Sipping Science: The Interpretative Flexibility of Science Cafés in Denmark and Japan

References

• Balling Gert , and Schuler Emmanuelle (2002). Videnskabscaféen: Videnskab, kunst og kultur (The Science Café: Science, Art, and Culture). Højbjerg, Denmark: Hovedland.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer Martin W. Shukla Rajesh Allum Nick , eds. (2012). The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science across the Globe. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi Massimiano , and Neresini Federico (2008). Science and Public Participation. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hackett Edward J. Amsterdamska Olga Lynch Michael Wajcman Judy , 449–72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon Michel , Lacoumes Pierre , and Barthe Yannik (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelfranchi Yurij (2004). Science Communication around the World: Eyes on Brazil. Journal of Science Communication 3, no. 4 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/03/04/F030401/).
   Google Scholar
• Chen Dung-Seng , and Wu Ghia-Ling (2007). Introduction: Public Participation in Science and Technology in East Asia. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1, no. 1: 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Collins Harry M. , and Evans Robert (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Science and Technology Policy (2006). Science and Technology Basic Plan (FY2006–FY2010) (http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/, accessed 16 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dallas Duncan (1999). The Cafe Scientifique. Nature 399, no. 120: 120.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas Duncan (2006). Cafe Scientifique—Deja Vu. Cell 126, no. 2: 227–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Board of Technology (2006). The Consensus Conference (http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3?article = 468&toppic = kategori12&language = uk, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Danish Board of Technology Foundation (2013). Methods (http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3?survey = 16&language = uk, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Deng Chung-Yeh , and Wu Chia-Ling (2010). An Innovative Participatory Method for Newly Democratic Societies: The “Civic Groups Forum” on National Health Insurance Reforms in Taiwan. Social Science and Medicine 70, no. 6: 896–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einsiedel Edna F. (2008). Public Participation and Dialogue. In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by Bucchi Massimiano and Trench Brian , 173–84. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel Edna F. , Jelsøe Erling , and Breck Thomas (2001). Publics at the Technology Table: The Consensus Conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Understanding of Science 10, no. 1: 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelista Rafael , and Kanashiro Marta Mourão (2004). Science, Communication, and Society in Brazil, the Narrative of Deficit. Journal of Science Communication 3, no. 4 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/03/04/F030403/).
   Google Scholar
• Grand, Ann (2007). Cafe Scientifique Organisers' Conference 2007 (http://www.cafescientifique.org/attachments/article/263/conference%20report.pdf, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Greco Pietro (2004). Towards a “Mediterranean Model” of Science Communication. Journal of Science Communication 3, no. 3 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/03/03/F030304/).
   Google Scholar
• Higashijima Jin , Takahashi Kae , and Kato Kazuto (2009). Mouse Model: What Do Japanese Life Sciences Researchers Mean by This Term? Journal of Science Communication 8, no. 1 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/08/01/Jcom0801%282009%29A01).
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones Tom , Walls John , Rowe Gene , Pidgeon Nick , Poortinga Wouter , and O'Riordan Tim (2006). On Evaluating the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain. New Genetics and Society 25, no. 3: 265–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst Maja (2008). In Search of Dialogue: Staging Science Communication in Consensus Conferences. In Communicating Science in Social Contexts, edited by Cheng Donghon Claessens Michel Gascoigne Toss Metcalfe Jenni Schiele Bernard Shi Shunke , 259–74. Berlin: Springer Science+ Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Horst Maja , and Irwin Alan (2010). Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing, and False Consensusness. Social Studies of Science 40, no. 1: 105–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst Maja , and Michael Mike (2011). On the Shoulders of Idiots: Re-thinking Science Communication as “Event.” Science as Culture 20, no. 3: 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin Alan (2006). The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science 36, no. 2: 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin Alan , Jensen Torben E. , and Jones Kevin E. (2013). The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice. Social Studies of Science 43, no. 1: 118–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joss Simon (1998). Danish Consensus Conferences as a Model of Participatory Technology Assessment: An Impact Study of Consensus Conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish Public Debate. Science and Public Policy 25, no. 1: 2–22.
   Google Scholar
• Juraku Kohta , Suzuki Tatsujiro , and Sakura Osamu (2007). Social Decision-Making Processes in Local Contexts: An STS Case Study on Nuclear Power Plant Siting in Japan. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1, no. 1: 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr Anne , Cunningham-Burley Sarah , and Tutton Richard (2007). Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue. Social Studies of Science 37, no. 3: 385–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Shinichi, Thomas E. Hope, Minako Kusafuka, and Akiko Morozumi (2004). 科学技術と社会の楽しい関係: イギリス編 (Café Scientifique: A New “Sexy” Interface between Science and Society). CTS-WP-2004-02.Working paper, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Tadashi (2007). トランス・サイエンスの時代―科学技術と社会をつなぐ (The Age of Trans-Science: Bridging Science, Technology, and Society). Tokyo: NTT.
   Google Scholar
• Kragh Helge , Kjærgaard Peter C. , Nielsen Henry , and Nielsen Kristian H. (2008). Science in Denmark: A Thousand-Year History. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach Melissa Scoones Ian Wynne Brian , eds. (2005). Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, Kentaro, and Kazuto Kato (2008). Current Situation and Future Challenges for Science Cafés in Japan (unpublished paper, available from the authors).
   Google Scholar
• Mazzonetto Marzia (2005). Science Communication in India: Current Situation, History, and Future Developments. Journal of Science Communication 4, no. 1 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/04/01/F040101/).
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Carter Bloch, Lise Degn, Tine Ravn, and Mathias W. Nielsen (2012). Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS): Final Synthesis Report (http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/monitoring-policy-research-activities-on-sis_en.pdf, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Sports, Science, and Technology (2004). White Paper on Science and Technology 2004. Science and Technology in the Future (http://www.mext.go.jp/english/whitepaper/1302285.htm, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura Masaki (2010). STS in Japan in Light of the Science Café Movement. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 4, no. 1: 145–51.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen Kristian H. (2005). Between Understanding and Appreciation: Current Science Communication in Denmark. Journal of Science Communication 4, no. 4 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/04/04/A040402/).
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa Mariko (2005). Citizen Deliberations on Science and Technology and Their Social Environments: Case Study on the Japanese Consensus Conference on GM Foods. Science and Public Policy 6, no. 6: 479–89.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa Mariko , and Renn Ortwin (2006). Responding to Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan. Journal of Risk Research 9, no. 1: 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton Michael , and Nohara Kayoko (2009). Science Cafés: Cross-Cultural Adaption and Educational Applications. Journal of Science Communication 8, no. 4 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/08/04/Jcom0804(2009)A01/).
   Google Scholar
• Pitrelli Nico (2005). The New “Chinese Dream” Regards Science Communication. Journal of Science Communication 4, no. 2 (http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/04/02/F040201/).
   Google Scholar
• Riise Jan (2008). Bringing Science to the Public. In Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, edited by Cheng Donghong Claessens Michel Gascoigne Toss Metcalfe Jenni Schiele Bernard Shi Shunke , 301–9. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Tænketanken for forståelse for forskning (Think Tank for Public Understanding of Science) (2004). Forsk og fortæl (Do Your Research and Tell People about It). Copenhagen: Ministry of Science (http://ufm.dk/publikationer/2004/forsk-og-fortael, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (1998). The Role of Science and Technology in Society and Governance: Toward a New Contract between Science and Society. Science for the Twenty-First Century: A New Commitment (http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/meetings/eur_alberta_98_e.htm, accessed 22 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wakamatsu Yukio (1999). A Citizens' Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan. AI and Society 13, nos. 1–2: 22–43.
   Google Scholar