Corporate Corruption of Science—The Case of Chromium(VI)

References

• State of California [homepage on the internet]. OEHHA With-draws Public Health Goal for Chromium [updated 9/11/2001; cited 12/29/2005]. OEHHA. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/public_info/press/nochromphg.html.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Health Services [homepage on the internet]. Scientific Review of Toxicological and Human Health Issues Related to the Development of a Public Health Goal for Chromium (VI) [updated 8/30/2001; cited 12/29/2005]. Flegal R, Last J, McConnell EE, Schenker M, Witschi H. http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/chemicals/chromium6/reviewpanelreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Borneff J, Engelhardt K, Griem W, Kunte H, Reichert J. [Carcinogens in water and soil. XXII. Experiment with 3,4-benzopy-rene and potassium chromate in mice drink]. Arch Hyg Bakte-riol. 1968; 152: 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Los Angeles City Beat [homepage on the internet]. Dropping Science [updated 6/3/2004; cited 12/29/20051. Jacobs C. http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=9548cissuenum=52.
   Google Scholar
• College of the Holy Cross [homepage on the internet]. Allega-tions against PG&E: Is there scientific proof behind them? [updated 4/29/2004; cited 1/2/2006]. Beshire M. http:www.holycross.edu/departments/chemistry/jvandore/envforenspresent2004/pgg.ppt.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Health Services [homepage on the internet]. Chromium-6 in Drinking Water: Timeline [updated 8/26/0005; cited 12/29/2005]. Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management. http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/chemicals/chromium6/cr+6timeline.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yee F. Letter to Vance W. Subject Task Order 4 under Master Agreement 98-004. May 3, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Eric Newman e-mail. Exhibit 31. Blue Ribbon Panel Brief filed 2-21-2003. From Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack. In: Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Finley B. E-mail to Newman E. Subject: LAT & AP stories re: State Action on Chrome 6 Standards. April 6, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• PG&E Status Conference Statement filed May 30, 2000. From Latham and Watkins. In: Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Report of Lobbyist Employer. Exhibit 24. Blue Ribbon Panel Brief filed February 21, 2003. From Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack. In: Aguayo et at. V. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor D. E-mail to Cwik C, Getto E. Subject: Update from So Cal Coalition for Pollution Prevention Meeting. May 15, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Paustenbach D. E-mail to Ladou J. Subject: Comments on the next Egilman paper . . . on chromium. January 8, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Exchange of Expert Witness Information filed May 17, 1999. From Latham and Watkins. In: Aguayo et at. n PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhoff D. Letter to Serrone DM, Gad SC, Kaschak M, Bid-strup PL, Fukuda Y, De Flora S, Mohr U, Korallus U, Lonhoff N. Subject: To the members of the IHF-Chromium-Working-Group. January 30, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak M. Letter to Sword IP. Subject: IRI Project 230154. November 7, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Draffan GH. Letter to Gad SC. Subject: re: Project no. IRI 230154-revised: Acute toxicity studies on five chromium chem-icals conducted on behalf of IHE Chromium Chemicals Envi-ronmental Health and Safety Committee. July 2, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bidstrup PL. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: Iveresk report review. October 9, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• De Flora S. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: re: Acute toxicity reports from Iveresk. September 11, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak M. Letter to De Flora S. Subject: re: Acute toxicity reports from Iveresk. August 24, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak M. Letter to Steinhoff D. Subject: re: Acute toxicity reports from Iveresk. August 24, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhoff D. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: re: Acute toxicity reports from Iveresk. September 4, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Draffan GH, Sword IP. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: re: IRI Pro-ject 230154. December 5, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Farand J. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: Agreement with researcher. July 18, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilli FL, De Flora S. Letter to Kaschak M. Subject: Technical proposal for 1983. January 6, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Exchange of Expert Witness Information filed October 11, 1995. From Hoch S. In: Larry Dale Anderson v. PG&E in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• De Flora S. Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2000; 21: 533–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deposition of Dennis Paustenbach. Vol. 1, p. 62 filed August 29, 2002. From Aguayo et at, v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Blue Ribbon Panel Brief filed February 21, 2003. From Engstrom, Lipscomb 8c Lack. In: Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Chrome Coalition Ad Hoc PEL Committee. Chrome Coalition meeting with ChemRisk: Discussions and Recommendations. February 13, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak M. Special Meeting with ChemRisk. Chrome Coalition Ad Hoc PEL Committee. February 13, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Working Group [homepage on the internet]. Chrome-Plated Fraud: How PG&E's Scientists-for-Hire Reversed Findings of Cancer Study [updated 12/23/2005; cited 12/29/ 2005]. Sharp R, Carini S. http://www.ewg.org/reports/chromium/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JD, Li S. Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in water. J Occup Environ Med. 1997; 39: 315–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman P. Study tied pollutant to cancer; then consultants got hold of it. Wall Street Journal. 2005 Dec 23;A1.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition of Tony Ye. Exhibit 37. Blue Ribbon Panel Brief filed February 21, 2003. From Engstrom, Lipscomb 8c Lack. In: Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak M. Meeting Summary. Chrome Coalition. September 12, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition of Brent Kerger. Vol. 1, p.42, line 23, filed December 4, 2002. From Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenborn J. E-mail to Barnhard J. Subject: OSHA info request. August 28, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rice P. How the Tobacco Industry Lost Its Attorney-Client Priv-ilege. Legal Times. 1998, May 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition of Brent Kerger. Vol. 2, p. 471, filed February 18, 2003. From Aguayo et at. v. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont J. E-mail to Alexeeff G. Subject: Zhang and Li 1997. August 7, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Scientific Issues Regarding Zhang and Li, 1997. March 28, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JD, Li XL. [Chromium pollution of soil and water in Jinzhou]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Vi Xue Za Zhi. 1987; 21: 262–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerger B. Letter to Hoch S. Subject: Articles in Publication. May 20, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Last J. E-mail to Schenker M. Subject: Some text and lots of questions. July 20, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Newman E. E-mail to [email protected]. Subject: Chromium strategic plan. April 6, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor D. E-mail to Alexeeff G. Subject: Chromium summary report. January 2, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Senate hearing of the Senate Health and Human Services Com-mittee. Possible Interference in the Scientific Review of Chromium VI Toxicity. February 28, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition of Dennis Paustenbach. Exhibit 13. Blue Ribbon Panel Brief filed 2-21-2003. From Engstrom, Lipscomb 8c Lack. In Aguayo et at. V. PG&E et at. in Superior Court of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Langard S. E-mail to CrIV panel, July 25. July 23, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Martens D. Chromium, cancer and causation: has a death-blow been dealt to chromium cases in California? Natural Resources and Environment. 2002; 16: 264-6.
   Google Scholar
• Paustenbach D. E-mail to Kerger B. Subject: fw: Expert panel report is OUT! September 17, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman C. The Drowsy Dozen, Esquire Magazine. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kerger B. Chromium and cancer rates: no links proved [letter]. Wall Street Journal. 2006 Jan 9; A9.
   Google Scholar