A Model of Health Environmental Integration

REFERENCES

• Horowitz HW. Poetry on rounds: A model for the integration of humanities into resi-dency training. Lancet. 1996;347:447–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-lev-el Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand I Rehabil Med. 1994;26:115–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clini-cian. I Psychiatric Res. 1975;121:89–198.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz A, Poirier O, Moulin T, Chedru F, Cambien F, Amarenco P. Association between the glu298Asp polymorphism in the endothelial constrictive nitric oxide synthase gene and brain infarction. The GENIC Investigators. Stroke. 2000;31:1634–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voetsch B, Damasceno BP, Camargo EC, et al. Inherited thrombophilia as a risk factor for the development of ischemic stroke in young adults. Thrombosis Homeostasis. 2000;83:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder R. Implication of mind-body theo-ry for integration in psychiatry. Psychiatry. 1995;58:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel T. What is the mind-body problem? Ciba Found Symp. 1993;174:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland PS. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman A. Organic unity theory: The mind-body problem revisited. Am Psychiatry. 1991;148:553–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham J. The Rationalists. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am I Psychiatry. 1980;137:535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MadeII G. Mind and Materialism. Edinburgh, Great Britain: Edinburgh University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Society for the ICIDH. 1CIDH and Environmental Factors International Network. Lac St-Charles (Quebec), Canada: Author; 1997:9.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Cloutier R, Bergeron H, Cote J, Cote M, St. Michael G. Revision of the Quebec Classification: Handicap Creation Process. Lac St-Charles, Quebec: International Network on the Handicap Creation Process; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1CIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 draft, Full Version. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Marino RJ, Shea JA, Stineman MG. The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument: Reliability and validity of a measure of func-tional limitation in tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;37:717–725.
   Google Scholar
• Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarloy AR, eds. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991:309–327.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1993. NIH Publication No. 93–3509.
   Google Scholar
• Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. Am Med Assoc. 1994;272:619–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG. The spheres of self-fulfill-ment: A multidimensional approach to the assessment of assistive technology out-comes. In: Gray DB, Quatrano LA, Lieberman MI, eds. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1998:51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Strasser DC. Team process and effectiveness: Patients, families, and staff characteristics. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;4: 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG. Defining the population, treatments, and outcomes of interest: Reconciling the rules of biology with mean-ingfulness. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80: 147–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineiro R, Pendlebury ST Smith S, et al. Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke segmentation of functional motor pathways. Stroke. 2000;31:672–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Vikingstad EM, George KP, Johnson AF, Welch KM. Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI. Stroke. 1999;30: 2331–2340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffee MW. Studies of illness in the aged - the index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. I Am Med Assoc. 1963;185: 914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Jette AM, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Impairment-specific dimensions within the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:636–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson RG, Murata Y, Shimoda K. Dimensions of social impairment and their effect on depression and recovery following stroke. Int Psychogeriatrics. 1999;11:375–384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Naylor CD, Juniper E, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: How to use articles about health-related quality of life. I Am Med Assoc. 1997;277:1232–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletta EM, Murphy JB. Physical and func-tional assessment of the elderly stroke patient. Am Earn Physician. 1994;49: 1777–1785.
   Google Scholar
• Tepperman PS, Soric R, Devlin HT. Stroke rehabilitation. A problem-oriented approach. Postgraduate Medicine. 1986;80:158–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek MA, Fuhrer Mi. Independence among people with disabilities: I. A heuristic model. Rehabil Counseling Bull. 1992;36:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• lezonni LI. When walking fails. I Am Med Assoc. 1996;276:1609-1613.
   Google Scholar
• Wainapel SF. Dickens and Disability. Disability Rehabil. 1996;18:629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G. Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:435–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden L, Richards L, Cole J, Baily O. ILRU Source Book: A Technical Assistance Manual on Independent Living. Houston, TX: The International Institute for Rehabilitation and Research; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Grant JS. Social problem-solving partner-ships with family caregivers. Rehabil Nurs. 1999;24:254–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey A. A renegade in and out of scrubs. The Philadelphia Inquirer. April 15, 1998: D1, D7.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D. Health care reform — past and future. New Eng I Med. 1995;332:465–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar