Advanced search
Publication Cover
Public Archaeology Volume 4, 2005 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
243
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Becoming Binford: Fun ways of teaching archaeological theory and method

Claire Smith
&
Heather Burke
Pages 35-49 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013

  • Adams, P.C. Teaching and earning with SimCity 2000. Journal of Geography 97 (1998) 47-55.
  • Allegretti, C.L. and Frederick, J.N. A model for thinking critically about ethical issues. Teaching of Psychology 22 (1995) 46-48.
  • AI-Saadat, A. and Afifi, E. Role-playing for inhibited students in paternal communities. English Teaching Forum Online 35 (1997) 43. http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vo135/no3/p43.htm (last accessed 1 October 2004).
  • Banning, E.B. The Archaeologist’s Laboratory. The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Kluwer/Plenum, New York (2000).
  • Barber, R. Doing Historical Archaeology. Exercises Using Oral, Documentary and Material Evidence. Prentice Hall, New York (1994).
  • Bell,J .A. Reason vs. relativism. Ian Hodder’s Reading the Past. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6 (1987) 75-86.
  • Binford, L.R. Interassemblage variability-the Mousterian and the ‘functional’ argument. In Renfrew, C. (ed.) The Explanation of Culture Change. Models in Prehistory. Duckworth, London (1973) 227-254.
  • Binford, L.R. (with Stone, N .M.) Archaeology and theory: reply to Ian Hodder. Man 23 (1988) 374–376.
  • Binford, L.R. Science to seance, or processual to ‘post-processual’ archaeology. In: Binford, L. R. (ed.) Debating Archaeology. Academic Press, San Diego CA (1989) 27-400.
  • Bluestone, C. Feature films as a teaching tool. College Teaching 48 (2000) 141-146.
  • Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1, 1991). George Washington University Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington DC (1991).
  • Bordes, F. On the chronology and contemporaneity of different Palaeolithic cultures in France. In: Renfrew, C. (ed.) The Explanation of Culture Change. Models in Prehistory. Duckworth, London (1973) 217-226.
  • Brown,P.L. Go fish (or, deconstruct this). New York Times Section 4 (21 March, 2004).
  • Burges, P. Improvisational acting and language learning. English Teaching Forum 30 (1992) 20-23.
  • Burke, H. and Smith, C. Seven degrees of archaeology, or diverse ways of interpreting the past. In: Burke, H. and Smith, C. (eds) Archaeology to Delight and Instruct. University College London Press, London, in press.
  • Chilcoat,G.W. Instructional behaviors for clearer presentations in the classroom. Instructional Science 18 (1989) 289-314.
  • Cowgill, G. Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist 95 (1993) 551-573.
  • Daniels, S. and David, N. The Archaeology Workbook. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia PA (1982).
  • David,N. and Driver,J. The Next Archaeology Workbook. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia PA (1989).
  • Dixon, W.W. Disaster and Memory: Celebrity Culture and the Rise of Hollywood Cinema. Columbia University Press, New York (1999).
  • Earle, T. and Preucel, R. Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology 28 (1987) 501-527.
  • Fink, L.D. Active learning. http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/active.htm (1999)( last accessed 29 September 2004).
  • Gamble, C. Archaeology. The Basics. Routledge, London (2001).
  • Gauntlett, D. Theory trading cards. http://www.theory.org.uk/davidltheorycards.htm (2004) ( last accessed 1 October 2004).
  • Griffiths, Y. and Ursik,K. Using active learning to shift the habits of learning in health care education. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 2 (2004).
  • Hamilakis, Y. Archaeology and the politics of pedagogy. World Archaeology 36 (2004) 287–309.
  • Hodder, I. Post-processual archaeology. In: Schiffer, M. (ed.) Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8. Academic Press, New York (1985) 1-26.
  • Hodder, I. Post-processual archaeology and the current debate. In: Preucel, R. W. (ed.) Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 10. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale IL (1991) 30–41.
  • Hodder, I. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Routledge, London and New York (1992).
  • Hodder, I. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
  • Johnson, M. Archaeological Theory. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
  • Kezar, A.J. Higher Education Trends (1997-1999): Instruction. ERIC-HE Trends. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 990-000-36). Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC (1999).
  • Layton, R. Analogy in archaeological interpretation. In: Goldsmith, A. Garvie, S. Selin, D. and Smith, J. (eds) Ancient Images, Ancient Thought: the Archaeology of Ideology. The University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary (1992) 211-222.
  • Leff, L.J. Hemingway and His Conspirators: Hollywood, Scribners, and the Making of American Celebrity Culture. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham MD (1997).
  • McCarthy,J.P. and Anderson, L. Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education 24 (2000) 279-294.
  • McKeachie, W.J. Chism, N., Menges, R., Svinicki, M. and Weinstein, C.E. Teaching Tips. Heath, Lexington MA (1994).
  • McKeachie, W.J. and Hofer, B.K. McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. (10th edition). Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston MA (1999).
  • Megaw, J.V.S. The present past? A minimal view of ethnographic analogy and rock art. In: Smith, M. (ed.) Archaeology at ANZAAS 1983. Western Australian Museum, Perth (1983) 1279-292.
  • Nilson, L.B. Teaching at its Best: A Research-based Resource for College Instructors. Anker Publishing Company, Inc. (1998).
  • Pluciennik, M. Theory as praxis. In: Rainbird, P. And Hamilakis, Y. (eds) Interrogating Pedagogies: Archaeology in Higher Education. British Archaeological Reports S948, Oxford (2001).
  • Praetzellis, A. Death by Theory. AltaMira Press, Walnut Grove (2000).
  • Rainbird, P. and Hamilakis, Y. (eds) Interrogating Pedagogies. Archaeology in Higher Education. British Archaeological Reports S948, Oxford (2001).
  • Rice, P. Doing Archaeology. A Hands-On Laboratory Manual. Mayfield Publishing Company, Palo Alto CA (1998).
  • Roberts, L.C. Dean, E. and Nienhuis, T. Lights, camera, action: teaching with feature film in the social sciences. MountainRise (Electronic journal) 1 (2003) http://mountainrise.wcu.edu/issue.html (last accessed 1 October 2004).
  • Rohrlich, M. Yes, a President beats a King. New York Times 19 October, Late Edition Final, Section 1, Column 1 (2003) 39.
  • Ruhl, K.L. Hughes, C.A. and Schloss, P.J. Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher Education and Special Education 10 (1987) 14–18.
  • Russell, I.J. Hendricson, W.D. and Herbert, R.J. Effects of lecture information density on medical student achievement. Journal of Medical Education 59 (1984) 881-889.
  • Sackett, J. The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model. American Antiquity 42 (1977) 369–380.
  • Sackett, J. Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: a reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 50 (1985) 154-160.
  • Sackett, J. Style and ethnicity in archaeology: the case for isochrestism. In: Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C. (eds) The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) 32-43.
  • Savage, H. and Dinsmore, E. Exercises in Archaeological Methods and Techniques. Partial Curriculum for Anthro 156-103: Digging Up the Past! Approaches to Archaeology. http://archaeology.asu.edu/Jordan/Archlabs.pdf (accessed 4 October 2004) (1998).
  • Silberman, M. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach any Subject. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1996).
  • Smith, E.T. and Boyer, M.A. Designing in-class simulations. Political Science and Politics 29 (1996) 690-694.
  • Tilley, C. On modernity and archaeological discourse. In: Bapty, I. and Yates, T. (eds) Archaeology after Structuralism. Routledge, London (1990) 128-152.
  • Wiessner, P. Style and social information in Kalahari projectile points. American Antiquity 49 (1983) 253-276.
  • Wiessner, P. Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity 50 (1985) 160-165.
  • Wiessner, P. Is there a unity to style? In: Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C. (eds) The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) 105-112.
  • Wylie, A. The reaction against analogy. In: Schiffer, M.I. (ed.) Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. Academic Press, New York (1985) 63-111.
  • Wylie, A. Questions of evidence, legitimacy and the (dis)unity of science. American Antiquity 65 (2000) 227–237.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.