Task Selection and Enriched Environments: A Functional Upper Extremity Training Program for Stroke Survivors

REFERENCES

• Dunton WR. The principles of occupational therapy. Public Health Nurse. 1918;10:316–321.
   Google Scholar
• Florey LL. Intrinsic motivation: the dynamics of occupational therapy theory. Am 1 Occup Ther. 1969; 23:319–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa E. Authentic occupational therapy. Am 1 Occup Ther. 1967;21:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisen FL, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitation training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:443–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54(10):1938–1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro M, Palazzolo It Drol 1, Drebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61:1604–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:952–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Kreps HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor out-come in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Zelasci F, Latella D, Galli M, Angeli S, Sessa MB. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scan 1 Rehabil Med. 1978;10:147–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feed-back and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:492–502.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Hui-Chan CWY. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephelogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 85:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand Rehabil Med. 1997;29:3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chae I, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998;29:975–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmeres TC. Functional electrostimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:549–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kroon JR, van der Lee IH, Ijzerman MJ, Lankhorst GI. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:350–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(20):1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Theoretical and practical considerations in the restoration of function after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8(3):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teasell RW, Foley NC, Sanjit KB, Speechley MR. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(1):29–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(3):573–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry RH, Lincoln N, Appleyard M. Physiotherapy for the arm and hand after stroke. Physiotherapy. 1999;85 (8):417–425.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one-year follow up study. 1 Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(7): 856–858.
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HIM, Van der Wees Phi, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18: 833–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation. In: Levin H, Grafman I, eds. Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Nudo RI, Barbay S, Kleim IA. Role of neuroplasticity in functional recovery after stroke. In: Levin H, Grafman I, eds. Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher BE, Sullivan KJ. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nudo RI, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. 1 Neurosci. 1996;16: 785–807.
   Google Scholar
• Chu CI, Jones TA. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in cortex heterotopic to focal sensorimotor cotrical damage. Exp Neurol. 2000;166:403–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black JE, Isaacs KR, Anderson BJ, Alcantara AA, Greenough WT. Learning causes synaptiogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc Natl Acad Sc/ USA. 1990;87:5568–5572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. 1 Neurophysiol. 1998;79:2119–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon R. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:811–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, Pidikiti RD, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabil. 1997;9:29–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. 1 Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36: 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80: 624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee IH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GI, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke.1999;30:2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:38–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose DK, Winstein CI. Bimanual training after stroke: Are two hands better than one? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11 (4):20–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitall I, Waller SM, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repeti-tive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2390–2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1076–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie HM, Matyas TA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damage by stroke? Disabil Rehab/l. 2000;22:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Byblow W. Neurophysiological and behavioral adaptations to a bilateral training intervention in individuals following stroke. Clin Rehab/l. 2004;18:48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauraugh J, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one. Stroke. 2002;33: 1589–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classifica-tion of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICE. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC, eds. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, Volume 1. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987:6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney Fl, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med I. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997; 28(4):722–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affolter F. Wahmehmung, Wirklichkeit und Sprache. Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany: Neckar-Verlag; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Davies PM. Steps to Follow: The Comprehensive Treatment of Patients with Hemiplegia, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2000:30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jones TA, Hawrylak N, Klintsova AY, Greenough WT. Brain damage, behavior, rehabilitation, recovery, and brain plasticity. Ment Retard Developmental Disabilities. 1998;4:231–237.
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Brain plasticity as a basis for therapeu-tic procedures. In: Bach-y-Rita P, ed. Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Bern, Switzerland: H. Huber; 1980:225–263.
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Timing and organization of neurorehabilitation. Giornale Italian° di Medicina Riabilitativa. 1990;4:321–322.
   Google Scholar
• Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehab/l. 2005;12(3):58–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. A kine-matic study of contextual effects on reaching perfor-mance in persons with and without stroke: influ-ences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehab/l. 2000;81:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in per-sons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am Occup Ther. 1998;52:447–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Wu C, Tickle-Degnen L, Coster W. Enhancing occupational performance through occupationally embedded exercise: a meta-analytic review. Occup Ther Res 1997;17:25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd RB. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill. Ox-ford: Butterworth-Heineman Ltd; 2004:33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman JJ. Movement and Action in Learning and Development: Clinical Implications for Pervasive Devel-opmental Disorders. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig M. Animal models for the effects of brain lesions and for rehabilitation. In: Bach-y-Rita P, ed. Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber; 1980:127–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm RJ, Temple MD, Buck DL, De Ford SM, Floyd CL. Cognitive recovery from traumatic brain injury: Results of posttraumatic experimental interventions. In: Levin HS, Grafman J, eds. Cerebral Reorganization of Function After Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:49–67.
   Google Scholar