Value of a gene signature assay in patients with early breast cancer and intermediate risk: a single institution retrospective study

References

• EBCTCG. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;365:1687-717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekih M, Petit T, Zarca D, et al. [Use of guidelines and heterogeneity of decision making for adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer: results of a French national survey]. Bull Cancer 2014;101:918-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E, et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2783-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnant M, Filipits M, Greil R, et al. Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. Ann Oncol 2014;25:339-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen T, Wallden B, Schaper C, et al. Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. BMC Cancer 2014;14:177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnant M, Sestak I, Filipits M, et al. Identifying clinically relevant prognostic subgroups of postmenopausal women with node-positive hormone receptor positive early stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: a combined analysis of ABCSG-8 and ATAC using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score and intrinsic subtype. Ann Oncol 2015;26(8):1685–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1446-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lænkholm A, Jensen M, Eriksen J, et al. Prediction of 10yr distant recurrence (DR) using the Prosigna (PAM50) assay in a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort of postmenopausal Danish women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) allocated to 5yr of endocrine therapy (ET) alone. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(Suppl):abstr 546
   Google Scholar
• Ejlertsen B, Jensen M, Eriksen J, et al. Validation of prediction of distant recurrence (DR) by Prosigna (PAM50) in subgroups of a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort of node-positive (N1), hormone receptor positive (HR+), postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients allocated 5yr of endocrine therapy (ET). J Clin Oncol 2015;33(Suppl):abstr 513
   Google Scholar
• Lænkholm A, Jensen M, Eriksen J, et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence (DR) using the Prosigna (PAM50) test in a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort of postmenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) allocated to 5yr of endocrine therapy (ET). J Clin Oncol 2015;33(Suppl): abstr 544
   Google Scholar
• Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, et al. Tailoring therapies – improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 2015;26(8):1533–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson JJ, Roth JA. The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;141:13-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Gonzalez-Rivera M, Morales S, et al. Prospective study of the impact of the Prosigna assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in unselected patients with estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor negative, node negative early-stage breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin 2015;31:1129-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipits M, Nielsen TO, Rudas M, et al. The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:1298-305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestak I, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence after 5 years of endocrine treatment: a combined analysis of patients from the Austrian breast and colorectal cancer study group 8 and arimidex, tamoxifen alone or in combination randomized trials using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:916-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1829-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:4273-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J, et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:1067-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubsky P, Brase JC, Jakesz R, et al. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013;109:2959-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestak I, Dowsett M, Zabaglo L, et al. Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1504-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar