References
- Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR. Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA 1998;280:296-7
- Couzin J, Unger K. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail. Science 2006;312:38-43
- Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 2009;4:e5738
- Nath SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? Med J Aust 2006;185:152-4
- Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:609-13
- Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:464-70
- PLoS Medicine Editors. Making sense of non-financial competing interests. PLoS Med 2008;5:e199
- McHenry L. Biomedical research and corporate interests: A question of academic freedom. Eth Iss Biomed 2008;6:146-56
- Woolley KL. Goodbye Ghostwriters!: How to work ethically and efficiently with professional medical writers. Chest 2006;130:921-3
- Industry Funding of Medical Education: Report of an AAMC Task Force. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2008. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Chipperfield L, Citrone L, Clark J., et al. Authors’ submission toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:1967-82
- CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2009 Update. Reston, VA: Council of Science Editors, 2009. Available at: www.councilscienceeditors.org [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2010. Available at: www.icmje.org [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Policy statement: ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. World Association of Medical Editors, 2005. Available at: www.wame.org/resources/policies#ghost [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:454-65
- Patsopoulos NA, Ioannidis JP, Analatos AA. Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ 2006;332:1061-4
- Definition of research misconduct. US Office of Research Integrity, 2009. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/misconduct/definition_misconduct.shtml [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Woolley KL, Ely JA, Woolley MJ. et al. Declaration of medical writing assistance in international peer-reviewed publications. JAMA 2006;296:932-4
- Gotzsche PC, Kassirer JP, Woolley KL, et al. What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature? PLoS Med 2009;6:e23
- World Bank Country Classifications. World Bank, 2007. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/a-short-history [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D, et al. Research methods & reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 2009;339:b4330
- Hamilton CW, Royer MG, AMWA 2002 Task Force on the Contributions of Medical Writers to Scientific Publications. AMWA position statement on the contributions of medical writers to scientific publications. AMWA J 2003;18:13-16
- Jacobs A, Wager E. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:317-22
- Norris R, Bowman A, Fagan JM, et al. International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) position statement: The role of the professional medical writer. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:1837-40
- Stossel TP. Has the hunt for conflicts of interest gone too far? Yes. BMJ 2008;336:476
- Jacobs A, Hamilton CW. Decreased evidence of ghostwriting in a 2008 vs 2005 survey of medical writers. The Write Stuff 2009;18:118-23
- Lee K. Has the hunt for conflicts of interest gone too far? No. BMJ 2008;336:477
- Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Swiontkowski MF, et al. Who did what? (Mis)perceptions about authors’ contributions to scientific articles based on order of authorship. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1605-9
- Moreno E, Gutierrez JM. Ten simple rules for aspiring scientists in a low-income country. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000024
- Lin G. China issues another crackdown on scientific misconduct. Science and Development Network (SciDev.Net), 2009. Available at: www.scidev.net/en/news/china-issues-another-crackdown-on-scientific-misco.html [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Raghuram N. We must restore scientific integrity in Indian research. Science and Development Network (SciDev.Net), 2008. Available at: www.scidev.net/en/opinions/we-must-restore-scientific-integrity-in-indian-res.html [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Xin H. Scientific misconduct. Retractions put spotlight on China’s part-time professor system. Science 2009;323:1280-1
- Opinions on strengthening research integrity of our country. Joint Committee for Promoting Research Integrity of China, 2009. Available at: www.sinori.net/jsp/archives/archivesViewDtEn!archivesViewDtEn.action?modelId=1&columnId=&archivesId=3621 [Last accessed 24 January 2011]
- Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics 2011;37:249-53