Evidence-Based Toxicology: “Sound Science” in New Disguise

Notes and References

• Hoffmann S, Hartung T. Toward an evidence-based toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006; 25: 497–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBT: Evidence-based Toxicology. Italy. [cited 20081 Available from: www.ebtox.org.
   Google Scholar
• Guzelian PS, Victoroff MS, HaImes NC., et al Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005; 24: 161–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Carcino-gen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum Washington, DC EPA/630/P-03/001F, March 2005. [cited 20081 (Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfin?deid=116283).
   Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Preamble to their Monographs. . [cited 20081 Available from www.iarc.fr
   Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Programme& apos;s 11th Report on Carcino-gens. [cited 20081 Available from;ntp.niehs.nih.gov
   Google Scholar
• Carbone M, Klein G, Gruber J, Wong M. Modern Criteria to Establish Human Cancer Etiology. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 5518–5524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill AB. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causa-tion? Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58: 295–300 (p. 299).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubes G. Epidemiology faces its limits. Science. 1995; 269: 164–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynder EL. Invited Commentary. Response to Science Article, ‘Epidemiology Faces Its Limits’. Am J Epidemiol. 1996; 143: 747–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years-observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1519. (Table 1, p.3)
   Google Scholar
• NRC, National Research Council. Risk assessment in the federal government-Managing the process, National Academy Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• NRC, National Research Council. Science and judgement in risk assessment. Committee on risk assessment of hazardous air pollutants, Commission on life sciences, NRC Washington DC, National Academy Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances Commission Regu-lation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing sub-stances Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market 2003. [cited 20081 Available from:ecbjrc.it
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Carcino-gen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum Washington, DC EPA/630/P-03/001F, March 2005. [cited 2008] (Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=11628 3).
   Google Scholar
• Shelby MD. National Toxicology Program Center for the Evalu-ation of Risks to Human Reproduction: Guidelines for CERHR Expert Panel Members Birth Defects Research (Part B) 2005; 74: 9-16. [cited 2008] Available from: http://cerhtniehs. nih.goy/reports/journal/CERHRguidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meek ME, Bucher JR, Cohen SM., et al A Framework for Human Relevance Analysis of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action. Grit Rev Toxicol. 2003; 33: 591–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boobis AR, Cohen SM, Dellarco V., et al IPCS Framework for Analyzing the Relevance of a Cancer Mode of Action for Humans. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006; 36: 781–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of 6 August 2001adapting to technical progress for the 28th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packag-ing and labelling of dangerous substances Official Journal of the European Communities L 225/1 21.8.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Directive 2003/63/EC on Community code relat-ing to medicinal products for human use (EC, 2003a) amends Directive 2001/83, Annex I.
   Google Scholar
• Tomatis L, Melnick RL, Haseman J., et al Alleged ‘misconcep-tions’ distort perceptions of Environmental cancer risks. EASES J. 2001; 15: 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington DM, Howard TD. From Presumed Benefit to Poten-tial Harm-Hormone Therapy and Heart Disease. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 519–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher JR. The National Toxicology Program Rodent Bioassay. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 982: 198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson H, Graham B, Robinson D., et al Concordance of the Toxicity of Pharmaceuticals in Humans and in Animals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000; 32: 56–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, for example, Mooney C. The Fraud of 'Sound Science.” Gadflyer. 2004 May 13. Available from: www.alternet.org/Story/ 18696.
   Google Scholar
• It is interesting to note that Guzelian et al pay a tribute to judge Osteen's criticism of EPA's 1993 report “Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking” in which EPA concluded that envi-ronmental tobacco smoke is a carcinogen (p. 171). They do not however mention that judge Osteen is a former tobacco lobby-ist or that massive evidence obtained in the years after EPA's 1993 report showed that EPA was right. Neither do they share the information that Osteen's judgment was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals and dismissed on technical grounds(http://www.ocat.org/opposition/industry_campaigns.html). Both IARC and NTP have declared environmen-tal tobacco smoke as being carcinogenic to humans (See www.iarc.fr, National Toxicology Programme's 1 1 th Report on Carcinogens [ntp.niehs.nih.gov].) Judge Osteen's criticism is available at: http: / /www.tobacco.org/Documents/ 98071 '7 osteen.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ong EK, Glantz AS. Constructing “sound science” and “good epidemiology": Tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 1749–1757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Documents relating to Guzelian's involvement with the tobacco industry [cited 20081. Available from: http://tobaccodocu ments.org/profiles/guzelian_philip.html, http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu and http://tobaccodocuments.org.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition of Philip S. Guzelian in the case of Jesus Delaluz v. Safety-Kleen Corporation, et al., Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, May 13, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Trial Testimony of Philip S. Guzelian in the case of Jesus Delaluz v. Safety-Kleen Corporation, et al., Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, June 8, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Atlantic Legal Foundation. Atlantic Legal News Archive. [cited 2008] Available from: http://www.atlanticlegal.org/newsitern. php?nid=40.
   Google Scholar
• Atlantic Legal Foundation. Sound Science. [cited 20081 Avail-able from: http://www.atlanticlegal.org/program.php?catid=2.
   Google Scholar
• Deposition Of Philip S. Guzelian, Jr., M.D. Cause No. 96-Cvq01439-D3; Manuela Navarro, vs. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company D/B/A Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al. 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas May 28, 1999.
   Google Scholar