69
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Evaluating Military Selection and Classification Systems in the Multiple Job Context

, &
Pages 169-186 | Published online: 17 Nov 2009

REFERENCES

  • Abbe, E. N. (1968). Statistical properties of allocation averages ( Memorandum No. 68-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Army Behavioral Science Research Laboratory.
  • Alderton, D. L., & Larson, G. E. (1994). Dimensions of ability: Diminishing returns? In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: New directions (pp. 137-144). Hinsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1946a). An approach to the problem of differential prediction. Psychometrika, 11, 139-154.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1946b). On the interpretation of the correlation coefficient as a measure of predictive efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 64-76.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1949). When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology, 2, 171-183.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1951). Increased efficiency of selection resulting from replacement of a single predictor with several differential predictors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 11, 173-196.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1954). A simple proof of a personnel classification theorem. Psychometrika, 19, 205-208.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1955). Least squares estimates and optimal classification. Psychometrika, 20, 249-252.
  • Brogden, H. E. (1959). Efficiency of classification as a function of number of jobs, percent rejected, and the validity and intercorrelation of job performance estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 19, 181-190.
  • Calfee, R. (1993). Paper, pencil, potential, and performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 6-7.
  • Carey, N. B. (1994). Computer predictors of mechanical job performance: Marine Corps findings. Military Psychology, 6, 1-30.
  • Earles, J. A., & Ree, M. J. (1992). The predictive ability of the ASVAB for training grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 721-725.
  • Gottfredson, L. S. (Ed.). (1986). The g factor in employment [Special issue]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3).
  • Horst, P. (1954). A technique for the development of a differential predictor battery. Psychological Monographs, 68(9, Whole No. 380).
  • Horst, P. (1955). A technique for the development of an absolute prediction battery. Psychological Monographs, 69(5, Whole No. 390).
  • Humphreys, L. G. (1979). The construct of general intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 105-120.
  • Hunter, J. E. (1983). The prediction of job performance in the military using ability composites: The dominance of general cognitive ability over specific aptitudes. Rockville, MD: Research Applications.
  • Hunter, J. E. (1984). The prediction of job performance in the civilian sector using the ASVAB. Rockville, MD: Research Applications.
  • Hunter, J. E. (1985). Differential validity across jobs in the military. Rockville, MD: Research Applications.
  • Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.
  • Hunter, J. E., Crosson, I. J., & Friedman, D. H. (1985). The validity of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery for civilian and military job performance. Rockville, MD: Research Applications.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1984). Test validity: g versus the specificity doctrine. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 7, 93-118.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1987). Psychometric g as a focus of concerted research effort. Intelligence, 11, 193-198.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1993). Test validity: g versus “tacit knowledge.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 9-10.
  • Johnson, C. D., & Zeidner, J. (1991). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 2. Classification efficiency. New York: Praeger.
  • Johnson, C. D., & Zeidner, J. (1995). Differential assignment theory sourcebook ( ARI Research Note No. 95-43). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Johnson, C. D., Zeidner, J., & Leaman, J. A. (1992). Improving classification efficiency by restructuring Army job families ( Tech. Rep. No. 947). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Johnson, C. D., Zeidner, J., & Scholarios, D. (1990). Improving the classification efficiency of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery through the use of alternative test selection indices ( IDA Paper No. P-2427). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
  • Johnson, C. D., Zeidner, J., & Scholarios, D. (1995). Developing new test selection and weight stabilization techniques for designing classification efficient composites ( ARI Research Note No. 95-42). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1993). Intelligence is not the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 5-6.
  • McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
  • Mitchell, K. J., & Hanser, L. M. (1984). The 1980 youth population norms: Enlistment and occupational classification standards in the Army ( Tech. Rep.). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Morales, M., & Ree, M. J. (1992, August). Intelligence predicts academic and work sample training performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Diego, CA.
  • Naylor, J. C., & Shine, L. C. (1965). A table for determining the increase in mean criterion score obtained by using a selection device. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 3, 33-42.
  • Nord, R., & Schmitz, E. (1991). Estimating performance and utility effects of alternative selection and classification policies. In J. Zeidner & C. D. Johnson (Eds.), The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 3. The gains of alternative policies (pp. 73-131). New York: Praeger.
  • Peterson, N. G., Hough, L. M., Dunnette, M. D., Rosse, R. L., Houston, J. S., Toquam, J. L., & Wing, H. (1990). Project A: Specification of the predictor domain and development of new selection/classification tests. Personnel Psychology, 43, 247-276.
  • Praediger, D. J. (1989). Ability differences across occupations: More than g. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 1-27.
  • Project A. (1990). Project A: The U.S. Army selection and classification project. Personnel Psychology, 43, 231-378.
  • Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1989). The differential validity of a differential aptitude test ( Rep. No. AFHRL-TR-89-59). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
  • Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
  • Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 86-89.
  • Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1993). g is to psychology what carbon is to chemistry: A reply to Sternberg and Wagner, McClelland, and Calfee. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 11-12.
  • Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1994). The ubiquitous predictiveness of g. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: New directions (pp. 127-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 5M-524.
  • Schmidt, F. L. (1994). The future of personnel selection in the U.S. Army. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: New directions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1983). Individual differences in productivity: An empirical test of estimates derived from studies of selection procedures utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 401-414.
  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Dunn, W. L. (1987). Potential utility increases from adding new tests to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) ( Contract No. Delivery Order 0053). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Larson, M. (1988). General cognitive ability versus general and specific aptitudes in the prediction of training performance: Some preliminary findings ( Contract No. Delivery Order 0053). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166-185.
  • Scholarios, D., Johnson, C. D., & Zeidner, J. (1994). Selecting predictors for maximizing the classification efficiency of a battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 412-424.
  • Statman, M. A. (1992, August). Developing optimal predictor equations for differential job assignment and vocational counseling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1993). The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 1-5.
  • Thorndike, R. L. (1986). The central role of general ability in prediction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 332-339.
  • U.S. Department of Defense. (1984). Armed Services Vocational Battery (ASVAB): Test manual. Chicago: U.S. Military Processing Entrance Command.
  • Welsh, J. R., Kucinkas, S. K., & Curran, L. T. (1990). Armed Services Vocational Battery (ASVAB): Integrative review of validity studies ( Rep. No. AFHRL—TR-90-22). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command.
  • Whetzel, D. L. (1991). Multidimensional screening: Comparison of a single-stage personnel selection/classification process with alternative strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
  • Wise, L. L., McHenry, J., & Campbell, J. P. (1990). Identifying optimal predictor composites and testing for generalizability across jobs and performance factors. Personnel Psychology, 43, 355-366.
  • Young, W. Y., Houston, J. S., Harris, J. H., Hoffman, G., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Large-scale predictor validation in Project A: Data collection procedures and data base preparation. Personnel Psychology, 43, 301-312.
  • Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1991a). Classification efficiency and systems design. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 81, 110-128.
  • Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1991b). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 1. Selection utility. New York: Praeger.
  • Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1991c). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 3. Estimating the gains of alternative policies. New York: Praeger.
  • Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1994). Is personnel classification a concept whose time has passed? In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: New directions (pp. 377-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.