Pesticide Exports from U.S. Ports, 2001–2003

References

• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ransom P. Women, pesticides and sustainable agriculture. New York: UN Commission on Sustainable Development: 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst P. Agricultural Workers and their Contribution to Sus-tainable Agriculture and Rural Development. Rome: FAO: 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Richter ED. Acute human pesticide poisonings. In D. Pimentel (ed.) Encyclopedia of Pest Management, New York, Dekker, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley N., et al Where is the evidence for treatments used in pesticide poisoning? Is clinical toxicology fiddling while the developing world burns? J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;41(1).
   Google Scholar
• Eddelson M, et al: Pesticide poisoning in the developing world-a minimum list. Lancet. 2002;360.
   Google Scholar
• The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIERA) of 1972;7 U.S.C. s/s 136 et seq. (1972)
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Jefferson D., International Pesticide Trade: Is There Any Hope for the Effective Regulation of Controlled Sub-stances. J. Land Use Sc Envtl. L. 1997;13(1).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA., Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIERA). http://www.epa.gov/oecaagct/lfra.html#Summary% 20of%20the%20Federal%20Insecticide,%20Fungicide,%20and %20Rodenticide%20Act
   Google Scholar
• 40 C.F.R. § 168.75(a). Available from http://lawjustia.com/us/ cfr/ title40/40-23.0.1.1.17.4.19.2.html
   Google Scholar
• 40 C.F.R. § 168.65 (b) (1) (ii). Available from http://law.justia. com/us/cfr/title40/40-23.0.1.1.17.4.19.1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bull D. A Growing Problem: Pesticides and the Third World. Poor. Oxford, UK: OXFAM; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Weir D, Schapiro M. Circle of poison. San Francisco: Institute for Food Development Policy; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. Better regulation of pesticide exports and pesticide residues in imported foods is essential. Washington, DC: GAO:1979.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA: Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 99-1. Federal Reg-ister, March 1, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants. Stockholm: UNEP: 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Proce-dure for certain hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in interna-tional trade. Available from: http://www.pic.int/en/Convention Text/ONU-GB.pdf, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. Automated export system: prospects for improving data collection are uncertain. Washing-ton, DC: GAO: 1997. GAO/NSIAD-98-5.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education (FASE): Exporting banned and hazardous pesticides: a prelimi-nary review. Los Angeles: FASE: 1991. FASE Reports 9 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education: Exporting banned and hazardous pesticides, 1991 statistics. Los Angeles: FASE: 1993. EASE Reports 11 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education: Exporting risk: pesticide exports from U.S. ports, 1992-1994. Los Angeles; FASE: 1996. FASE Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, Root D. The export of pesticides: shipments from U.S. ports, 1995=996. IJOEH. Apr-Jun 1999;5(2).
   Google Scholar
• Smith C. Pesticide exports from U.S. ports 1997-2000. IJOEH. 2001;7(4).
   Google Scholar
• Croplife International. Annual Report 2003-2004. Available from: http://www.croplife.org/library/attachments/6a543c7d-3025-413f-8c37-9f04a2abl 74a/19 /AnnualRe p ort % 202003-2004%202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. UN PIC & U.S. PIGNominated Pesticides List. Wash-ington, DC: EPA, 2006. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ oppfeadl/international/piclist.htna
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. Restricted Use Products Report. Washington: EPA. 2003. http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/rup/rupjun03.htm
   Google Scholar
• This letter can be viewed at: http://www.childenvironment. org/reports/hr_2000-0442_epa.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. Chlorpyrifos revised risk assessment and agreement with registrants. Washington DC: EPA, 2000. http://www.epa. gov/oppsrrdl/op/chlorpyrifos/consumerqs.htm
   Google Scholar
• Whyatt RM et al. Prenatal insecticide exposures and birth weight and length among an urban minority cohort. Environ Health Perspect 112 (10), 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fourth Session of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety. Acutely toxic pesticides: initial input on extent of prob-lem and guidance for risk management. Geneva: IFCS: 2003. Decision document.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The WHO recommended classifi-cation of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification. Geneva: WHO: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kishi M. Acutely toxic pesticides. Boston: JSI Research and Training Institute: 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR Chapter 1 (7-1-05 edi-tion), Section 156.62. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. Label review manual, 3rd edition. Washington DC: EPA; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes J, Lloyd OL, Revitt DM. The influence of personal pro-tection, environmental hygiene and exposure to pesticide on the health of immigrant farm workers in a desert country. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1999;72.
   Google Scholar
• Ecobichon DJ. Pesticide use in developing countries. Toxicol-ogy. 2001;160.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of the applica-tion of pesticides primarily in the United States. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2005;7.
   Google Scholar
• The Rotterdam Convention. Importing country responses. hap: / /reports .pic . int/Reports/ 06-ICRs-Coun try-Parties. asp, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. Report of the chemical review committee on its second meeting. UNEP/FAO/RC/CRC.2/20. Geneva: UNEP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. Stockholm convention: “new POPs. Screening additional POPs candidates. Washington, DC: WWF, 2005. Available from: http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/pubs/New_POPs_FINAL.Pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hallenback WH, Cunnighman-Burns, eds. Pesticides and Human Health. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Pesticide Action Network UK The list of lists. London: Pesticide Action Network: 2005. Briefing 3.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs. List of Chemicals Eval-uated for Carcinogenic Potential. August 21, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• State of California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Proposition 65 in plain language [Internet]. Sacramento: AEHHA: 2007. Avail-able from: http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/background/ p65plain.html.
   Google Scholar
• State of California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Safe drinking water and toxic enforcement act of 1986: chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Sacramento: OEHHA: February 3, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. Chemicals evaluated for carcinogenic potential. Washington DC: EPA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Infante-Rivard C, Labuda D, Krajinovic M, Sinnett D. Risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to pesticides and with gene polymorphisms. Epidemiology. 1999; 10 (5): 481–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahm SH, Ward MH. Pesticides and childhood cancer. Envi-ronmental Health Perspectives. 1998;106 (S3).
   Google Scholar
• Bolognesi C. Genotoxicity of pesticides: a review of human bio-monitoring studies. Mutat Res. 2003; 543 (3): 251–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colborn C, Dumanoski D, Meyers JP. Our stolen future. New York: Dutton; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Health effects of endocrine disruptors [Internet]. Brussels: EC: 2008: Available from: http://europa. eu.int/comm/research/endocrine/background_health_en. html.
   Google Scholar
• Recio R et al. Pesticide exposure alters follicle-stimulating hor-mone levels in mexican agricultural workers. Environmental Health Perspectives. September 2005; 113( 9).
   Google Scholar
• Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK Epigenetic trans-generational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005;308(5727).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D: Economic and environmental benefits of biodiver-sity. BioScience. 1997;47(11).
   Google Scholar
• Vamosi JC et al. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. PNAS. 2006; 103 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Tew J. Protecting honey bees from pesticides. Columbus:Ohio State University: 1996. FactSheet.
   Google Scholar
• Sekerciouglu CH, Daly GC, Ehrlich PR. Ecosystem conse-quences of bird declines. PNAS. 2004; 101 (52)
   Google Scholar
• Mineau P et al. Pesticide acute toxicity reference values for birds. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001; 170.
   Google Scholar
• Mineau P, Whiteside L. Lethal risk to birds from insecticide use in the United States-a spatial and temporal analysis. Environ-mental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2006; 25 (5): 1214–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs TW, Rollins D, Winn J. Reducing pesticide risks to wildlife in cotton. Texas A&M University. Texas Natural Resources Server, 1997. http://texnat.tamu.edu/publications/B-5094. htm#11.
   Google Scholar
• Konradsen F, van der Hoek W, Cole DC., et al Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries-options for restricting the availability of pesticides. Toxicology. 2003; 5 (192 (2-3) ):249-61.
   Google Scholar
• Eddleston M, Karalliedde L, Buckley N., et al Pesticide poison-ing in the developing world-a minimum pesticides list. Lancet. 2002; 360 (9340): 1163–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel F, Hoppin JA. Association of pesticide exposure with neu-rologic dysfunction and disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112 (9): 950–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox C, Surgan M. Unidentified inert ingredients in pesticides: implications for human and environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114 (12): 1803–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JM. Tunnel vision: the regulation of endocrine disruptors. Policy Sciences. 2004; 37.
   Google Scholar
• Don Mayer and Kyle Sable, “Yes! we have no bananas: forum non conveniens and corporate evasion,” 4 Int'l Bus L Rev. 2004;130, 135.
   Google Scholar
• Spano J. Dole must pay farmworkers $3.2 million. The Los Angeles Times. 2007 Nov 6.
   Google Scholar
• Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (2000). Available from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1350.html
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org/campaigns/atca/
   Google Scholar
• Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Dinham B, Malik S. Pesticides and human rights. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9 (1): 40–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbrook CM. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pes-ticide use in the United States: the first eight years. BiotTech Infonet. 2003;Technical Paper Number 6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bosch R: The pesticide conspiracy. New York: Double-day & Company; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken P. Lovins A, Lovins LH. Natural capitalism. New York: Back Bay Books; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough W, Braungart M. Cradle to cradle. New York: North Point Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Daly HE. Operationalizing sustainable development by invest-ing in natural capital. In Jansson, A., et al., eds., Investing in nat-ural capital. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty JN et al. Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environ. Sci. Techno. 2006;40 (4).
   Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. Federal role in 21st century envi-ronmental protection [Internet]. Washington, DC: ACS, 2003. Available from: http://chemistry.org/portal/resources/ACS/ ACSContent/government/statements/2003_statements/ 2003_16_green_incentives_env.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists. Interference at the EPA: science and politics at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cam-bridge, MA: UCS Publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S, Sebastian K, Scherr SE Pilot analysis of global ecosys-tems: agroecosystems, a joint study by international food policy research institute and world resources institute. Washington: IFPRI and WRI; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburger J. IPM that works: the UN FAO IPM programme and the global IPM facility. Global Pesticide Campaigner. 2001; 11 (1)
   Google Scholar