Rethinking OODA: Toward a Modern Cognitive Framework of Command Decision Making

REFERENCES

• Alex, C. (2000). Process and procedure: The tactical decision-making process and decision point tactics. Unpublished master's thesis, Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
   Google Scholar
• Basar, T., & Cruz, J. B., Jr. (1984). Robust team-optimal and leader—follower policies for decision making in C3 Systems ( Final Report ONR Contract No. N00014-82-K-0469). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. R. (1987). A discourse on winning and losing [ Briefing slides]. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University Library. ( Document No. M-U 43947)
   Google Scholar
• Brewin, B. (1997, November 10). DOD lays groundwork for network-centric warfare. Federal Computer Week, 11, 54-58.
   Google Scholar
• Builder, C. H., Bankes, S. C., & Nordin, R. (1999). Command concepts: A theory derived from the practice of command and control. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Cebrowski, A. K., & Garstka, J. J. (1998, January). Network-centric warfare: Its origin and future. Proceedings Magazine, 124, 28-35.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, T. P. (1992). Command and control for war and peace. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. T., & Thompson, B. (1998). Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: A model and a training strategy. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 155-189). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. M., Leedom, D. K., Grynovicki, J. O., & Golden, M. G. (2000). Cognitive representativeness of battlespace complexity: Six fundamental variables of combat ( Final Rep. No. ARL-TN-155). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K. (2000). Bounded rationality and complex process coupling: Challenges for intelligence support to information warfare ( Strategic Research Report). Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. K. (2001). Effects-based operations: A grand challenge for the analytical community. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Department of National Defence. (1996). Land force: Command ( Report No. B-GL-300-003/FP-000). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of National Defence. (2002). Joint doctrine manual: CF operational planning process ( Report No. B-GJ-005-500/FP-00). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. F. (1976). On the psychology of military incompetence. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, R. (2002). Micromanagement and a commander's lack of operational vision: A case study of Operation Allied Force ( Report No. AD-a405 926). Newport, RI: Naval War College.
   Google Scholar
• Emilio, G. (2000). Promoting critical thinking in professional military education ( Research Report No. AU/ACSC/058/2000-04). Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air Command and Staff College.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. (1997). The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In G. Klein & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.) Naturalistic decision making (pp. 269-283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). Group dynamics and shared mental model development. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations. Applied in psychology (pp. 309-331). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, A. (1997). Representing information in mental models. In M. A. Conway (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory. Studies in cognition (pp. 149-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. A. (2002). Doomed to fail: America's blind faith in military technology ( Technical Report). Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
   Google Scholar
• Giffin, R. E. (2002). Superstitious rituals: Naïve inductivism in command and control doctrine: Its causes, consequences and cures. In Proceedings of the 7th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada: Department of Defence, Command and Control Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D. J., Linde, G., McGrath, K., Murphy, A. J., Murray, W., O'Leary, T., et al. (2001). New perspectives on effects-based operations: Annotated briefing ( IDA Document No. D-2583). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. W. (1990). Confirmation bias, problem-solving and cognitive models. In J.-P. Caverni & J.-M. Fabre (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 553-562). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. B. (1992). The directed telescope: A traditional element of effective command ( Combat Studies Institute Report No. 9). Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2000). Knowledgeacquisitionanduseinhigher-ordercognition. In K. Pawlik & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International handbook of psychology (pp. 167-190). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J., Sternberg, R. J., & Psotka, J. (2000). Tacit knowledge for military leadership: Seeking insight into the acquisition and use ofpractical knowledge ( Tech. Rep. No. ARI TR1105). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Higby, P. (2000). Economy of information: A necessary principle of war ( Final Report). Newport, RI: Naval War College, Joint Military Operations Department.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, J. A., Williams, W. M., Forsythe, G. B., Sweeney, P. J., Sternberg, R. J., McNally, J. A., et al. (1994). Tacit knowledge in military leadership: A review of the literature ( Final Report No. ARI TR-1017). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1997). Groupthink. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 163-176). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. (1999). Goal achievement and mental models in everyday decision making. In P. Juslin & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (pp. 23-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research (Vol. 5, pp. 47-92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (1997). The recognition-primed decision (RPD) model: Looking back, looking forward. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 285-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., & Wenzel, L. H. (1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In M. T. Brannick, C. W. Prince, & E. Salas (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, W. S. (1985). Maneuver warfare handbook. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Loffert, J. (2002). Mission analysis: Giving commanders what they need [ Monograph]. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Army Command and General Staff College.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1999). Mental models in theory and practice. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 223-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, F. (2000). The third wave metanoia: Breaking the command and control paradigm. Newport, RI: Naval War College.
   Google Scholar
• Peschl, M. F. (1992). The art of constructing knowledge in natural and artificial cognitive systems from the perspective of computational neuro-epistemology. Cognitive Systems, 3, 219-240.
   Google Scholar
• Pigeau, R., & McCann, C. (2000). Redefining command and control. In C. McCann & R. Pigeau (Eds.), The human in command: Exploring the modern military experience (pp. 163-184). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Plehn, M.. (2000). Control warfare: Inside the OODA loop. Unpublished master's thesis, Air University, School of Advanced Airpower Studies, Maxwell Air Force Base, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Radecki, C. M., & Jaccard, J. (1995). Perceptions of knowledge, actual knowledge, and information search behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 107-138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel, S., Morath, S. A., & McGonigle, T. P. (2001). Training critical thinking skills for battle command: ARI workshop proceedings ( Final Report No. 1777). Alexandra, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, I. (1993). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, I. (1997). The concept of indirect perception. In I. Rock (Ed.), Indirect perception (pp. 5-15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 1296-1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J., & Klein, G. (1999). A recognitional planning model. Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 1, 510-521.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, L. G., & Woods, D. D. (2000). Communication of intent in military command and control systems. In C. McCann & R. Pigeau (Eds.), The human in command: Exploring the modern military experience (pp. 279-291). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Sparling, B. (2002). Information theory as a foundation for military operations in the 21st century [ Monograph]. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Army Command and General Staff College.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, M. (2002). An introduction to command and control. Unpublished master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• U.K. Ministry of Defence. (2002). The strategic defence review ( Cm No. 3999). London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force. (1997). U.S. Air Force basic doctrine ( Air Force Doctrine Document No. 1). Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force. (1998). Information operations ( Air Force Doctrine Document No. 2-5). Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army. (1997). Staff organization and operations ( FM No. 101-5). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army. (2003). Mission command: Command and control of Army forces ( FM No. 6-0). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. (2000). Joint vision 2020. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Navy. (1995). Naval command and control ( NDP No. 6). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Marine Corps. (1997). MCDP1: Warfighting ( PCN No. 142 000 006 00). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, M. (1979). Command. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, S. (2002). Reducing the fog of war: Linking tactical war gaming to critical thinking [ Monograph]. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Army Command and General Staff College.
   Google Scholar
• Wrangham, R. (1999). Is military incompetence adaptive? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 3-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar