Team Assessment in Stroke Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• Wade DT. Editorial: evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. A Theory of Goa/ Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psycho/. 2002;57(9):705–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke E, Frederick E, Bobko P, Lee C. Effect of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance. I Psycho/. 1984;69:241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Lipsey MW. The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment and outcomes. In: Glueckauf RL, Secrest LB, Bond GR, McDonel EC, eds. Improving Assessment in Rehabilitation and Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993:33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Clearly PD, et al. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114: 451–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Horgan F, Keane N, Connolly P, Mannion A, O'Neil D. Detection of disability by different members of an interdisciplinary team. Clin Rehabil. 1996;10:247–254.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath JR, Davis AM. Rehabilitation: where are we going and how do we get there? Clin Rehabil. 1992;6:225-235.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath JR, Adams L. Patient-centered goal planning: a systematic psychological therapy? Top Stroke Rehabil. 1999;6(2):43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. InternationalClassification of Functioning and Disability(ICIDH-2). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney Fl, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J. 1965;14: 61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Guide for the Use of Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation of State University of New York; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabili-tation. Br Med I. 2000;320:1385–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(4):308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower E, McLellan DL, Arney J, Campbell MJ. A randomized controlled trial of different intensities of physiotherapy and different goal-setting procedures in 44 children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38(3):226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris-Baker C, Stephens MA, Rintala DH, Willems EP. Patient behavior as a predictor of outcomes in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62(12): 602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glueckauf RL. Use and misuse of assessment in rehabilitation. In: Glueckauf RL, Secrest LB, Bond GR, McDonel EC, eds. Improving Assessment in Rehabilitation and Health (pp33–60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London, UK: Author; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF. Origins and function of posi-tive and negative affect: a control process review. Psychol Rev. 1990;97:19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath JR, Marks JA, Davis AM. (1995). Towards interdisciplinary rehabilitation: further developments at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9:320–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman Nair KP. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17: 192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Hamilton LR. The needs assessment checklist: a clinical approach to measuring outcome. Spinal Cord, 1999;37(2):136–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff J, Evans MJ, Kennedy P. Goal planning: a retrospective audit of rehabilitation process and outcome. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry C, Kennedy P. A psychometric analysis of the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). Spinal Cord. 2002;41:490–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan TA. Intentional Behavior. New York: Ronald Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Duff J.. Rehabilitation planning. In: Kennedy P, ed. Psychological Management of Physical Disabilities. UK: Routledge; 2007:222–241.
   Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Alavi M, Wagner J. Participation in decision making: an information exchange perspective. In: Ferris G, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 15. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1997: 293–331.
   Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Erez M, Locke E. Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. I Appl Psychol. 1988;73:753–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff J. Rehabilitation and goal planning approaches following spinal cord injury: facilitating adjustment. In: Craig A, Tran Y, eds. Psychological Dynamics Associated with Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: New Directions and Best Evidence. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2009:71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. I Health Social Behav. 1980;21:219–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff J, Kennedy P. Spinal cord injury. In: Llewelyn L, Kennedy P, eds. Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology. Chechster: Wiley 61 Sons; 2003.
   Google Scholar