A Holistic Approach to the Introduction of Automatic Speech Recognition Technology in Ground Combat Vehicles

REFERENCES

• Ainsworth, W. A. (1988). Optimising string length for spoken digit input with error correction. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 28, 573–581.
   Google Scholar
• Alleva, F., Huang, X. D., Hwang, M.-Y., & Jiang, L. (1998). Can continuous speech recognizers handle isolated speech? Speech Communication, 26, 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber, C. (1991). Speech technology in control moms. New York: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, C. (1993). Designing and evaluating interactive speech technology. In C. Baber & J. M. Noyes (Eds.), Interactive speech technology: Human factors issues in the application of speech input/output to computers (pp. 147–148). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, C., & Noyes, J. M. (1996). Automatic speech recognition in adverse environments. Human Factors, 38, 142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber, C., & Noyes, J. M. (2001). Speech control. In K. Baumann & B. Thomas (Eds.), User interface design for electronic appliances (pp. 190–208). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: Theory, research and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. M., Clothier, C. C., Woody, J. R., McKinney, E. H., & Brown, J. L. (1996). Crew resource management: A simulator study comparing fixed versus formed aircrews. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 67, 3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beard, R. L., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (1995). Enhancing transfer of training: Using role-play to foster teamwork in the cockpit. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. R., & Vosburgh, A. M. (1989). Evaluating the accuracy of a large vocabulary speech recognition system. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 296–300). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
   Google Scholar
• Brundage, W. J. (1986, March/April). Speech recognition for the automated warehouse. Speech Technology, pp. 74–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, T. W., & Norcio, A. F. (1997). User performance and acceptance of a speech-input interface in a health assessment task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 591–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entin, E. B., & Entin, E. E. (2000). Assessing team situation awareness in simulated military missions. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (1, pp. 73–76). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Flin, R., & Martin, L. (2001). Behavioral markers for crew resource management: A review of current practice. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. C., Maims, F. R., Jack, M. A., Love, S., Dutton, R. T., Nairn, I. A., et al. (1998). An experimental evaluation of preferences for data entry in automated telephone services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17, 82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foushee, H. C., Lauber, J. K., Baetge, M. M., & Acomb, D. B. (1986). Crew performance as a function of exposure to high density, short haul duty cycles ( NASA Technical Memorandum 88322). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Foushee, H. C., & Manos, K. L. (1981). Information transfer within the cockpit: problems in the intracockpit communications. In C. E. Billings & E. S. Cheaney (Eds.), Information transfer problems in the aviation system ( NASA Technical Paper No. 1875). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Frankish, C. R., & Noyes, J. M. (1989). Conversations with computers: Problems with feedback and error correction. In J. P. Tubach & J. J. Mariani (Eds.), Proceedings of European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 429–432). Edinburgh, Scotland: CEP Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Gallwitz, F., Niemann, H., & Noth, E. (1999). Speech recognition-state of the art, applications, and future prospects. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 41, 538–549.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E., Shankle, R., Murray, H., Travers, D., & Wheeler, T. (2000). Issues relating to automatic speech recognition and spatial auditory displays in high noise, stressful tank environments. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (3, pp. 754–757). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). New York: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, R. L., Foushee, H. C., Benson, R., & Russini, W. (1986). Cockpit resource management: Exploring the attitude-performance linkage. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 57(12), 1198–1200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, D. M., & Stewart, J. E. (1999). Use of virtual environments for the acquisition of spatial knowledge: Comparison among different visual displays. Military Psychology, 11, 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm, C., & Helander, M. G. (1997). Design issues for interfaces using voice input. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer,& P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 1043–1059). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Kanki, B. G., & Foushee, H. C. (1989). Communication as group process mediator of aircrew performance. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 56–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggatt, A. P. (1991). Assessing and improving the error correction dialogue for an automatic connected speech recogniser. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Birmingham, England.
   Google Scholar
• Leggatt, A. P., & Baber, C. (1992). Optimising the recognition of digits in automatic speech recognition through the use of minimal dialogue. In E. J. Lovesey (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics (pp. 545–550). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leggatt, A. P., & Noyes, J. M. (1997). Speech recognition technology: Implications for crew communication in armored fighting vehicles. In D. Harris (Ed.), Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Engineering Psychology & Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 451–457). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Leggatt, A. P., & Noyes, J. M. (2000). Navigation aids: Effects on crew workload and performance. Military Psychology, 12, 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Life, M. A., Long, J. B., & Lee, B. P. (1994). Providing human factors knowledge to non-specialists: A structured method for the evaluation of future speech interfaces. Ergonomics, 37, 1801–1842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M. (2001). Talking and writing—how natural in human-machine interaction? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 503–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M., & Frankish, C. R. (1994). Errors and error correction in automatic speech recognition systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1943–1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckham, J. (1986). Human factors in speech recognition. In G. Bristow (Ed.), Electronic speech recognition. London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Rhodenizer, L., & Bowers, C. A. (2000). The design and delivery of crew resource management training: Exploiting available resources. Human Factors, 42, 490–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Ruffell, H. P. (1979).A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions ( NASA Technical Memorandum 78482). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• van Breda, L., & Veltman, H. A. (1998). Perspective information in the cockpit as a target acquisition aid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. J. (1994). Military and government applications of human-machine communication by voice. In D. B. Roe & J. G. Wilpon (Eds.), Voice communication between humans and machines (pp. 357–370). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple task performance (pp. 3–34). Bristol, CT: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, E. L., Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (1993). Cockpit resource management. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, E. L., & Nagel, D. C. (1988). Human factors in aviation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar