The Impact of Chemical Protective Clothing on Military Operational Performance

REFERENCES

• Blewett, W. K., Arca, V. J., Jones, D. W., Redmond, D. P., Cantwell, D., & Wiley, P. (1995). A P2NBC2 report: Patient decontamination operations at a corps hospital ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–229). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC NO. AD–B198 365)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Arca, V. J., Stickel, G. A., Jones, D. W., & Rowan, W. A. (1990). P2NBC2 test of battalion aid station operations in NBC conditions ( CRDEC Rep. No. TR–148). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Chemical Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B141 610)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Jones, D. W., & Arca, V. J. (1991). P2NBC2 report: Helicopter air ambulance operations in a chemical environment ( CRDEC Rep. No. TR–255). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Chemical Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B154 125)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Ramos, G. A., Redmond, D. P., Cadarette, B. S., Hudgens, G. A., Fatkin, L. T., & McKiernan, K. (1994). P2NBC2 test: The effects of microclimate cooling on tactical performance ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–148). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B183 287)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Ramos, G. A., Redmond, D. P., & Fatkin, L. T. (1993). A P2NBC2 report: Mechanized smoke operations in MOPP-4 ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–122). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B177 600)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Redmond, D. P., Modrow, H. E., Fatkin, L. T., & Hudgens, G. A. (1994). P2NBC2 test of smoke/decontamination platoon operations ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–158). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B185 581)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Redmond, D. P., Popp, K., Harrah, D. M., Kirven, L., & Banderet, L. E. (1992). A P2NBC2 report: Detailed equipment decontamination operations ( CRDEC Rep. No. TR–330). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Chemical Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B171 813)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Redmond, D. P., Ramirez, T., & Harrah, D. M. (1993). A P2NBC2 report: Mobile subscriber equipment operations in a chemical environment ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–022). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B 172 969)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., Seitzinger, A. T., Redmond, D. P., Fatkin, L., & Banderet, L. E. (1993). A P2NBC2 report: Light division night decontamination operations ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–087). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B175 113)
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, W. K., von Fahnestock, F. M., Harris, J. L., Knoebel, E. R., O'Hern, M., Harris, L., Redmond, D. P., Fatkin, L. T., Rice, D. J., & Popp, K. (1995). A P2NBC2 report: Patient decontamination at mobile medical facilities ( ERDEC Rep. No. TR–255). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center. ( DTIC No. AD–B200 693)
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. G., Wick, C. H., Salvi, L., & Kash, H. M. (1990). Soldier performance of military operational tasks conducted while wearing chemical individual protective equipment (IPE): Data analysis in support of the revision of the U.S. Army field manual on NBC protection (FM 3–4) ( BRL Rep. No. TR–3155). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory. ( DTIC No. AD–A230 157)
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army. (1987). Letter of instruction for the assessment of the physiological and psychological effects of the NBC environment and sustained operations on systems in combat (P2NBC2). Washington, DC: U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army. (1992). NBC protection ( Field manual FM 3–4). Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, E. S., & Lombardi, J. J. (1986). Combined arms in a nuclear/chemical environment force development testing and experimentation, summary evaluation report phase I. Fort McClellan, AL: U.S. Army Chemical School.
   Google Scholar
• Headley, D. B., Brecht-Clark, J. M., Feng, T., & Whittenburg, J. A. (1988). The effects of the chemical defense ensemble and extended operations on performance and endurance of combat vehicle crews ( Tech. Rep. No. 811). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute. ( DTIC No. AD–B131 688)
   Google Scholar
• Headley, D. B., Brecht-Clark, J. M., & Whittenburg, J. A. (1989). Sustained operations of artillery crews in NBC and non-NBC environments. Military Medicine, 154, 511–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headley, D. B., & Cunningham, D. (1995). P2NBC2 special report: Annotated bibliography of P2NBC2 field studies, 1985–1994. Unpublished manuscript, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Hudgens, G. A. (1993, January). Evaluation of dropout casualties in P2NBC2 tests: Psychological factors. Paper presented at the meeting of the P2NBC2 Working Group, U.S. Army Chemical School, Fort McClellan, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Hudgens, G. A., Malkin, F. J., & Fatkin, L. T. (1992). Stress evaluation of a Special Forces Assessment and Evaluation course ( Tech. Memorandum No. 6–92). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory. ( DTIC No. AD–A256 793)
   Google Scholar
• Jarboe, R. L., & Troutman, M. D. (1990). NBC reconnaissance squad operations ( Rep. No.89–CEP–0600E). Fort Knox, KY: Test and Experimentation Command. ( DTIC No. AD–B141 791L)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. M., & Silver, J. D. (1992). Stinger team performance during engagement operations in a chemical environment: The effect of cuing ( Tech. Rep. No. 957). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute. ( DTIC No. AD–A254 524)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. M., & Silver, J. D. (1993). Stinger team performance during engagement operations in a chemical environment: The effect of experience ( Tech. Rep. No. 1638). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute. ( DTIC No. AD–A268 952)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. M., & Baker, J. D. (1974). Field testing: The delicate compromise. Human Factors, 16, 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, R. E., & Berndt, J. E. (1993). P2NBC2 Heat Strain Decision Aid user's guide ( Version 2.1). Joppa, MD: Science Applications International Corporation. ( DTIC No. AD–A266 072)
   Google Scholar
• Mojecki, J. A., Phillips, W. A., Draper, E. S., Hershberger, R., Studdard, W. C., & Williams, L. G. (1987). Combined arms in a nuclear/chemical environment (CANE), phase IIA summary evaluation report. Fort McClellan, AL: U.S. Army Chemical School.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, P. J., & Chaudoin, W. J. (1990). Tank combat service support and mobility test for physiological and psychological effects of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) and sustained operations on systems in combat (P2NBC2) concept evaluation program (CEP) ( Rep. No. 89–CEP–0600C). Fort Knox, KY: Test and Experimentation Command. ( DTIC No. AD– B145 138)
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, D. P. (1993, January). Evaluation of dropout casualties in P2NBC2 tests: Physiological factors. Paper presented at the meeting of the P2NBC2 Working Group, U.S. Army Chemical School, Fort McClellan, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Sheroke, R. M., & Klopcic, J. T. (1991). The Army unit resiliency analysis (AURA) computer simulation model: A brief overview ( BRL Memorandum Rep. No. 3892). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Ballistic Research Laboratory. ( DTIC No. AD–A232 951)
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, J. W., & Banderet, L. E. (1997/this issue). Psychological aspects of chemical defense and warfare. Military Psychology, 9, 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. L., & Orlansky, J. (1991). The effects of wearing protective chemical warfare combat clothing on human performance ( IDA Paper No. P–2433). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses. ( DTIC No. AD–A250 716)
   Google Scholar
• Taylor H. L., & Orlansky, J. (1993). The effects of wearing protective chemical warfare combat clothing on human performance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64(3, Sect. 2), A1–A41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Chemical School. (1989). Combined arms in a nuclear/chemical environment (CANE), phase IIB summary evaluation report. Fort McClellan, AL: U.S. Army Chemical School.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Chemical School. (1993). Summary evaluation report (SER), for combined arms in a nuclear/chemical environment (CANE) force development test & experimentation (FDTE): Close combat light (CCL). Fort McClellan, AL: U.S. Army Chemical School.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army TRADOC Analysis Command. (1992). JANUS(A) and Brigade/Battalion Simulation (BBS) Cost and Training Effectiveness Analysis (CTEA) ( TRAC–WSMR–CTEA Rep. No. 92–006). White Sands Missile Range, NM: TRADOC Analysis Command. ( DTIC No. AD–B186 373)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991). Chemical warfare: Soldiers inadequately equipped and trained to conduct chemical operations ( Rep. No. GAO/NSIAD–91–197). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Ofice.
   Google Scholar
• Zubal, O., Doss, N. W., Faughn, J. A., Kysor, K. P., Szlyk, P. C., Caretti, D. M., & Sils, I. V. (1993). Evaluation of the effect of protective clothing on the ability of self-propelled artillery (M109) crews to conduct and sustain high firing rate missions ( Rep. No. ARL–MR–98). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory. ( DTIC No. AD–B175 196)
   Google Scholar
• Zubal, O., Doss, N. W., & Thompson, J. L. (1996). Assessment of towed artillery (M198) crew performance in NBC protective clothing ( Rep. No. ARL–MR–309). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory. ( DTIC No. AD–B209 372)
   Google Scholar