-Burgoa C. Lymphohematopoietic cancers and butadiene and styrene exposure in synthetic rubber manufacture. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1997; 837: 157–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JB Jr, Abdel-Rahman SZ, Henderson RE et al. Assessment of butadiene exposure in synthetic rubber manufacturing workers in Texas using frequencies of hprt mutant lymphocytes as a biomarker. Chem Biol Interact. 2001;135-6: 465-83.
   Google Scholar
• Report on Carcinogens. 10th ed. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicol-ogy Program, December 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Consensus Review Draft Health Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Janu-ary 2001. Report number EPA/600/P-98/001B:Section 10.11.14.
   Google Scholar
• Toxics Release Inventory. TRI On-site and Off-site Reported Dis-posed of or Otherwise Released (in pounds), for facilities in All Industries, 1,3-Butadiene, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Defense Scorecard. Industrial sectors with reported total environmental releases for 1,3-butadiene. For chemical profile see http://www.scorecarcl.org/chemical-profiles/index.tcl.2004. For hazard ranking see http://www.scorecard.org/chemical-profiles/hazard-indicators.tcl?edfsubstance_id=106%2d99%2d0.
   Google Scholar
• Knox EG. Childhood cancers and atmospheric carcinogens. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59: 101–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs P. EPA to reform management of database used for fed-eral, state regulations. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Washington, DC, September 3. 2002; 170: B–1.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). http://www.epa.gov/reports/objects/iriswebp/iriswebp/iriswebp.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Substance file for 1,3 butadiene. 2002. http://www.epa.gov/tri/.
   Google Scholar
• Delzell E, Sathiakumar N, Hovinga M, et al. A follow-up study of synthetic rubber workers. Toxicology. 1996; 113 (1-3): 182–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward EM, Fajen JM, Ruder AM, Rinsky RA, Halperin WE, Fessler-Fiesch CA. Mortality study of workers in 1,3-butadiene production units identified from a chemical workers cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 1995; 103: 598–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward EM, Fajen JM, Ruder AM, Rinsky RA, Halperin WE, Fessler-Flesch CA. Mortality study of workers employed in 1,3-butadiene production units identified from a large chemical workers cohort. Toxicology. 1996; 113 (1-3): 157–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational Exposure to 1,3-Butadiene, Final Rule. Fed Reg. 1996; 61: 56746-856.
   Google Scholar
• Infante P. Safeguarding scientific evaluations by governmental agencies: case study of OSHA and the 1,3-Butadiene classifica-tion. Int J Occup Env Health. 2005; 11: 372–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An SAB report: Review of the health risk assessment of 1,3-buta-diene. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Science Advisory Board (SAB), Washington, DC, November 19. 1998; Report number EPA-SAB-EHC-99-003. http://www.epa.gov/sab/ehc9903.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grumet J. Letter from Executive Director, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NSCAUM), to Noonan N, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, expressing concern regarding the Butadiene Draft Health Risk Assessment, June 7. 1999. Report number January 1998/E0A/600/P-98/001A.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JP, Collins JF, Salmon AG, Budroe JD. Letter from Cali-fornia Environmental Protection Agency scientists to A. Kop-pikar, U.S. EPA, raising concern regarding the 1998 Preliminary Draft Health risk assessment of 1,3-butadiene, July 8. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Sass J, Greer L, Devine J. Letter from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to Farland W, U.S. EPA, raising con-cern about the 2001 consensus review draft Health Assessment for 1,3-Butadiene, June 15. 2001. EPA Report number EPA/ 600/P-98/001B, January 2001.
   Google Scholar
• EPA's Scientific Advisory Board Panels. Improved Policies and Procedures Needed to Ensure Independence and Balance. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, June 2001. Report number GA0-01-536.
   Google Scholar
• Tomatis L. The IARC monographs program: changing attitudes towards public health. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 144–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelson O, Castleman B, Epstein S, et al. Re: Implementation of WHO Guidelines on Disclosure of Interest by members of WHO Expert Panels. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 271–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass J. Lead IARC towards compliance with WHO/IARC Decla-ration of Interests (DOI) policy. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 277–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass J. Continued insensitivity to conflicts of interest at IARC. bat J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9: 88–9; discussion 89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass JB, Greer L. Re: concern that working group members who will be assessing styrene have financial conflicts of interest. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 153–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick RL. Suppression of crucial information in the IARC evaluation of DEHP. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9: 84–5; discussion 89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff J. IARC monographs, industry influence, and upgrading,downgrading, and under-grading chemicals: a personal point of view. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 249–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial. Transparency at IARC. Lancet. 2003; 361: 189.
   Google Scholar
• Cogliano VJ, Baan PA, Strait' K, et al. The science and practice of carcinogen identification and evaluation. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112: 1269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn E. Bioethics and the political distortion of biomed-ical science. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1379–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbrook R. Science, politics, and federal advisory commit-tees. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1454–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumfiel G. US science policy: mission impossible? Nature. 2004; 428: 250–1.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageid=1320. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. Keeping scientific advice non-partisan. Lancet. 2002;360:1525,
   Google Scholar
• All the President's yes-men? Nature. 2003; 421: 459.
   Google Scholar
• Train ER. When politics trumps science (letter to the editor), New York Times, June 21, 2003.
   Google Scholar