Cultivar-To-Wild Population Introgression in Cucurbita pepo subsp. ovifera

References

• Arias, D. M., and Rieseberg, L. H., 1994. Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 89 (1994), pp. 655–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriola, P. E., and Ellstrand, N. C., 1996. Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. Am. J. bot. 83 (1996), pp. 1153–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, L. H., 1943. Species of Cucurbita, Gentes Herbarium 6 (1943), pp. 267–322.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, D., and Ellstrand, N. C., 1999. Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta), Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 (1999), pp. 1120–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S-M., Decker-Walters, D. S., and Staub, J. E., 2003. Genetic relationships within the Cucurbitaceae as assessed by ccSSR marker and sequence analysis, Can. J. Bot. 81 (2003), pp. 814–832.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, C. W., and Smith, B. D., 1993. New perspectives on a wild gourd in eastern North America, J. Ethnobio. 13 (1993), pp. 17–54.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. S., 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae), Econ. Bot. 42 (1988), pp. 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker-Walters, D. S., Staub, J. E., Chung, S.-M., Nakata, E., and Quemada, H. D., 2002. Diversity in free-living populations of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA, Syst. Bot. 27 (2002), pp. 19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker-Walters, D. S., Walters, T. W., Cowan, C. W., and Smith, B. D., 1993. Isozymic characterization of wild populations of Cucurbita pepo, Journal of Ethnobio. 13 (1993), pp. 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N. C., Prentice, H. C., and Hancock, J. F., 1999. Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 (1999), pp. 539–563.
   Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N. C., 2003a. Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 358 (2003a), pp. 1163–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N. C., 2003b. Dangerous liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. Baltimore, USA: The John Hopkins University Press; 2003b. p. 244.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, M. R., 1931. Vegetal remains of the Ozark Bluff-Dweller culture, Papers of the Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts, & Letters 14 (1931), pp. 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A., 1850. Plantae Lindheimerianae, Boston J. Natural Hist. 6 (1850), pp. 193–194.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagnuolo, R., Savova-Bianchi, D., and Felber, F., 2001. Gene flow from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrical Host.), as revealed by RAPD and microsatellite markers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 103 (2001), pp. 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, P., 1908. Nouvelles rescherches sur la distribution florale, Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44 (1908), pp. 223–270.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, M., King, F. B., and Robinson, C. K., 1980. Cucurbits from Phillips Spring: new evidence and interpretations, Amer. Antiquity 45 (1980), pp. 806–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, F. B., and McMillan, R. B., 1975. Plant remains from a woodland storage pit, Boney Spring, Missouri, Plains Anthropologist 20 (1975), pp. 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, K. J., and Wilson, H. D., 1988. Interspecific gene flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo, Amer. J. Bot. 75 (1988), pp. 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnaeus, C., 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: Impensis Laurentii Salvii; 1753.
   Google Scholar
• Linnaeus, C., 1767. Mantissa plantarum. Stockholm: Impensis Laurentii Salvii; 1767.
   Google Scholar
• Messeguer, J., 2003. Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 73 (2003), pp. 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rholf, F. J., 1997. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.0. Setauket, NY.: Exeter Software; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., Cowan, C., and Hoffman, M., 1992. "Is it an indigene or a foreigner?". In: Smith, B. D., ed. In Rivers of change: essays on the origins of agriculture in eastern North America. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1992. pp. 67–100.
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, P. H.A., and Sokal, R R, 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, CA.. 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. J., and Snow, A. A., 2001. Fecundity of transgenic wild-crop hybrids of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae): implications for crop-to-wild gene flow, Heredity 86 (2001), pp. 694–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner, D. M., Tivang, J., Nienhuis, J., Miller, J. T., Douches, D. S., and Contreras-, M. A., 1996. Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus potatoe), Theor. Appl. Genet. 92 (1996), pp. 532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapley, W. T., Enzie, W. D., and van Eseltine, G. P., 1937. The Vegetables of New York, Vol. 1, Part 4. The Cucurbits; 1937. p. 131.
   Google Scholar
• Willdenow, C. L., 1805. Species plantarum, 4th ed., Vol. 4. Berlin: G.C. Nauk; 1805.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M., 1994. Community response to transgenic plant release: predictions from British experience of invasive plants and feral crop plants, Mol. Ecol. 3 (1994), pp. 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. D., 1990. Gene flow in squash species, Bioscience. 40 (1990), pp. 449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. D., Doebley, J., and Duvall, M., 1992. Chloroplast DNA diversity among wild and cultivated members of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae), Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 (1992), pp. 859–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar