Virtual Reality Applications for Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke

REFERENCES

• National Stroke Association, ed. Information Bulletin. Denver, CO: NSA Publications; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(3):237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research syn-thesis. Stroke. 1997;28(8):1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H. Plasticity in the motor sys-tem related to therapy-induced improvement ofmovement after stroke. Neuro report.1999;10(4):807–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner, Taub E, Weller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31(6): 1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine G, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1084–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann JP, Rushton SK, Smyth M, Jones D. Virtual environments for the rehabilitation of disorders of attention and movement. In: Riva G. Virtual Reality in Neuro-Psycho-Physiology. Washington DC: IOS Press; 1997:157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf WJ. Applications of virtual reality technology to therapy and rehabilitation. Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am. 1997;6(1): 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Schultheis M, Rizzo A. The application of vir-tual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(3):296–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson PN, Foreman N, Stanton D. Virtual reality, disability and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(6):213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G. Virtual environments in neuroscience. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 1998;2: 275–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzo A, Buckwalter J. Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: The state of the art. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;44:123–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy R, Lane N, Berbaum K, Lilienthal M. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviation PsychoL 1993;3(3): 203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Krishack M. Virtual reality: A wholistic approach to rehabilitation. In: Westwood J, Hoffman H, Robb R, Stredney D. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. Washington DC: IOS Press; 1999:90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Motor Behav. 1997;29(2):147–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: Case report. Neurol Rep. 1999;23(2):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Dettwiler A, Dyer T, Niemann G, Bizzi E. Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury in a virtual envi-ronment. In: Westwood JD, ed. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. Newport Beach, CA: AMA Inc.; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Piron L, Triello E, Cenni F, Enzo L, Mauro D, Tonin P. Motor training in virtual environment for post stroke and traumatic brain injured patients. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference; Newport Beach, CA. AMA Inc.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jack D, Boian R, Merians A, et al. Virtual real-ity-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Systems Rehabil Eng. 2001;9(3): 308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D. Virtual reality promotes visu-al and cognitive function in rehabilitation. Cyber-Psychol Behav. 1999;2(1):19–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson J, Hodges LF, Redfern MS, et al. The balance NAVE: A virtual reality facility for research and rehabilitation of balance disor-ders. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference; Newport Beach, CA. AMA Inc.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bilodeau IM, Rosenquist HS. Supplementary feedback in rotary-pursuit tracking. J Exp PsychoL 1964;68(1):53–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cote DO, Williges BH, Williges RC. Augmented feedback in adaptive motor skill training. Hum Factors. 1981;23(4):505–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlin L, Mortimer RG. Effect of verbal, visu-al and auditory augmenting cues on learning a complex motor skill. J Exp Psychol. 1963;65(1):75–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhlen T, Dohle C. Virtual reality for physi-cally disabled people. Comput Biol Med. 1995;25(2):205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thach W, Goodkin H, Keating J. The cerebel-lum and the adaptive coordination of move-ment. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:403–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert D, Ghahramani Z, Jordan M. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(3):460–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flash T, Gurevich I. Arm movement and stiff-ness adaptation to external loads. In: Proceedings of IEEE Engineering Medical Biology Conference; Orlando, FL; 1992: 885–886.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak JJ, Hancock P, Arthur E, Chrysler S. Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics. 1993;36(7):777–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell KM, Carlton MJ, Antoniou A. The interaction of criterion and feedback infor-mation in learning a drawing task. J Motor Behav. 1990;22(4):536–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern G, Roscoe SN, Sivier JE. Display prin-ciples, control dynamics, and environmental factors in pilot training and transfer. Hum Factors. 1990;32 (3):299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau EA, Bilodeau IM. Motor skills learn-ing. Ann Rev PsychoL 1961;12:243–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young DE, Schmidt RA. Augmented kinemat-ic feedback for motor learning. J Motor Behav. 1992;24(3):261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mane AM, Adams JA, Donchin E. Adaptive and part-whole training in the acquisition of a complex perceptual-motor skill. Acta Psychologica. 1989; 71(1-3):179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt R, Lee T. Conditions of practice. In: Motor Control and Learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999:316–317.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller N, Novack T. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med RehabiL 1993;74(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-lvaldi F, Gizter S. Does the nervous system use equilibrium point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci. 1992; 15(4):603–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden KM, Todorov E. Use of virtual envi-ronments in motor learning and rehabilita-tion. In: Stanney KM. Handbook of Virtual Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson PN, Foreman N, Tlauka M. Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to a real environment in physically disabled children. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(12):633–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampton D, Knerr B, Goldberg S, Bliss J, MosheII J, Blau B. The virtual environment performance assessment battery (VEPAB): Development and evaluation. Presence. 1994;3(2):145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Regian J, Shebilske W, Monk J. Virtual reality: An instructional medium for visual-spatial tasks.] Commun. 1992;42(4):136–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latash M. Virtual reality: A fascinating tool for motor rehabilitation (to be used with cau-tion). Disabil Rehabil. 1998;20(3):104–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern G, Roscoe SN. Visual cue augmenta-tion in contact flight simulation. In: Roscoe S, ed. Aviation Psychology. Ames IA: Iowa State University Press; 1980:227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Linden DW, Cauraugh JH, Greene TA. The effect of frequency of kinetic feed-back on learning an isometric force produc-tion task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther. 1993;73(2):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar