Barriers and Facilitators to Mobile Phone Use for People with Aphasia

REFERENCES

• Millennium Declaration. United Nations. Available at: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm. Accessed February 7, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bjärhov M. Mobile against poverty. Telecommunications Int. 2006;40(11):34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wei R, Lo V. Staying connected while on the move: cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media Soc. 2006;8(1):53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie R, Panting C, Charlton T. Mobile phone ownership and usage among pre-adolescents. Telematics Informatics. 2004;21(4):59–373.
   Google Scholar
• Mann W, Helal S, Davenport R, Justiss M, Tomita M, Kemp B. Use of cell phones by elders with impairments: overall appraisal, satisfaction and suggestions. Technol Disabil. 2004(16):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. The Internet and aphasia: crossing the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2001;15(10-11):895–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie NN, Damico JS. Access and social inclusion in aphasia: interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology. 2007;21(1):81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L, Munson R. Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: social and emotional health, and psychological well-being. Aphasiology. 2003;17(4):333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology. 2007;21(1):98–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Wiggins RD, Roy P. Predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2003;17(4):365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen D, Carey A, Friedman M. Cell phone use by adults with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual Developmental Disabil. 2007;45(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICE. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brown K, McGahan L, Alkhaledi M, Seah D, Howe T, Worrall L. Environmental factors that influence the community participation of adults with aphasia: the perspective of service industry workers. Aphasiology. 2006;20(7):595–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe TJ, Worrall LE, Hickson LMH. Observing people with aphasia: environmental factors that influence their community participation. Aphasiology. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton C, Aziz NA, Barwood C, French R, Savina E, Worrall L. Communicatively accessible public transport for people with aphasia: a pilot study. Aphasiology. 2008;22(3):305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jackson TL, Nussbaum MA, Mooney AM. Accessible cell phone design: development and application of a needs analysis framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(10):549–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Smith J, Osborne M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith J, ed. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley J. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Rose T, Howe T, et al. Access to written information for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2005;19(10):923–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Kimelman M. Informed consent in aphasia research: myth or reality? 23rd Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Vol 23. Sedona, AZ: Pro-Ed; 1993:65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Skeat J. AusTOMS for Speech Pathology: Australian Therapy Outcome Measures. Melbourne, VIC: La Trobe University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Poland B. Transcription quality. In: Gubrium J, Holstein J, eds. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. London: Sage Publications; 2001:629–649.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens D, McLaughlin J. Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Funnell E, Allport A. Symbolically speaking: communicating with blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology. 1989;3(3):279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziefle M, Bay S. How older adults meet complexity: aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behaviour Information Technol. 2005;24(5):375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper P. Networking the deaf nation. Aust J Commun. 2003;30(3):153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Power MR, Power D, Horstmanshof L. Deaf people communicating via SMS, TTY, relay service, fax, and computers in Australia. J Deaf Studies Deaf Educ. 2007;12(1):80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A, Webster J, Howard D. A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach to Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia. New York: Psychology Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson PM, Hillis AE. Comprehension and production of written words. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott, Williams &Wilkins; 2001:572–595.
   Google Scholar
• Rose T, Worrall L, McKenna K. The effectiveness of aphasia-friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology. 2003;17(10):947–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. Accessible internet training package helps people with aphasia cross the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2004;18(3):265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper T, Holland A. Situation-specific training for adults with aphasia: an example. Aphasiology. 1998;12(10):933–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson A. The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology. 1994;8(2):143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon JG, Cariski D, Keisler L, et al. Communication partners: enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings. Aphasiology. 1997;11 (7):693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universal Design Principles. The Centre for Universal Design Web Site. Available at: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/Udprincipleshtmlformat.html#top. Accessed April 3, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Repo M. The holistic approach to rehabilitation: a commentary. Aphasiology. 1991;5(6):571–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S. Everyday reading and writing in aphasia: role change and the influence of pre-morbid literacy practice. Aphasiology. 1995;9(3):223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley WJ. Speech to Aphasia/Apraxia Support Group. WinGo Global Website - A resource site for patients and support personnel dealing with speech, aphasia and apraxia issues. Available at: http://www.wingoglobal.com/docs/0907oz.html. Accessed October 25, 2007.
   Google Scholar