Peer Assessment in Hospitality Education

References

• Adams , C. and King , K. 1994 . Towards a framework for student self-assessment . Innovations in Education and Training International , 32 ( 4 ) : 336 – 343 .
   Google Scholar
• Adams , C. , Thomas , R. and King , K. 2000 . Business student's ranking of reasons for assessment: Gender differences . Innovations in Education and Training International , 37 ( 3 ) : 234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon , D. R. , Stewart , K. A. and Belle , S. 1998 . Exploring predictors of student team project performance . Journal of Marketing Education , 20 ( 1 ) : 63 – 71 .
   Google Scholar
• Bacon , D. R. , Stewart , K. A. and Silver , W. S. 1999 . Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference . Journal of Management Education , 23 ( 5 ) : 467 – 488 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 1981 . Developing greater student autonomy in student learning , London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 1986 . Implementing student self assessment (Green Guide No. 5) , Sydney : HERDSA .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 1989 . The role of self assessment in student grading . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 14 : 20 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. , Cohen , R. and Sampson , J. 1999 . Peer learning assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 24 ( 4 ) : 413 – 426 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. and Holmes , H. 1995 . “ Peer and self marking in a large technical subject ” . In Enhancing learning through self assessment Edited by: Boud , D. 63 – 78 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , W. and Cavaye , G. 1980 . Peer assessment by fifth year students of surgery . Assessment in Higher Education , 5 ( 3 ) : 273 – 278 .
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun , J. , Tenhaken , J. and Woolliscroft , J. 1990 . Medical students' development of self and peer assessment skills: a longitudinal study . Teaching and Learning in Medicine , 2 : 25 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Cheng , W. and Warren , M. 1997 . Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise . Studies in Higher Education , 22 ( 2 ) : 233 – 239 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng , W. and Warren , M. 2000 . Making adifference: using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project . Teaching in Higher Education , 5 ( 2 ) : 243 – 255 .
   Google Scholar
• Dochy , F. , Segers , M. and Sluijsmans , D. 1999 . The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review . Studies in Higher Education , 24 ( 3 ) : 331 – 350 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 1986 . Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 11 : 146 – 166 .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 1989 . Module three assessment. Certificate in teaching in higher education by open learning , Oxford : The Oxford Centre for Staff Development .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. and Jenkins , A. 1992 . Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources , London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Gosenpud , J. J. and Washbush , J. B. 1991 . “ Predicting simulation performance: differences between individuals and groups ” . In Developments in business simulations and experiential exercises Edited by: Wheatley , W. J. and Gosenpud , J. 44 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Henbest , R. and Fehrsen , M. 1985 . Preliminary study at the medical university of Southern Africa on student self assessment as a means of evaluation . Journal of Medical Education , 60 : 66 – 67 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes , I. and Large , B. 1993 . Assessment of students' oral communication skills by staff and peer groups . The New Academic , Summer
   Google Scholar
• Ingham , A. G. , Levinger , G. , Graves , J. and Peckham , V. 1974 . The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 10 : 371 – 384 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe , E. D. and Nebenzahl , I. D. 1990 . Group interaction and business game performance . Simulation and Gaming , 21 ( 2 ) : 133 – 146 .
   Google Scholar
• Jalajas , D. S. and Sutton , R. I. 1984–1985 . Feuds in student groups, coping with whin-ers, martyrs, saboteurs, bullies and deadbeats . Organizational Teaching Review , 9 ( 4 ) : 217 – 227 .
   Google Scholar
• Kwan , K. and Leung , R. 1996 . Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 ( 3 ) : 205 – 214 .
   Google Scholar
• Latane , B. , Williams , K. and Harkins , S. 1979 . Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 ( 6 ) : 822 – 832 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie , L. 2000 . Occupational therapy students as peer assessors in viva examinations . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 ( 2 ) : 135 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• Mallinger , M. 1998 . Maintaining control in the classroom by giving up control . Journal of Management Education , 22 ( 4 ) : 427 – 483 .
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides , G. and Simkin , M. G. 1991 . Evaluating student papers: The case for peer review . Journal of Education for Business , 67 : 80 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Mello , J. A. 1993 . Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings . Journal of Management Education , 17 ( 2 ) : 253 – 259 .
   Google Scholar
• Moerkerke , G. 1996 . Assessment for Flexible Learning , Utrecht : Lemma .
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield , K. and MacAlpine , J. 1995 . Peer and self assessment at tertiary level: an experiential report . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 20 ( 1 ) : 125 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Paquet , M. R. and Marchais , J. E. 1998 . Students' acceptance of peer assessment . Education for Health , 11 ( 1 ) : 25
   Google Scholar
• Pond , K. , Ui-Hao , R. and Wade , W. 1995 . Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment . Innovations in Education and Training International , 32 : 314 – 323 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivan , A. 2000 . The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach . Assessment in Education , 7 ( 2 ) : 193 – 213 .
   Google Scholar
• Stefani , L. A.J. 1994 . Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 ( 1 ) : 69 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong , J. T. and Anderson , R. E. 1990 . Free riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data . Journal of Marketing Education , 12 : 61 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• Topping , K. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 ( 3 ) : 249 – 276 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb , N. M. 1995 . Group collaboration in assessment : Multiple objectives, processes and outcomes . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 17 ( 2 ) : 239 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks , B. and Stribling , J. 1991 . The use of peer reviews for evaluation of individual student performance in group projects . SCHOLE, A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education , 6 : 46 – 56 .
   Google Scholar
• Winger-Haunty , S. 1990 . Peer assessment instrument , Menomonie : University of Wisconsin-Stout .
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe , J. and Box , T. M. 1988 . Team cohesion effects on business game performance . Simulation and Games , 19 ( 1 ) : 82 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar