References
- Carmen I. (2004). Politics in the laboratory. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
- Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
- Jennings B. (2003). The liberalism of life: Bioethics in the face of biopower. Raritan, 22(4), 132–147.
- López J. J. Robertson A. (2007). Ethics or politics? The emergence of ELSI discourse in Canada. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 44(2), 201–218.
- Macnaghten P. Kearnes M. Wynne B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27(2), 1–24.
- McCain L. (2002). Informing technology policy decisions: the US Human Genome Project's ethical, legal, and social implications programs as a critical case. Technology in Society, 24(1–2), 111–132.
- National Human Genome Research Institute (2004). ELSI planning and evaluation history: The planning and evaluation history of the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) Research Program. http://www.genome.gov/10001754. Accessed 21 September 2009.
- Rei Wenmay (2003). In search of an institutional paradigm for genetic technology: Integrated institutional capacity—building, dynamic decision-making mechanism, and deliberative normative foundations 2002–2004. National Science Council Project Proposal.
- Sismondo S. (2008). Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In Hackett E. J. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 13–31). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- The Executive Yuan (2009) The national science and technology development plan of 2009–2012, Measure 4313.
- UNESCO (1997). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights.
- Wynne B. (2005). Risk as globalizing ‘Democratic’ Discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In Leach M. Scoones I. Wynne B. (Eds.), Science and citizens: globalization & the challenge of engagement (pp. 66–82). London: Zed Books.