Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of its Effectiveness for Upper Limb Motor Recovery

REFERENCES

• Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21: 247–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Homer RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cogni-tion in arm motor skill re-acquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task- specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke. Randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006;37:86–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy in acute stroke: a ran-domized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnson MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan TB. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1992;1:120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Jessel AS. Virtual reality applications to work. Work. 1998;11:277–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzo AA, Kim Gl. A SWOT analysis of the field of VR rehabilitation and therapy. Presence: Teleoperators Vir-tual Environ. 2005;14:119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantovani F, Castelnuovo G. Sense of presence in virtual training: enhancing skills acquisition and transfer of knowledge through learning experience in virtual environments. In: Riva G, Davide F, Ijsselsteijn WA, eds. Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measure-ment of User Presence in Sythetic Envrionments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• SensAble Technologies Inc., 15 Constitution Way, Woburn, MA 01801.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Vives M, Slater M. From presence to con-sciousness through virtual reality. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;(6):332–339.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd LA, Winstein CI. Implicit motor-sequence learn-ing in humans following unilateral stroke: the impact of practice and explicit knowledge. Neurosci Lett. 2001;298:65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ. Intensity versus task-specificity after stroke: how important is intensity. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(9):730–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdea GC. Virtual rehabilitation-benefits and chal-lenges. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):241–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training im-proves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neu-rology. 2003;61:1604–1607.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane database of systematic review in the Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Library. 2006. Available at: http://www.cochranelibrary.com/col-laboration/.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CEN-TRAL) in the Cochrane Collaboration, Cochrane Li-brary. 2006. Available at: http://www.cochranelibrary.com/collaboration/.
   Google Scholar
• Foley N, Teasell R, Jutai J, Bitensky J, Bhogal S, Doherty T. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilita-tion-Upper Extremity Interventions, 8th ed. 2005. Available at: www.ebrsr.com.
   Google Scholar
• ISI Web of Knowledge. ISI Web of Science. 2006. Available at: http://isi6.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi.
   Google Scholar
• Physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). 2006. Available at: http://www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: meth-odology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wells GS, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis. Accessed January 5, 2006. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiol-ogy/oxford.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Atzori AM, Zucconi C, Massaro C, Trivello E, Dam M. The augmented-feedback reha-bilitation technique facilitates the arm motor recov-ery in patients after a recent stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;94:265–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen K. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement reha-bilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1247–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. Neurol Rep. 1999;23(2):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rep. 2002;26(2):62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Piccione F, Laia V, Trivello E, Dam M. Virtual environment training therapy for arm motor rehabilitation. Presence. 2005;14(6):732–740.
   Google Scholar
• Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH, Lee HY, Kim TH. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual re-ality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86: 2218–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Herbert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:751–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand I Rehab Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura R, Moriyama S, Yamada Y, Seki K. Recov-ery of impaired motor function of the upper extrem-ity after stroke. Tohoku I Exp Med. 1992;168:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm N, Curtis D. Normative data for the Purdue Pegboard on a sample of adult candidates for voca-tional rehabilitation. Percept Mot Skills. 1980;50:309–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AB Detector, Box 17124, 402 16 Gothenburg, Swe-den.
   Google Scholar
• Mahurin RK, Debettignies, BH, Pirozzolo, FJ. Struc-tured assessment of independent living skills: prelimi-nary report of a performance measure of functional abilities in dementia./ Gerontol. 1991;46: 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polhemus Inc., Colchester, VT.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proteau L, Blandin Y, Alain C, Dorion A. The effects of the amount and variability of practice on the learning of a multi-segmented motor task. Acta Psych. 1994;85:61–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JFI, Shepherd RB, eds. Movement Science: Foun-dations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Friel KM. Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999;155:713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Merians AL, Sullivan KJ. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsych. 1999;37:975–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalInas EL, Rassmus-Gruhn K, Sjosstrom C. Supporting presence in collaborative environments by hap-tic force feedback. ACM Trans Computer-Human In-teract. 2000;7:461–467.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Michaelsen S, Cirstea C., Roby-Brami A.. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Brain Res. 2002;143:171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Katz N. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer ME, Cohen L, Gage FH, Clarke S, PW Duncan PW, eds. Textbook of Neu-ral Repair and Rehabilitation. Cambridge: University Press; 2006:182–197.
   Google Scholar