Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark – a discrete choice experiment

References

• Schramm TK, Gislason GH, Kober L, et al. Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people. Circulation 2008;117:1945-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick J, Chase HP, Slover RH, et al. Missed insulin meal boluses and elevated hemoglobin A1c levels in children receiving insulin pump therapy. Pediatrics 2004;113:e221-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1218-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Evans JM. Adherence to insulin and its association with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. QJM 2007;100:345-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, et al. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Lancet 1997;350:1505-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeyen SG, Hoste EA, Roosens CD, et al. Adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol in the critically ill: a prospective observational study. Am J Crit Care 2007;16:599-608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randlov J, Poulsen JU. How much do forgotten insulin injections matter to hemoglobin a1c in people with diabetes? A simulation study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:229-35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 2001;23:1296-310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Kruger DF, et al. Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care 2010;33:240-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristides M, Weston AR, FitzGerald P, et al. Patient preference and willingness-to-pay for Humalog Mix25 relative to Humulin 30/70: a multicountry application of a discrete choice experiment. Value Health 2004;7:442-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes 2008;57:3169-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiel SA, Dixon T, Mann R, et al. Hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2008;25:245-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DJ, Irvine A, Gonder-Frederick L, et al. Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization. Diabetes Care 1987;10:617-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine AA, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L. Fear of hypoglycemia: relationship to physical and psychological symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Psychol 1992;11:135-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundkvist J, Berne C, Bolinder B, et al. The economic and quality of life impact of hypoglycemia. Eur J Health Econ 2005;6:197-202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marrett E, Radican L, Davies MJ, et al. Assessment of severity and frequency of self-reported hypoglycemia on quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents: a survey study. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leiter LA, Yale JF, Chiasson JL, et al. Assessment of the impact of fear of hypoglycemic episodes on glycemic and hypoglycemia management. Can J Diabetes 2005;29:186-92
   Google Scholar
• Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia: still the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes. Endocr Pract 2008;14:750-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jendle J, Torffvit O, Ridderstrale M, et al. Willingness to pay for health improvements associated with anti-diabetes treatments for people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:917-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIP Or. ‘Det Nationale Indikatorprojekt -- diabetes’ 2009. Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/Fil.ashx?id=9993&ext=pdf&navn=diabetes2009_nat_sfa.pdf [Last accessed 18 October 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000;320:1530-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003;2:55-64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhfeld WF. Marketing research methods in SAS: experimental design, choice conjoint and graphical techniques: SAS Institute, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Barker N. A Practical Introduction to the Bootstrap Using the SAS System. Wallingford, UK: Oxford Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health 2011;14:403-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JT, Tsou MW, Hammitt JK. Willingness to pay for weight-control treatment. Health Policy 2009;91:211-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaro A, Barberan R, Rubio E. Private and social time preferences for health and money: an empirical estimation. Health Econ 2001;10:351-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBonaventura MD, Wagner JS, Girman CJ, et al. Multinational Internet-based survey of patient preference for newer oral or injectable Type 2 diabetes medication. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;4:397-406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratley R, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. One year of liraglutide treatment offers sustained and more effective glycaemic control and weight reduction compared with sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Int J Clin Pract 2011;65:397-407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin RR, Peyrot M, Siminerio LM. Health care and patient-reported outcomes: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1249-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere JJ, Timmermans HJP. Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research: a review. Leisure Science 1990;12:9-32
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 2009;18:389-401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010;172;(11):1292-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannetun E, Tegnell A, Giesecke J. Parents' attitudes towards hepatitis B vaccination for their children. A survey comparing paper and web questionnaires, Sweden 2005. BMC Public Health 2007;7:86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekman A, Dickman PW, Klint A, et al. Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2006;21:103-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund E, Gram IT. Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:154-60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael Bowling J, Rimer BK, Lyons EJ, et al. Methodologic challenges of e-health research. Eval Program Plann 2006;29:390-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinadinovic K, Wennberg P, Berman AH. Population screening of risky alcohol and drug use via Internet and Interactive Voice Response (IVR): a feasibility and psychometric study in a random sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010;114(1):55-60
   Google Scholar
• Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, et al. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res 2007;9:e25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiøtz M, Bøgelund M, Willaing I. Challenges using online surveys in a Danish population of people with type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness 2011;7:in press; Epub ahead of print September 20
   Google Scholar
• Loftus EV Jr. A practical perspective on ulcerative colitis: patients' needs from aminosalicylate therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006;12:1107-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan S, Roberts T. Preferences for health care programmes – results from a general population discrete choice survey. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, eds. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Bech M, Sorensen J, Lauridsen J. Eliciting women's preferences for a training program in breast self-examination: a conjoint ranking experiment. Value Health 2005;8:479-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar