The Social Shaping of the Scholarly Communication System in Mongolia

References

• Arunachalam Subbiah (2003). Information for Research in Developing Countries—Information Technology, a Friend or Foe? International Information and Library Review 35, no. 2: 133–47.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (1992). Mongolia, a Centrally Planned Economy in Transition. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (2009). Private Sector Assessment for Mongolia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Auty Richard (1993). Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Charles W., Jr. (2013). Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography (http://www.digital-scholarship.org/tsp/transforming.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Benner Mats , Liu Li , and Schwaag Serger Sylvia (2012). Head in the Clouds and Feet on the Ground. Science and Public Policy 39: 258–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat Mohammad (2009). Open Access Publishing in Indian Premier Research Institutions. Information Research 14, no. 3: paper 409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker Wiebe , Hughs Thomas , and Pinch Trevor (1989). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block Fred , and Keller Matthew R. (2011). State of Innovation: US Government Technology Policies, 1969–2008. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Bo-Christer Bjork (2004). Open Access to Scientific Publications—an Analysis of the Barriers to Change. Information Research 9, no. 2: paper 170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlin Ingemar (2004). Commercialization Regimes in Competition: The Current Transition in Scholarly Communication Seen through the Lens of the Sociology of Technology. Social Studies of Science 34, no. 3: 365–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumarafi Behdja (2010). Electronic Resources at the University of Sharjah Medical Library: An Investigation of Students' Information-Seeking Behavior. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 29, no. 4: 349–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun D. (2008). Organising the Political Coordination of Knowledge and Innovation Policies. Science and Public Policy 35: 227–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chan L. , and Costa S. (2005). Participation in the Global Knowledge Commons: Challenges and Opportunities for Research Dissemination in Developing Countries. New Library World 106, no. 3/4: 141–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Chen Chi (2006). Business Models for Open Access Journals Publishing. Online Information Review 30, no. 6: 699–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockerill Matthew (2006). The Economics of Open Access Publishing. Information Services and Use 26, no. 2: 151–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dolgin, Elie (2009). Online Access = More Citations. Scientist 19 February (http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55437/).
   Google Scholar
• Fang Conghui , and Zhu Ziaochun (2006). The Open Access Movement in China. Interlending and Document Summary 34, no. 4: 186–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez Leila (2006). Open Access Initiatives in India—an Evaluation. Partnership: Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 1, no. 1 (https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/110#.Unv77-J36vh).
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, Jeffrey A. (2010). The Natural Resource Curse: A Survey. Working paper 15836, National Bureau of Economic Research (http://www.nber.org/papers/w15836).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman Chris (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman Chris (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, no. 1: 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman Thomas (2005). The World Is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S. B. , and Das Anup Kumar (2007). Open Access and Institutional Repositories—a Developing Country Perspective: A Case Study of India. IFLA Journal 37, no. 3: 229–50.
   Google Scholar
• Graham L. R. , and Dezhina I. (2008). Science in the New Russia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gul Sumeer , Shah Tariq , and Baghwan Tariq (2010). Culture of Open Access in the University of Kashmir: A Researcher's Viewpoint. Aslib Proceedings 62, no. 2: 210–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider J. (2007). Of the Rich and the Poor and Other Curious Minds: On Open Access and “Development.” Aslib Proceedings 59, no. 4/5: 449–61.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad Stevan , Brody Tim , Vallieres Francois , Carr Leo , Hitchcock Steve , Gingras Yves , Oppenheim Charles , Stamerjohanns Heinrich , and Hilf Eberhard (2004). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. Serials Review 30, no. 4: 310–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshon, Arnold (2002). EIFL Electronic Resource Statistics. Final report, Nelinet Consulting Solutions. Unpublished manuscript in possession of Thomas Scheiding.
   Google Scholar
• Igun Stella (2005). Implications for Electronic Publishing in Libraries and Information Centers in Africa. Electronic Library 23, no. 1: 82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson Catherine , and Yadamsuren Borchuluun (2010). Libraries in Transition: How Librarians in Mongolia Are Re-visioning the Role of Libraries in the New Democracy, a Case Study. International Information and Library Review 42, no. 1: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsop Barbara , and Chan Leslie (2005). Transforming Access to Research Literature for Developing Countries. Serials Review 31, no. 4: 246–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling Rob , and McKim Geoffrey (2000). Not Just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media in Supporting Scientific Communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, no. 14: 1306–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling Rob , McKim Geoffrey , and King Adam (2003). A Bit More to IT: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, no. 1: 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy M. (2008). Open Access, Open Source and Digital Libraries: A Current Trend in University Libraries around the World. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 42, no. 1: 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. Ä. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Chunrong , Jingfen Wang , and Zhinong Zhou (2010). Regional Consortia for E-Resources: A Case Study of Deals in the South China Region. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 44, no. 4: 328–41.
   Google Scholar
• Manaf Zuraidah (2006). The State of Digitisation Initiatives by Cultural Institutional in Malaysia. Library Review 56, no. 1: 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall Richard , Nixson Frederick , and Walters Bernard (2007). Privatization and Regulation in an Asian Transitional Economy: The Case of Mongolia. Public Administration and Development 27, no. 5: 439–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science (2007). Science and Technology Master Plan of Mongolia, 2007–2020. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: UN Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands Ian , and Nichols Dave (2006). The Changing Scholarly Communication Landscape: An International Survey of Senior Researchers. Learned Publishing 19: 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver Keith (2002). Pressing the “Send” Key—Preferential Journal Access in Developing Countries. Learned Publishing 15, no. 2: 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suber, Peter (2007). Comment to “Publishers Doubt the OA Impact Advantage.” Open Access News 18 May (http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/2007_05_13_fosblogarchive.html).
   Google Scholar
• Swan, Alma (2010). The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date. Technical report, Scholarly of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton (http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/).
   Google Scholar
• Willinsky John (2003). The Nine Flavors of Open Access Scholarly Publishing. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 49, no. 3: 263–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Bank (2011). Mongolia Quarterly Economic Update. April (http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2011/05/05/mongolia-quarterly-economic-update-april-2011).
   Google Scholar
• Yadamsuren, Borchuluun (2007). Report of the Study on Information Needs of Mongolian Scholars. Working paper, American Center for Mongolian Studies (http://www.mongoliacenter.org/docs/library/information.needs.mongolia.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Ylotis K. (2005). The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications. Information Technology and Libraries 24, no. 4: 157–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar