REFERENCES
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2004 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2004
- Prevalence of disabilities and associated health con-ditions among adults in the United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(7):120–125.
- Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1987:137–147.
- Mahoney Ii, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. MD State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
- Granger C, Ottenbacher K, Baker J, Sehgal A. Reliability of a brief outpatient functional outcome assessment measure. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 74:469–475.
- Duncan P, Lai S, Bode R, Perera S, DeRosa J, Investigators GA. Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology. 2003; 60:291–296.
- Ware JS, Kisinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.
- Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC, eds. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987:6–18.
- Morris IN, Murphy K, Nonemaker S. Long-Term Resident Care Assessment User's Manual. Version 2.0. Washington, DC: American Health Care Association; 1995.
- Shaughnessy P, Crisler K, Schlenker R. Medicare's Oasis: Standardized Outcome and Assessment Information Set for Home Health Care: Oasis-B. Denver, CO: Center for Health Services and Policy Research; 1997.
- Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai S, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster L. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;10:2131–2140.
- Holbrook M, Skilbeck C. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12:166–170.
- Whiting S, Lincoln N. An ADL assessment for stroke patients. Br] Occup Ther. 1980;43:44–46.
- Nouni F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:301–305.
- National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Classifying and Reporting Functional Status. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001:1–17.
- Wainer H, Dorans N, Flaugher R. Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1990.
- Sands WA, Waters BK, McBride JR. Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Inquiry to Operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997.
- Dijkers M. A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;84(3):384–393.
- Ware J. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;84(4 suppl 2):543–51.
- Haley S, Andres P, Kosinski M, Ni R Scoring com-parability of short-forms and computerized adap-tive testing: an illustration with the activity measure for post-acute care (AM-PAC). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
- Ware J, Bjorner J, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adap-tive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies widely used headache impact scales. Med Care. 2000;38(9):1173–1182.
- Haley S, Coster W, Andres P, et al. Activity out-comes measurement for post-acute care. Med Care. 2004;42(1 suppl):149–161.
- Organization WH. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICT). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
- Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SR Item response theo-ry and health outcomes measurements in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;38(suppl. II):1128–1142.
- Coster W, Haley S, Andres P, Ludlow L, Bond T. Development of an item bank to assess rehabilita-tion outcomes I: personal care and instrumental items. Med Care. 2004;42(1 suppl):162–172.
- Shrout PE, Fleiss IL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86: 420–428.