Physiotherapeutic interactions: A review of the power dynamic

References

• Pratt JW & Seddon V. Sensitivity training with pre- clinical students. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 310–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerrard B, Bonniface W & Love B. Interpersonal Skills For Health Professionals. Reeston Publishing Company: Virginia, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson DA & Maxwell M. The interpersonal dimension of physiotherapy: implications for training. Physiotherapy 1985; 71: 306–10.
   Google Scholar
• Guccione A A & DeMont ME. Interpersonal skills education in entry level physical therapy programmes. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 388–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C & Maas F. Interpersonal skills and occupational therapy. Br J Occupât Ther 1992; 55 (10).
   Google Scholar
• Gartland GJ. Teaching the therapeutic relationship. Physiother Canada 1984; 36: 25–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gartland GJ. Communication skills and instruction in Canadian physical therapy schools. Physiother Canada 1984; 36: 379–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron C. Patient compliance: recognition of factors involved and suggestions for promoting compliance with therapeutic regimes. J Adv Nursing 1996; 24: 244–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenen HJJ. Patients rights. World Health 1996; 5: 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Klaber Moffett JA & Richardson PH. The influence of the physiotherapist—patient relationship on pain and disability. Physiother Theory Pract 1997; 13: 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson DA & Maxwell M. A comparative study of physiotherapy students' attitudes to social skills training undertaken before and after placement. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 60–4.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF. A model for teaching interviewing and communication skills to physiotherapy students. Physiother Canada 1984; 36 (1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payton OD. Effects of instruction in basic communication skills on physical therapists and physical therapy students. Phys Ther 1983; 63:1292–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough A. Communication in health care. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 56–9.
   Google Scholar
• Redfern L. Power and authority: is there a difference? Nursing Times 1996; 92: 36–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastide R. The Sociology of Mental Disorder. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Myerscough PR. Talking With Patients: A Basic Clinical Skill. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. Patients, Practitioners and Medical Care: Aspects of Medical Sociology. William Heinemann Medical Books: London, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden J. Health Psychology: A Textbook. Open University Press: Buckingham, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G. Accounting for power: nurse teachers' and students' perceptions of power in their relationship. Nurse Education Today 1993; 13: 111–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewison A. Nurses' power in interactions with patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1995; 21: 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sully P. The impact of power in therapeutic relationships. Nursing Times 1996; 92 (41).
   Google Scholar
• May C. Patient autonomy and the politics of professional relationships. J Adv Nursing 1995; 21: 83–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert T. Nursing: empowerment and the problem of power. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1995; 21: 865–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnball J. Taking control. Nursing Times. 1994; 90: 56–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sines D. Balance of power. Nursing Times. 1993; 89 (46).
   Google Scholar
• Blesedell Crepeau E. Achieving inter subjective understanding: examples from an occupational therapy treatment session. Am J Occupât Ther 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons M. Reflections on client—therapist relations. Aust Occupât Ther J 1994; 41: 27–9.
   Google Scholar
• Peloquin SM. The patient-therapist relationship in occupational therapy: understanding visions and images. Am J Occupât Ther 1990; 44 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peloquin SM. The patient-therapist relationship: beliefs that shape care. Am J Occupât Ther 1993; 47: 935–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch M. Power and family therapy, and the systemic- organismic paradigm. Contemporary Family Therapy—Special Issue: Power and Family Therapy 1988; 10: 98–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman J. Politics and power in therapy. A discussion on the implications of postmodern ideas for therapeutic practices. Aust NZ J Fam Ther 1993; 14: 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Goldner V. Power and hierarchy: let's talk about it. Family Process 1993; 32: 157–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levold T. The therapy of power and the power of therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy —Special Issue: Power and Family Therapy 1988; 10: 84 -97.
   Google Scholar
• Ludewig K. The client: therapists partner or therapists opponent? Thoughts on the question of power and co-operation in therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy—Special Issue: Power and Family Therapy. 1988; 10: 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols MP. The therapist as authority figure. Family Process 1993; 32: 163–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen IR. Power, boundaries, inter subjectivity. Br J Med Psychol 1995; 68: 97–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puskar KR & Hess MR. Considerations of power by graduate student nurse psychotherapists: a pilot study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 1986; 8: 51–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon GM. Revisiting the notion of hierarchy. Family Process 1993; 32: 147–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson RH. Analysis of the concept of mutuality. Image- Journal of Nursing Scholarship. Image 1997; 29: 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Working for Patients. Cmnd 555. London: HMSO, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The Patients Charter. London: HMSO, 1991a.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The New NHS: Modern. Dependable. London: HMSO, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National Health Service and Community Care Act. London: HMSO, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Thornquist E. Body communication is a continuous process. Scand ] Prim Health Care 1991 9: 191–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CSP. Rules of Professional Conduct. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The Health of the Nation. London: HMSO: 1991b.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent C. Patient power. Nursing Times 1989; 29: 73–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman DD. Physical therapy interaction in the home. Caring 1992; 11: 16–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers F & MacDonald C. Power to the people? Involving users and carers in needs assessment and care planning—views from the practitioner. Health and Social Care in the Community 1996; 4: 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis K. Power games. Community Care 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M & Zarb G. Personal services. Community Care, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care—how can it be assessed? J Am Manage Assoc 1988; 260: 1743–8.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson B. Qualitative approaches to evaluating quality of service. Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 541–5.
   Google Scholar
• Thow M & Murray R. Medical humanities in physiotherapy: education and practice. Physiotherapy 1991; 77: 733–6.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun D & Kellehear A. Health Research in Practise. Chapman Hall: London, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen GM. Qualitative methods in physical therapy research: a form of disciplined inquiry. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam SB. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey Bass Publishers: San Francisco, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bork CE. Research in Physical Therapy. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Stone S. Qualitative research methods for physiotherapists. Physiotherapy 1991; 77: 449–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner JA. Reviewing qualitative research: proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. J Occupât Ther 1994; 14: 78–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: assessment of the trustworthiness. Am ] Occupât Ther 1990; 45: 214–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke L. Qualitative research: meaning and language. J Adv Nursing 1992; 17: 243 -52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firby P. Critiquing the ethical aspects of a study. Nurse Researcher 1995; 3: 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres Rosa S & Risteen Hasselkus B. Connecting with patients: the personal experience of professional helping. J Occupât Ther 1995; 16: 245–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J. Truthfulness in the therapeutic relationship. Physiother Theory Pract 1986; 2: 121–7.
   Google Scholar
• Barnitt R. What gives you sleepless nights? Ethical practice in occupational therapy. Br J Occupât Ther 1993; 56: 207–12.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M & Webb C. The power of social judgement: struggle and negotiation in the nursing process. Nurse Education Today 1995; 15: 83–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd SB. The use of benevolent power in patient care and education. Can J Med Radiation Technol 1993; 24: 25–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carkhuff R. Helping and human relations, Vol 11. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Duckett P & Kidd L. Counselling skills and the physiotherapist. Physiotherapy 1985; 71: 179.
   Google Scholar
• Fried BJ. Power acquisition in a health care setting: an application of strategic contingencies theory. Human Relations 1989; 41: 915–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson BJ. Hierarchy: the imbalance of risk. Family Process 1993; 32: 167–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaskas C & Humphreys C. Theorising about power: intersecting the ideas of Foucault with the 'problem' of power in family therapy. Family Process. 1993; 32: 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A. Power and knowledge in nursing practice: the contribution of Foucault. J Adv Nursing 1994; 20: 935–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power strategies. In: Gordon C (ed.) Power/Knoioledge: Selected Intervieivs and Other Writings 1972-1977 by Michael Foucault. Pantheon: New York, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes S. Power: a Radical Vieiv. Macmillan: London, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh M. A typology of social power. In: Kakabadse A and Parker C (eds) Politics and Organisations. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. Sociology. Polity Press: Cambridge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan M. Enabling patients to make informed decisions. Nursing Times 1995; 91: 27–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom SW & Wilson, RN. Patient practitioner relationships. In: Freeman HE, Levine S, Reeder LG (eds) Handbook of Medical Sociology. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Discipline and Punish. Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Guccione AA. Compliance and patient autonomy: ethical and legal limits to professional dominance. Top Geriatr Rehab il 1988; 3: 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons T. The Social System. Free Press of Glencoe: Glencoe, II, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan JL & Blake DR. Patient non-compliance: deviance or reasoned decision making? Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 507–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein L & Bernstein RS. Interviewing: A Guide for Health Professionals (3rd edn) Appleton-Century- Crofts: New York, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff G. A small dose of commonsense— communication, persuasion and physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 1982; 68: 327–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cartwright AD & O'Brien M. Social class variables in health care and in the nature of general practice consultation. In: Stacy M (eds) The Sociology of the National Health Service University of Keele: Keele, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R & Scambler G. Social class, ethnicity and illness. In: Fitzpatrick R, Hinton J, Newman S, Scambler G, Thompson J (eds) The Experience of Illness. Tavistock: London, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R. Attitudes don't just hang in the air.... disabled people's perceptions of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 1993; 79: 619–27.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum-Carmeli & Carmeli, YS. Patients who get what they want: policy and power in the context of prenatal care. Human Organisation 1996; 55 (2).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence J. Doctor, doctor you're not on my wavelength. Independent, 1997b Aug 20.
   Google Scholar
• Richards G. No GP deserves these patients. Independent, 1997 Aug 26.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden EL. Values in conflict: hospital culture shock. Phys Ther 1980; 60: 289–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnitt R. Truth telling in occupational therapy. Br J Occupât Ther 1994; 57: 334 -40.
   Google Scholar
• Purtilo RB. Applying the principles of informed consent to patient care: legal and ethical considerations for physical therapy. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 934–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond P. Treating patients as equals has much to commend it, but how many of them know their oesophagus from their elbow? Independent, 1997a Jan 21.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond P. Tt gives me a feeling of personal safety' said the GP of his replica. Independent, 1997b Aug 12.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman F. Communication problems: a patient's view. Nursing Times 1995; 91: 30–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argyle M. Bodily Communication (2nd edn) Metheun: London, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL & Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Winship G. Patient empowerment—individualism v collectivism. Therapeutic Communities 1995; 16: 113–66.
   Google Scholar
• Endelman C. Political Language. Academic Press: New York, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Jacono BJ & Jacono J. Power tactics and their potential impact on nursing. J Adv Nursing 1994; 19: 954–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison A. Power of language in a ward for the care of older people. Nursing Times. 1995a; 91: 32–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webb Nursing and the nursing process. J Adv Nursing 1981;6: 369–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobitz C & Shepard K. Effect of compatibility on goal achievement in patient - physical therapist dyads. Phys Ther 1983 63: 319 -24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadow S. Advocacy: an ethical model for assisting patients with treatment decisions. In: Wong CB, Swanzy JP (eds) Dilemmas of Dying: Policies and Procedures of Decisions Not to Treat. GK Hall Medical Publishers: Boston, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Kottier JA & Brown RW. Introduction to therapeutic counselling. Brooks/Cole Publishing: Pacific Grove, CA, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooijen AJ. The implications of the behaviour of patients in the illness role on the psychosocial relationship of physiotherapists with their patients. S Afr J Physiother 1993; 49: 43–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Ellyson S, Keating C, Heltman K & Brown CE. The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. J Personality and Social Psychology 1988; 54: 233–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson KA. Comment on Crocker's 'An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment. Signs 1984; 9: 497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein L. A case study of threatened violence in the female therapist/male patient relationship. Women and Therapy 1991; 11: 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Casualty at risk of violence: NHS. Independent, 1997 Aug 26.
   Google Scholar
• Brownmiller S. Against Our Will. Penguin: London, 1975 [reprinted 1983].
   Google Scholar
• Stanko EA. Intimate Intrusions: Women's Experience of Male Violence. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• McComas J, Hebert C, Giacomin C, Kaplan D & Dulberg C. Experiences of student and practising physical therapists with inappropriate patient sexual behaviour. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• McComas J, Kaplan D & Giacomin C. Inappropriate patient sexual behaviour in physiotherapy practice: A qualitative analysis of questionnaire comments. Physiother Canada 1995; 47: 127–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korsch BM, Freeman B & Negrete VF. Practical implications of doctor patient interaction: analysis for paediatric practice. Am J Dise Children 1971; 121: 110–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waterworth S & Luker K. Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care? J Adv Nursing 1990; 15: 971–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence J. NHS Trust in Court for putting staff at risk. Independent, 1997a Aug 14.
   Google Scholar
• Burrel I. Nurses face most violence at work. Independent, 1997 Dec 7.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill J. Patient participation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nursing 1996; 24: 561–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard P. Why participate at all? In: Fry J, Hassler, J. Primary Health Care 2000. Churchill Livingstone: London, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton S. Patient participation: an underdeveloped concept. J Roy Soc Health 1988; 108: 55–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry J & Hassler J. Primary Health Care 2000. Churchill Livingstone: London, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Payton OD & Nelson CE. A preliminary study of patients' perceptions of certain aspects of their physiotherapy experience. Physiother Theory Pract 1996; 12: 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Purtilo RB, Meier RH. Team challenges: regulatory constraints and patient empowerment. American J Phys Med Rehabilit 1993; 72: 327–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin N & Teasdale K. Caring versus empowerment: considerations for nursing practice. J Adv Nursing 1991; 16: 657–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardener S. Women and space—ground rules and social maps. Berg: Oxford, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly JB. Power of positive patient relations. Clinical Management 1991; 11: 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Savage J. Sexuality an uninvited guest. Nursing Times, 1989; 85: 25–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall T. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday: New York, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Sack RD. Conceptions of Space in Social Thought. Macmillan: London, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin B. Changes and challenges: The NHS White Paper. Physiotherapy 1998; 84: 155–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pope C & Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. Br Med J 1995; 311: 42–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK & Lincoln TS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage: London, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG. Criteria for assessing trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Resources Information Centre Annual Review Paper. 1981; 29: 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard KF, Jensen GM, Schmoll BJ, Hack LM & Gwyer J. Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: positivism and phenomenology. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway IS & Wheeler S. Qualitative Research for Nurses. Blackwell: Oxon, 1996.
   Google Scholar