Measuring Outcomes in People Who Have Had a Stroke and Their Carers: Can the Telephone Be Used?

REFERENCES

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's Health 2006. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printing Services; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Lewis S, Sharpe M, Warlow C. Emotional outcomes after stroke: factors associated with poor outcomes. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68:47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Cooke D, Tooth L. Outcomes after stroke: basic and instrumental activities of daily living, community reintegration and generic health status. Aust Occup Ther J. 2003;50:225–233.
   Google Scholar
• King R. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:1467–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittman M, Faircloth C, Boylstein C. The experience of time in the transition from hospital to home following stroke. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41: 259–268.
   Google Scholar
• Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R, Hinojosa S, Haun J. Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge home. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:21–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Forster A, House A, Knapp P, Wright J, Young J. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD001919.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hanger H, Walker G, Paterson L, McBride S, Sainsbury R. What do patients and their carers want to know about stroke? A two-year follow-up study. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(1):45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellwood I, Dennis M, Warlow C. Perceptions and knowledge of stroke among surviving patients with stroke and their carers. Age Ageing. 1994; 23(1):293–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers H, Bond S, Curless R. Inadequacies of the provision of information to stroke patients and their families. Age Ageing. 2001;30(1):129–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. Evaluating current practice in the provision of written information to stroke patients and their carers. Int Ther Rehabil. 2004;11(1):303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Tooth L, Hoffmann T. Patient perceptions of the quality of information provided in the hospital stroke rehabilitation unit. Br I Occup Ther. 2004;67(3):111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Russell T, McKenna K. Producing computer generated tailored written information for stroke patients and their carers: system development and preliminary evaluation. Int I Med Inform. 2004;73(11-12):751–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook D, Guyatt G, Juniper E, et al. Interview versus self administered questionnaires in developing disease-specific, health-related quality of life for asthma. Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(6):529–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook A, Green M, Krosnick J. Telephone versus face to face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisfying and social desirability response bias. Public Opin Q. 2003;67(1):79–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midanik L, Greenfield T. Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;72(1):209–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith P, Illig S, Fielder R, Hamilton B, Ottenbacher K. Intermodal agreement of follow up telephone functional assessment using the functional independence measure in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(5):431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki D, Tohen M, Gyulai L, et al. Telephone versus in-person clinical and health status assessment interviews in patients with bipolar disorder. Harvard Rev Psycho/. 1997;5(2):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger M, Oddone E, Samsa G, Landsman P. Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the method of administration? I Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(2):135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C, Kosinski M, Ware E. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32(6):551–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(1):2004–2010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorman P, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate and unbiased? Stroke. 1997;28(1):1883–1887.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein L, Lyden P, Mathias S, et al. Telephone assessment of functioning and well-being after stroke: is it feasible? I Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11(2):80–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinburger M, Bagle B, Hanlon J, et al. Assessing health related quality of life in elderly outpatients: telephone versus face-to- face administration.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42(12):1295–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Cooper H. A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. I Marketing Res. 1983;20(1):35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. I Public Health. 2005; 27(3):281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Siemiatycki J. Health related information post discharge: telephone versus face to face interviewing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(12):1287–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh S, Fryer C, Hill K. Telephone and face to face interviews generate similar falls circumstances information from community-dwelling adults with stroke. Aust NZ I Public Health. 2009;33(3): 295–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P, Reker D, Kwon S. Measuring stroke impact with the stroke impact scale: telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Med Care. 2005; 43(5):507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T. Development and evaluation of a computer-generated individualised written education package for patients following stroke and their carers. PhD dissertation. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy P, Davis T, Long S, Jackson R, Decker B. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine (REALM): a quick reading test for patients. Reading. 1993;37(2):124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. Randomised trial of a computer-generated tailored written education package for patients following stroke. Age Ageing. 2007;36(3):280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(1):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug T, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. I Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping D, Smith S. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale - 39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1944–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Lamping D, Smith S, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):544–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson B. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. I Gerontol. 1983;38(3):344–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Exel N, Scholte W, Brouwer W, Van der Berg B, Koopmanschap M, Van den Bos G. Instruments for assessing the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: a comparison of CSI, CRS SCQ and self-rated burden. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(2):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice application to survey of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31).
   Google Scholar
• Perkins J, Sanson-Fisher R. An examination of self and telephone administered modes of administration for the Australia SF-36. I Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51 (11):969–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris L, Weinberger M, Tierney W. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences: a controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mail surveys. Med Care. 1997;35(1):70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson J. The importance of post discharge telephone follow up for hospitalists: a view from the trenches. Am J Med. 2002;111 (9):43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bell K, Hoffman J, Doctor J, et al. Development of a telephone follow-up program for individuals following traumatic brain injury. I Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;9(6):502–512.
   Google Scholar
• Mistiaen P, Poot E. Telephone follow up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for post discharge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4: CD004510. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD004510.pub3.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch G. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. I Am Med Assoc. 1992;267(13):1788–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot-Schmidt R, Strong J. The concept of well-being in a rural setting: understanding health and illness. Aust I Rural Health. 1997;5(2):59–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worrall L, Rose T, Howe T, McKenna K, Hickson L. Developing an evidence-based for communication accessibility for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2007;21 (1):124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Bennett S, McKenna K, Green-Hill J, McCluskey A, Tooth L. Interventions for stroke rehabilitation: analysis of the research contained in the OTseeker evidence database. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar