Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements

References

• McGillivray B, Jenset G, Salama K, et al.Investigating patterns of change, stability, and interaction among scientific disciplines using embeddingsHumanit Soc Sci Commun20229285 10.1057/s41599-022-01267-5
   Google Scholar
• Biglan AThe characteristics of subject matter in different academic areasJAppl Psychol1973573195203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker TTowards a definition of disciplinary culturesStudies in Higher Educ198262109122 10.1080/03075078112331379362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodahl J, Gordon GThe structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departmentsAm SociologRer19723715772 10.2307/2093493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry RP, Smart JCThe scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective2007DordrechtSpringer Science+Business Media 10.1007/1-4020-5742-3
   Google Scholar
• Almarsdottir AB, Granas AGSocial pharmacy and clinical pharmacy-Joining forcesPharmacy (Basel).201541 28970374 5419355 10.3390/pharmacy4010001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes ER, Desselle SPIs scientific paradigm important for pharmacy education?Am J Pharm Educ2004685118 10.5688/aj6805118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hattie JThe relation between research productivity and teaching effectivenessJ High Educ2016735603641
   Google Scholar
• Williams KPlaying the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessmentRes Eval2020292191202 10.1093/reseval/rvaa001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes AM, Tonin FS, Buzzi MF, et al.Mapping pharmacy journals: a lexicographic analysisRes Social Adm Pharm2019151214641471 30683600 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen E, Mount J, Christensen SThe concept of social pharmacyChronic Illn20037811
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cardenas V, Rossing CV, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al.Pharmacy practice research—a call to actionRes Social Adm Pharm2020161116021608 32919918 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger FN, Lee HBFoundations of behavioral research19994BelmontWadsworth ISBN 978-0155078970
   Google Scholar
• Dreischulte T, van den Bemt B, Steurbaut SEuropean Society of Clinical Pharmacy definition of the term clinical pharmacy and its relationship to pharmaceutical care: a position paperIntl J Clinical Pharm.20224416 10.1007/s11096-022-01422-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scahill SL, Atif M, Babar ZUDefining pharmacy and its practice: a conceptual model for an international audienceIntegr Pharm Res Pract.20176121129 1:STN:280:DC%2BC1MvislOrtw%3D%3D 29354558 5774311 10.2147/IPRP.S124866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. Paris: OECD; 2015. ISBN: 978–926423901–2
   Google Scholar
• Clapham PPublish or perishBioscience200555390391 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0390:POP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desselle SP, Amin M, Aslani P, et al.Moving the needle-what does RSAP look for and what does it aim to do?Res Social Adm Pharm201915112 30482675 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos F, Mendes AM, Tonin FSConfusing terminology used in the abbreviation of pharmacy journal namesRes Social Adm Pharm202218834633465 35027305 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos F, Garcia-Cardenas V. The importance of using standardized terminology in titles and abstracts of pharmacy practice articles. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.017.
   Google Scholar
• Gernant SA, Bacci JL, Upton C, et al.Three opportunities for standardization: a literature review of the variation among pharmacists' patient care services terminologyRes Social Adm Pharm2020166766775 31836468 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mil JW, Henman MTerminology, the importance of definingInt J Clin Pharm2016383709713 27073076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure K, Paudyal V, Stewart DReviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?Int J Clin Pharm2016383685694 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XlvV2hu7g%3D 27048436 4909788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Saeedy D, Thomas D, Palaian SVisibility of evidence-based pharmacy on PubMed - Identity crisis?Res Social Adm Pharm201915111374 30879986 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann AAdvantages of a universal coding and classification system for drugs Implications of classification for medical subject headingsAm J Hosp Pharm19662328788 1:CAS:528:DyaF28XpslCrtw%3D%3D 5952045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, et al.Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacyAm J Health Syst Pharm2014712219651972 25349242 10.2146/ajhp140073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos F, Salgado TMStandardization of pharmacy practice terminology and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)Res Social Adm Pharm2021174819820 32763087 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, et al.Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINERes Social Adm Pharm2015115686695 25498253 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonin FS, Gmunder V, Bonetti AF, et al.Use of 'Pharmaceutical services' Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventionsExplor Res Clin Soc Pharm.20227100172 36082143 9445408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez RWComparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journalsAm J Health Syst Pharm2016738569575 27045069 10.2146/ajhp150319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin AN, Rackham DComparison of the time-to-indexing in PubMed between biomedical journals according to impact factor, discipline, and focusRes Social Adm Pharm2017132389393 27215603 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronick DAPeer review in 18th-century scientific journalismJAMA19902631013211322 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7ls1Kntg%3D%3D 2406469 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassirer JP, Campion EWPeer review Crude and understudied, but indispensableJAMA199427229697 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3osFektQ%3D%3D 8015140 10.1001/jama.1994.03520020022005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, et al.What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?J R Soc Med200810110507514 18840867 2586872 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar JC3rd, Patterson KThe need for a research agendaN Engl J Med198531210654657 3974641 10.1056/NEJM198503073121023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirschitzka J, Oeberst A, Göllner R, et al.Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary fieldScientometrics2017113210591092 10.1007/s11192-017-2516-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, et al.Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic reviewJAMA20022872127842786 12038911 10.1001/jama.287.21.2784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson T, Rudin M, BrodneyFolse S, et al.Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesCochrane Database Syst Rev20072MR000016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kovanis M, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, et al.Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publicationScientometrics20171131651671 29056795 5629248 10.1007/s11192-017-2375-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walbot VAre we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?J Biol20098324 19291274 2689429 10.1186/jbiol125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huisman J, Smits JDuration and quality of the peer review process: the author's perspectiveScientometrics20171131633650 29056794 5629227 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes AM, Tonin FS, Mainka FF, et al.Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: a comparative analysisPLoS ONE2021166 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhsVyitrrL 34185802 8241115 10.1371/journal.pone.0253713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos FPeer review and publication delayPharm Pract (Granada)20191711502 31015883 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aczel B, Szaszi B, Holcombe AOA billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer reviewRes Integr Peer Rev20216114 34776003 8591820 10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desselle SP, Chen AM, Amin M, et al.Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original researchRes Social Adm Pharm2020162261265 31101458 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos F, Salgado TM, Tonin FSHow many manuscripts should I peer review per year?Pharm Pract (Granada)20201811804 32161628 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato H, Marinho RTActa Medica Portuguesa and peer-review: quick and brutal!Acta Med Port2012255261262 23211193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos FAuthors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?Pharm Pract (Granada)20211912284 33520041 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desselle SP, Andrews B, Lui J, et al.The scholarly productivity and work environments of academic pharmacistsRes Social Adm Pharm2018148727735 28899607 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi-Sari H, Rezaee-Zavareh MSCitation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper useMed J Aust202021352389.e1 32808334 10.5694/mja2.50739
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu XL, Gai SS, Zhou JJournal impact factor: do the numerator and denominator need correction?PLoS ONE2016113 26977697 4792445 10.1371/journal.pone.0151414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill EShow me the dataJ Cell Biol2007179610911092 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVOgt7bF 18086910 2140038 10.1083/jcb.200711140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Llimos FBradford's law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculationsPharm Pract (Granada)2016143842 27785170 10.18549/PharmPract.2014.03.842
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paulus FM, Cruz N, Krach SThe impact factor fallacyFront Psychol201891487 30177900 6109637 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dougherty MR, Horne ZCitation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciencesR Soc Open Sci202298 35991336 9382220 10.1098/rsos.220334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie A, Seubert L, Clifford R, et al.Do randomised controlled trials relevant to pharmacy meet best practice standards for quality conduct and reporting? A systematic reviewInt J Pharm Pract2020283220232 31573121 10.1111/ijpp.12578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch JEAn index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProc Natl Acad Sci U S A2005102461656916572 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1Kgs7fL 16275915 1283832 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. 2022; https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/y41ks1wh/20220720-rra-agreement.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2022.
   Google Scholar
• van Mil JWF, Green JCitations and scienceInt J Clin Pharm2017395977979 29119357 10.1007/s11096-017-0539-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguet F, Salgado TM, Santopadre C, et al.Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)Int J Clin Pharm2017395989997 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhtlOgt7jL 28836131 10.1007/s11096-017-0527-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone T, Burke SAcademic librarians’ knowledge of bibliometrics and altmetricsEvid Based Libr Inf Pract2016113
   Google Scholar